Home Blog Page 243

Melania Trump learns big PR lesson in Epstein fiasco; Megyn Kelly asks ‘Why now?’

0

Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly said she was “dumbfounded” by first lady Melania Trump’s public statement about her ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Megyn Kelly questioned the timing of Melania Trump's handling of the Epstein allegations and expressed confusion about her statement amid the current news focus on Iran. (Reuters/Evan Vucci and AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Megyn Kelly questioned the timing of Melania Trump’s handling of the Epstein allegations and expressed confusion about her statement amid the current news focus on Iran. (Reuters/Evan Vucci and AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

During Thursday’s appearance on “The Megyn Kelly Show,” Kelly questioned why Melania chose to speak out now, asking, “Why did she do that?” She further analyzed the timing of the statement and the impact on her show.

Earlier, Melania issued a rare strongly worded statement denying any relationship with Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

Read more: Megyn Kelly slams Gavin Newsom’s ‘crazy’ wife over sister’s death

Kelly questions timing, intent

Kelly said she was “dumbfounded” by the decision to reopen the discussion around Epstein, noting that the issue had not been in the headlines recently. She said, “Why did she do that?”

She continued, “That’s really the question everyone is asking. Why? Everyone in PR knows that once a storm passes, you don’t do anything to recover from it.”

She later commented on Melania’s presence in the media over the years, saying: “I don’t know, but I do know that it’s weird that this woman who has been familiar with the media for ten years, who hasn’t been at the center of the storm, decided to make herself the center of the storm.”

She further added, “If she doesn’t want people to talk about her relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell… then she shouldn’t be talking about her relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein, especially when — is this in the news? Have any of you seen it in the news? The news right now is non-stop Iran.”

She said the statement could be a response to resurfaced archival material, such as a report on emails from the early 2000s, or it could be a strategic move, but she did not draw a firm conclusion.

Kelly also speculated that the speech may be a strategic move to divert public attention from the US-Iraq war. “Is this an attempt to distract from Iran? Like, are they using Epstein to distract from Iran and then using Iran to distract from Epstein?” she said.

“We’re all scratching our heads. It’s so weird,” Kelly said.

Read more: Trump v. Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Alex Jones: What the President of the United States Said

Melania Trump makes rare public denial

In a statement earlier this week, Melania Trump dismissed the accusations linking her to Epstein as “false” and “politically motivated.” She also called attention to the victims of Epstein’s abuse during her speech.

She said: “Those who lied to me lacked moral standards, humility and respect. I do not object to their ignorance, but I object to their malicious slander of my reputation. I have never been a friend of Epstein.”

She stressed that she had no involvement in Epstein’s activities and denied that Epstein played any role in her introduction to President Donald Trump.

She said: “I was not a victim of Epstein. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband by chance at a party in New York City in 1998. That first encounter with my husband is well documented in my book.”

Auckland Indian man faces abusive phone calls after video of emptying rubbish from car goes viral: ‘I’ve apologized’

0

Auckland Indian man faces abusive phone calls after video of emptying rubbish from car goes viral: 'I've apologized'

An Indian-origin man in Auckland says he has complained to police and sought help from cyber security after a video purportedly of him dumping cardboard went viral, sparking abusive messages and public backlash.The man, who remains anonymous, said the incident made him feel unsafe after the video was shared on social media. He also claimed that the person filming the confrontation damaged his vehicle and broke a wing mirror during the incident.“I have apologized to the police and I have also told them that I am ready to pay the fine, if any, and apologize to the person who made our video,” the man told The Weekend India.Police have confirmed they have received a complaint in relation to the incident in Alfriston, Auckland, on April 4, The Weekend India reports. A spokesman said: “Police can confirm they have received reports of an incident in Alfriston earlier this month.”The man said he and a friend were trying to get rid of three large pieces of cardboard before planning an event at their home. He claimed they inspected recycling facilities at Manurewa and Papakura but found they were closed for a public holiday.Upon their return, they attempted to leave the cardboard on the grass, thinking it would decompose over time, and then encountered a passing driver.“Within 15 seconds, a car pulled up in front of us and a man got out with a cell phone camera and started recording and insulting,” the man said.The confrontation in the video becomes tense, with the person recording yelling “Don’t litter our country.” The footage also captured documentation of the abuse.The video begins with the tape recorder saying: “Fuck you,” and shows the man apologizing and placing the cardboard back in the car after being confronted. In response, the recorder continued, “Don’t be sorry. Don’t come littering our country.”The video quickly went viral, attracting thousands of reactions and comments. The man said he also sought help from Netsafe to remove the video from social media. However, he claimed that the organization’s capabilities were limited.“Netsafe told me they couldn’t remove all the videos because the video didn’t violate community standards,” the man said.“The video also went viral in India. Netsafe could only remove some of the videos,” he added.He said the video’s online spread was driven by pages seeking engagement and views, and said he regretted the incident.“I want people to know that if you do something wrong, accept it immediately and apologize,” he said.

Nasha Mukt J&K: LG launches drive to cut off supplies from Pakistan, swiftly punishes hawkers

0

Jammu: J&K Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha on Saturday launched the ‘Nasha Mukt Jammu Kashmir Abhiyaan’, a 100-day campaign to eradicate the drug menace from the Union Territory by restricting the supply of contraband in Pakistan and ensuring exemplary punishment to drug traffickers.“The government is committed to effectively address this social evil and protect the youth across UT,” Sinha said before launching the campaign with a foot march from the Maulana Azad Stadium in Jammu.“Our neighbor (Pakistan) is using cross-border smuggling to poison our communities and undermine our country’s future. Every official has an obligation: this must stop. The full force of the law is now directed against smugglers. Their networks will be dismantled immediately,” he said.“As per the new SOPs, passports, driving licenses, Aadhaar numbers and arms licenses of drug traffickers will be revoked. Their assets will be seized and bank accounts frozen. Lookout notices will be issued to drug traffickers. Punishment will be swift. The crackdown will be passed down from generation to generation,” the district administration said.Sinha said the next three months will be critical, with the campaign moving forward in six clear phases: intensive awareness drive, youth-focused activities, community engagement, rigorous enforcement, rehabilitation and evaluation.

21 villagers in Nigeria were killed by “bandits”

0

Twenty-one people were killed in clashes between villagers in Nigeria’s northern Zamfara state and “bandits” after they refused to pay them, three locals told AFP on Saturday.

21 villagers in Nigeria were killed by
21 villagers in Nigeria were killed by “bandits”

Zamfara is one of several states in northwest and central Nigeria where local criminal gangs, known locally as bandits, carry out deadly attacks, kidnappings and robberies.

The gangs are increasingly linked to jihadists in the northeast who have waged a 17-year-old armed insurgency, causing concern among officials.

More than 100 people have been killed by jihadists and criminal gangs in northern Nigeria since Sunday, including a brigadier general.

Dozens of gangsters on about 80 motorcycles attacked Bunkasau village in Bukkuyum district on Friday and engaged in a gun battle with residents, villagers said.

A police spokesman confirmed the incident to AFP but gave no details.

“We are aware that violence occurred but we are still investigating and gathering details,” said Yazid Abubakar, a police spokesman in Zamfara state.

However, three locals said 21 people died in the clashes.

“The bandits killed 21 people during the fighting,” said Lawwali Umar, a community leader in the town of Bukkuyum, where the district is headquartered.

Omar said the villagers were fed up with the taxes levied regularly by the bandits and decided not to pay them anymore.

Omar said the villagers decided to use the money to buy weapons and defend themselves.

Jamilu Aliyu, another Bukkuyum resident, also announced the same death toll.

Babuga Ahmad from the neighboring village of Yash said the bandits engaged in gun battles with villagers, who then “opened fire with all their might” after they ran out of bullets.

“They killed 21 people,” Ahmed said.

Photos sent to AFP from the village showed two rows of dead young men lying on the blood-stained floor of the room.

Banditry violence begins with conflicts between herders and farmers over scarce water and land resources.

It evolved into organized cattle rustling and kidnapping syndicates.

The Nigerian government has deployed troops to Zamfara to suppress bandits since 2015, but violence continues.

State authorities have repeatedly reached peace deals with the bandits and offered amnesty in exchange for handing over their weapons, but the bandits have continued to return to violence.

abu strait

This article was generated from automated news agency feeds without modifications to the text.

Abraham Lincoln’s quote of the day: “Character is like a tree, and reputation is like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.” | World News

0

Abraham Lincoln's quote of the day:
Abraham Lincoln’s Quote of the Day

People often judge themselves based on what others see or hear about them in their daily lives. The way people see and think about someone affects how they are treated in society. But this view isn’t always the full picture of who they really are. This is where Abraham Lincoln’s quote comes in handy. It clearly shows what is real and what is not.Abraham Lincoln was a great leader during one of the most difficult periods in American history. He often spoke in simple but important ways. His words are still relevant today because they speak to fundamental human values. He uses simple comparisons to make complex ideas easier to understand. He said that character is like a tree and reputation is like a shadow. They are all related, but not the same.The idea is easy to understand, but has a lot of implications. It’s a reminder that what other people think isn’t always the whole truth. It also shows how important it is to focus more on your inner values ​​rather than your outer appearance. Let’s look at what this quote means and why it’s still relevant today.

Quotation of the day Author: Former U.S. President Abraham Lincoln

“Character is like a tree, and reputation is like a shadow. The shadow is what we think, but the tree is real.”

Understand the meaning of Abraham Lincoln’s quotes

This quote uses a picture of nature to explain human thought. A tree is solid, real, and deep. Over time, it grew larger and represented something that existed on its own. Shadows, on the other hand, are just reflections. It changes based on light, angle, and viewing angle.When Lincoln compared character to a tree, he was talking about a person’s true nature. Honesty, integrity, and behaviors that show who a person truly is are all part of character. It grows over time and is built by doing the same thing over and over again.Reputation, he said, is like a shadow that shows how others view a person. It can change quickly based on what people think, hear, or don’t know. It may not always show the entire picture, just like a shadow.

Why character is more important than reputation

People tend to care more about their reputation because it’s easily visible. It affects how you are received, how many job opportunities you have, and how you are viewed in public. But sometimes, reputation can be wrong.On the other hand, the character remains the same even when no one is watching. It helps people make choices and do things. Lincoln’s famous quote shows that true value lies in character, not what others think.This idea is important because it shifts the focus from how things look to how they really are. It encourages people to develop strong values ​​and not just worry about their appearance.

How social reputation is formed

People often build their reputations by how they behave in public, how they talk to others, and how they interact with others. There are many factors that can influence it, such as media, social networks, and personal relationships.Reputation can change quickly because it depends on how people perceive things. Events or misunderstandings can change people’s perceptions of someone. It’s like how shadows change when the light changes.Lincoln’s comparison illustrates why reputation should not be considered the only criterion by which individuals are judged. This is only part of it, and may not always be true.

The role of action in building character

Character is not formed in an instant. It grows over time through regular action. Every choice, no matter how big or small, affects a person.Being honest with the people you see every day, taking responsibility for your work, and respecting others are all part of character. These characteristics may not be immediately apparent, but over time they shape a person.Lincoln’s famous quote reminds us that character is what matters most. Reputation may come with it, but it’s not the same as what actually happens.

Real life relevance of the quote

You can use this idea in many areas of your life. People are often judged at work based on how well they perform and how others perceive them. Reputation can help you succeed, but it’s character that will help you succeed in the long run.In relationships, trust is built by doing the same things over and over again. First impressions can influence people’s perceptions, but over time, true character emerges.Leaders are often judged on the basis of their reputation in public life. But history usually remembers who they were and what they did.

A simple comparison explains a complex fact

One of the reasons this quote remains popular is because of its simplicity. It’s easy to understand a picture of a tree and its shadow. But it does a great job of showing the difference between what is real and what we think is real.Even if a tree casts a shadow, it is there. Even if the shadow changes or disappears, the tree remains the same. Likewise, a man’s character is separate from his reputation.This comparison can help people realize that what others think of them does not determine who they really are.

Other quotes from Abraham Lincoln

  • “Government of the people, by the people, for the people will not perish from the face of the earth.”
  • “Those who deprive others of their freedom should not gain it for themselves.”
  • “I walk slowly, but I never step back.”
  • “No matter who you are, be a good person.”

Why this message is still relevant today

In today’s world where information travels quickly, reputations can change in an instant. Social media and other digital platforms make it easy for people to form opinions quickly. In this case, the distinction between character and reputation becomes even more important.Lincoln’s quote reminds us that reputation can change how people think of us, but it does not define who we are. A person’s true value lies in their actions, choices, and honesty.This message is still important because it speaks to basic human needs. People want to know who they really are, not just how others see them.

From Lincoln’s perspective

This sentence makes it very clear. Character is the true essence of a person, while reputation is just what other people think of them. They are all related, but not the same.People can create a strong and stable identity by focusing on their character. Your character remains the same, but your reputation changes over time.The difference is easy to see in the words of Abraham Lincoln. They tell people to look beyond their appearance and focus on what truly makes them who they are.

J&K: 8-year-old girl mauled to death by dog ​​in Sopore

0

Srinagar: An eight-year-old girl was mauled to death by a dog in Sopore, the second such death in the district in less than a year.Aiman ​​Adnan Sheikh died within minutes of being attacked on Friday in an apple orchard near his home in Seloo village of Sopore, 55 kilometers north of Srinagar, doctors said. “The child was alone approximately 200 feet from her home when she was attacked by the dog,” a police officer said.According to the neighborhood medical officer Dr Zulfikar, the child suffered serious injuries. “She was bitten on her face, neck, chest, abdomen and both thighs, including a deep gash on her neck. It was a painful sight for us,” Zulfikar said.Witness Suhail Mushtaq Naikoo said the attack had left the community “shocked”. Some residents claimed that dogs were being transferred from Sopore town to nearby villages, exacerbating the situation.Sopore MLA Irshad Ahmad Kar of the ruling National Conference (NC) recalled that a man died after being attacked by a dog in the area last year, leaving behind his wife and three young daughters. “Deaths caused by dog ​​attacks should be appropriately compensated and municipalities held accountable,” Carr said.

Who is Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gamma? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman arrested after home raid

0

20-year-old man arrested for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails at OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home in San Francisco’s Russian Hill neighborhood has been identified as Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gama, the San Francisco Standard reports.

Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gama, 20, faces serious charges, including attempted murder, for allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at the San Francisco home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. (AFP)
Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gama, 20, faces serious charges, including attempted murder, for allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at the San Francisco home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. (AFP)

He was eventually booked san francisco He was charged with attempted murder, arson, criminal threats, two counts of possession of an incendiary device, and two counts of possession of a destructive device at the county jail on Friday afternoon (US time).

Also read: Who is Amanda Ungaro? All the reports about Brazilian model’s husband, kids and threats to ‘expose’ Melania Trump after Epstein’s denials

Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gama: What we know about the suspect

The incident occurred around 3:45 a.m., according to Altman’s description of the shocking incident in his blog post. Police report cited in “The” san francisco The Standard confirmed the suspect used a lit rag to throw a bottle at the metal door of 855 Chestnut St.

Surveillance video captured images of the suspect in front of the residence, according to information obtained by San Francisco news outlets. The image has been obscured pending official identification of the suspect by U.S. authorities.

The same individual threatened to cause significant damage to OpenAI’s headquarters in Mission Bay after fleeing Altman’s neighborhood following the first alleged attack using an incendiary device, the San Francisco Police Department said in a statement.

Officials later confirmed that the suspect was arrested outside OpenAI’s Third Street offices while threatening to set the building on fire.

In response to the incident, San Francisco police and firefighters were dispatched to Altman’s residence around 4 a.m. Authorities further said that while there was a fire at the exterior door, it had “self-extinguished” when they arrived. An incendiary device was recovered from the location as evidence.

Sam Altman’s Attack: What Was the Motive?

No further information about the incident has been disclosed. Law enforcement has not revealed the suspect’s exact motive for his actions early Friday.

Regarding Altman’s blog post, he noted that he came across an “inflammatory article” about himself a few days ago. The creators of ChatGPT may have cited a New Yorker article questioning whether Altman was “trustworthy.”

In addition to personal insights, his blog post also considers how severe anxiety surrounding artificial intelligence may have contributed to this shocking event.

“Someone said to me yesterday that they thought this was coming at a time when people are very anxious about artificial intelligence, which made things more dangerous for me. I put that aside,” he said. “Now I wake up in the middle of the night, angry, and I think I underestimated the power of words and narrative. Now seems like a good time to address some issues.”

‘Saffron lies are better than blatant lies’: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Stalin attacks BJP-led Center ahead of polls

0

New Delhi: tamil nadu chief minister Stalin On Saturday, he took aim at the BJP-led Center, accusing it of spreading “saffron lies” that went beyond “blatant lies”.Addressing a rally in Tirupattur, Stalin said: “Tamil Nadu occupies an important position in all rankings of the Union government… After learning all this, Union Minister Piyush Goyal roared that the state’s development was going backwards day by day. We hear about “green lies” (blatant lies). It is a ‘saffron lie’ that goes beyond that. “Stalin asked the Prime Minister why Narendra Modi Other central leaders did not visit the Quizadi excavation site, despite campaigning nearby. “Why does Tamil historical pride taste bitter to you?” he asked.He also claimed that voting for any party outside the DMK-led alliance would effectively benefit the alliance. bjp. accuse Artificial Intelligence ADMK Stalin said, “Even if the AIADMK wins, only a BJP government will be formed here.”Highlighting the economic performance of Tamil Nadu, Stalin said the state ranks first in industrial production and textile exports and second in GDP and per capita income.He outlined key welfare promises under the “Dravidian Model 2.0”, including the “Illatharasi” scheme, which would provide vouchers worth Rs 8,000 to women to buy home appliances. He also announced that the monthly ‘Magalir Urimai Thogai’ fee will be doubled to Rs 2,000.“Just as leader Kalaignal delivered color TV sets and gas stoves as promised, so too will his son fulfill the Ilatalasi plan,” he said. The government aims to provide laptops to 3.5 million college students by 2030 and increase paddy procurement price to Rs 3,500 per quintal, he added.Citing events in Uttar Pradesh and Manipur, Stalin urged voters to choose between a “progressive Tamil Nadu” and what he called “jungle rule” in the BJP-ruled state, the Press Trust of India reported.He campaigned for alliance candidates in Tirupattur and nearby constituencies and had earlier reiterated his commitment to state autonomy in Pudukottai, asserting that no financial pressure would force Tamil Nadu to abandon its two-language policy.

‘Age difference, limited common language…’: Immigration lawyer explains how risks of getting marriage-based green card become greater

0

'Age difference, limited common language...': Immigration lawyer explains how risks of getting marriage-based green card become greater

Immigration lawyers say U.S. scrutiny of marriage-based green card applications has tightened in recent months, with applicants facing tighter checks during interviews and stepped up enforcement actions even during the interview phase. Marriage remains one of the most common routes to permanent residency, but lawyers warn the process is now more scrutinized than before.Douglas Lightman, an immigration attorney at Lightman Law Firm in New York, said, “Obtaining a green card through marriage is one of the most common ways to obtain legal permanent residence in the United States. It is also one of the fastest ways to obtain permanent residency, with some applicants taking only 9 to 15 months to be approved.”However, he and other lawyers point out that it is also one of the riskiest avenues because applicants must clearly prove that the marriage was genuine and not established for the purpose of immigration benefits.A marriage-based green card allows the foreign spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident to live and work anywhere in the country. The type of green card issued depends on how long ago the couple was married at the time of approval.Attorney Letterman explained that there are two main categories. Once the application is approved, the spouse who has been married for more than two years will receive a ten-year green card. This is also called an IR-1 visa. A two-year conditional green card is issued when the marriage is approved less than two years ago. This is called a CR-1 visa and requires the couple to later file Form I-751 to remove the conditions.U.S. citizens can usually file Form I-130 and Form I-485 at the same time to expedite processing, but spouses of green card holders often face longer wait times due to visa caps and quotas.Eligibility rules remain strict. Immigration attorney Matthew Curtis explains: “The marriage must be legally valid and accompanied by a government-issued marriage certificate. USCIS recently updated its policy to clarify that only marriages that are legally recognized and registered with civil authorities are eligible. The spouses must be legally free to marry and all previous marriages must have been properly terminated by divorce, annulment, or death.In addition to paperwork, applicants must meet the so-called bona fide marriage standard, which is often the most scrutinized part of the case. “USCIS will examine whether you and your spouse are living together through financial entanglements, cohabitation and emotional ties. The burden of proof is entirely on you,” Curtis said.Both spouses should provide strong supporting evidence. “Joint financial accounts show financial interdependence,” Lightman said. Housing documents prove you live together. Photos capture the time during your relationship. Affidavits from friends and family provide third-party verification. Travel records, correspondence records and receipts of joint purchases can all enhance your persuasiveness.At the same time, lawyers warn that certain factors may raise red flags. “Factors such as a significant age difference, limited common language, marriage immediately after a brief courtship, living apart at different addresses, minimal joint financial documentation and a previous marriage to a U.S. citizen all trigger greater scrutiny,” Curtis said.Financial requirements also remain central. Letterman explained that sponsors must prove they can support a spouse at 125 percent of the federal poverty level, which would require an income of about $25,550 for a family of two. If this condition is not met, applicants may rely on joint sponsors, combined household income, or qualifying assets.

Grand Central stabbing latest: Suspect identified after 3 injured in NYC; details on victims

0

Grand Central Station stabbing update: A machete-wielding suspect was shot dead by police after stabbing three people on a subway platform. central station Terminal Saturday morning, authorities said. Now, new details about the suspect and victim have emerged.

Police put crime tape on subway turnstiles after stabbing and shooting at Grand Central subway station in New York (AP)
Police put crime tape on subway turnstiles after stabbing and shooting at Grand Central subway station in New York (AP)

What happened at Central Station on Saturday?

According to law enforcement officials, the attack occurred around 9:50 a.m. ET when the man walked onto the platform and a confrontation ensued. Armed with a machete, he reportedly began attacking passengers, injuring three elderly victims.

Read more: Nancy Guthrie Latest: Sheriff Nanos has 10 days to save job, case takes shocking turn

First details about victims

The victims, who have not yet been identified, are described as a 65-year-old man, a 70-year-old woman and an 84-year-old man. Police said at least one victim was initially in critical condition and all three were taken to hospital and are expected to survive. Two police officers were also taken to the hospital and are currently in stable condition.

Central Station stabbing suspect identified

Meanwhile, CNN and NBC sources cited officials as saying authorities had identified the suspect. No names have been released yet. According to officials, the situation escalated into a tense confrontation that lasted about 10 minutes. Officers ordered the suspect multiple times to drop his weapon, but he instead walked toward them. He was subsequently shot by police and later died from his injuries.

Read more: Why Savannah’s ‘Today’ show will be different next week amid Nancy Guthrie investigation

The suspect is already known to law enforcement and has been arrested before, including for incidents involving threatening behavior and assault with a sharp object, authorities said.

According to reports, the suspect acted strangely on the subway train.

Kathy Hochul, Zohran Mamdani react

New York Governor Kathy Hochul condemned the violence, saying on social media that “innocent people were attacked in a senseless act of violence.”

“I’m grateful to our brave officers who acted quickly to stop the suspect,” she added on the X (formerly Twitter) platform.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said on Twitter: “I have been informed of an incident that occurred at Grand Central Station this morning. Reports indicate that a man slashed three people with a machete on the platform. When the man did not drop the machete, police opened fire. He has since been pronounced dead.”

“I thank the NYPD for their quick response and preventing further violence. The three victims were transported to the hospital and are thankfully in stable condition. The NYPD is conducting an internal investigation and will release the body-worn camera footage, as it does in all incidents involving officer-involved shootings.”

Police officials, including Jessica S. Tisch, are expected to provide further updates. Investigators said there was no indication at this stage that the incident was terrorism-related.