Home Blog Page 27

Los Angeles mayoral race intensifies, Spencer Pratt caught lying; new poll focuses on Karen Bass, Nithya Raman

0

Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Platt may have just screwed up. The 42-year-old comes just days after posting a video showing him living in a trailer following the catastrophic fires in Los Angeles, although he himself admitted he didn’t live there. Instead, Pratt stayed at a luxury hotel, where a standard room can cost anywhere from $1,000 to more than $1,700 per night. Prices for the hotel’s higher-end suites can be much higher, including the hotel’s Swan Lake Suite, which reportedly costs more than $8,000 per night.

Spencer Pratt speaks during appearance "fox and friends" Fox News headquarters (Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)
Spencer Pratt speaks on “Fox & Friends” at Fox News headquarters (Andy Kropa/Invision/AP)

Why is this a blatant lie?

Platt recently took aim at his opponents Karen Bass and Nithya Rahman, saying his home was destroyed in the Los Angeles fire. In a campaign-style video filmed after his family lost their home, the former TV star stood in front of a trailer and declared: “This is where I live.”

However, Platt later disputed the claim that he actually lived there full-time.

“We asked Spencer if he had ever lived in a trailer and he said no,” TMZ reported Wednesday, adding, “I’ve never told anyone I lived there.” “

Yet in a campaign ad, he stood in front of a trailer and said bluntly: “This is where I live.”

Why Spencer Pratt Doesn’t Live in the Trailer

Platt told the publication that he pulled out of the trailer, which he mentioned frequently in his campaign messaging, due to safety concerns and alleged death threats. Pratt has reportedly been staying at the ultra-luxurious Bel Air Hotel for more than a month.

Platt told TMZ the move was strictly for safety reasons.

“The reality is that the Bastards and the Lamanians are kind of crazy, and since I destroyed them in the debates and soared in the polls, they’ve become increasingly desperate and hostile.”

He added, “I can’t talk about specific threats, but that group of people … are not safe right now.”

Sources cited in the report said Pratt’s wife, Heidi Montag, and their children currently live in Carpinteria, and that the trailer that became part of Pratt’s public narrative is no longer in use.

New Poll: Spencer Platt vs Nithya Raman vs Karen Bass

Meanwhile, an Emerson College Poll/California Politics Insider Survey released on May 13 showed that incumbent Mayor Karen Bass currently leads with 30% of voters. This marks a significant jump from Bath’s 20% in March.

The poll also highlights one of the biggest shifts in the race so far: a sharp drop in undecided voters from 51% in March to 16% in May, suggesting that many residents have finally decided on their preferred candidate.

Bass’s recent momentum has been fueled by a high-profile endorsement from former Vice President Kamala Harris.

Spencer Pratt’s approval ratings surge

While Bass still leads overall, the biggest increase in support goes to Spencer Platt. The poll found Platt’s approval rating climbed to 22% in May from 10% in March, making him one of the biggest surprises in the race.

Meanwhile, Nithya Raman’s approval rating has also risen significantly, rising to 19% in the latest survey from 9% in March.

The three candidates recently shared the stage in a mayoral debate on NBC4 and Telemundo 52, with issues such as homelessness, wildfire recovery and housing policy dominating the discussion.

Other candidates remain far behind the frontrunners

All but three of the major candidates continue to trail significantly in voter support.

Nonprofit executive and entrepreneur Adam Miller has an approval rating of 7% in the latest poll, up slightly from 4% earlier this year.

Rae Chen Huang, a pastor and housing advocate, saw her approval rating rise slightly, from 3% to 4%.

The official list of candidates released by the City Clerk’s Office also includes Bryant Acosta, Asaad Alnajjar, Nelson Cheng, Tish Hyman, Andrew Kim, Suzy Kim, John Logsdon, Juanita Lopez and Andrej A. Selivra. Candidates Griselda Diaz and Misael Ortega are also in the running.

Election day is coming

Los Angeles voters will go to the polls on June 2 to elect a mayor. If no candidate secures an outright majority, the top two candidates will advance to a runoff election scheduled for November.

Tang Zi vs. “Philosopher King” Xi Jinping: Interpreting the worldviews of Donald Trump and Xi Jinping | World News

0

Trump lands in Beijing; Xi Jinping doesn't welcome US president in person | See what happened

FILE – President Donald Trump, left, shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the G20 Summit in Osaka, Japan, June 29, 2019. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

In April of this year, a particular meme took the Chinese internet by storm: “Tang Zi”. portmanteau of Donald Trump and Sun Tzu, which imagines the 47th president of the United States as a strategic sage whose wisdom somehow escapes grammar and causality. The meme is filled with Trumpian “winning” sayings, including “Break the enemy’s blockade by blocking the enemy’s blockade,” “If you don’t know what you’re doing, your enemy doesn’t either,” and “If you don’t have a goal, you can’t lose.” Sun Tzu wrote “The Art of War”. Tangzi seems to have written “The Art of What’s Happening?” 》This meme works because it captures the reality of how Trump uses power. He does not practice strategy in the old sense of dogma, discipline, patience, and a clearly defined end state. His genius, if he was being generous, was in turning chaos into leverage. He makes so much noise that everyone else has to explain it. He declares victory before, during, after, and sometimes in place of the battle. In Trump’s world, this declaration is not a description of reality. This is an attempt to replace it.

watch

Trump lands in Beijing; Xi Jinping doesn’t welcome US president in person | See what happened

Which brings us to the man across the table. If Trump is a traitor, Xi Jinping Is the philosopher king. A recent New York Times closed-door profile of Xi Jinping described a ruler who has no close domestic rivals, is willing to lecture weaker leaders and conducts himself in the manner of China’s ancient rulers, blending political authority with civilized teachings. Tang Zi is interesting because he turns strategy into nonsense. Xi Jinping is disturbing because he turns other people’s nonsense into evidence of his own seriousness. Trump behaves in politics like a man who believes the room exists because he has entered it. Xi Jinping behaves in politics like a man who believes this room has been there for five thousand years and has been patiently waiting for others to learn the correct form of address.

the art of winning no coherence

Trump’s philosophy is often mistaken for no philosophy, but without enough confidence to practice it, no philosophy can become an institution. Every issue becomes a deal, every deal becomes a show, every show needs a winner, and the winner, ideally, before anyone checks the papers, is Donald Trump.

Trump and Xi Jinping

That’s why Trump’s foreign policy has always had the air of a casino, complete with hosts, bodyguards and people selling souvenir steaks near the exits. Alliance is an unpaid invoice. A trade deficit is an insult. The summit is a televised contest of manliness, and then someone has to show up and tell the cameras that this conversation was historic, beautiful, and very powerful. Form is more important than substance because form is substance.Trump’s incoherence has political utility because it exhausts explanation. Allies, foes, markets, bureaucrats, generals and journalists expended enormous energy trying to decipher whether his latest statement was policy, a provocation, a bargaining chip, a grievance, brain static or some previously undiscovered fifth state of matter. If you don’t know what you’re doing, your enemies won’t either. Without a clear goal, failure is impossible. If reality contradicts claims, reality is accused of liberal bias.

The use of Xi and order

Xi Jinping seemed to understand Trump early on, but did not express admiration. In Xi’s account of his last meeting with Barack Obama in Lima in 2016, Trump had just shocked the world by winning the US presidential election, and Xi seemed bewildered that American voters would choose someone so unconventional. Obama has sought to explain Trump’s rise as a result of setbacks in the U.S. economy, including anger over the loss of manufacturing jobs and the theft of intellectual property. Xi Jinping was reportedly dissatisfied with this. He put down his pen, crossed his arms, and delivered a sentence that sounded less like a diplomatic analysis and more like a verdict carved on a palace wall: If an immature leader plunges the world into chaos, the world will know who to blame.That moment was important because it showed how aligned Xi Jinping is about Trump, America and democracy. Trump proves that American institutions have lost their ability to filter out unserious content, that democracy can turn resentment into leadership, and that the liberal order has created a people who see institutions as pillars and norms as traps. For a leader who has spent years portraying China as stable, disciplined and historically consistent, Trump’s rise is a gift from the comparative political gods. Beijing does not need to invent arguments about Western chaos. The United States has exported live streaming.Xi Jinping’s political performance is based on the opposite proposition: Chaos is Western, order is Chinese, and history has finally found adult supervision. The Chinese Communist Party derives its legitimacy not just from revolution or economic growth, but also from its role as the guardian of China’s history. Xi Jinping reinforced this claim. He spoke as if China was not just a modern nation-state but a civilization that had experienced a brief few bad centuries and was now recovering its rightful place in the universe. During Obama’s 2014 visit to Beijing, aides were expected to discuss the South China Sea. Instead, Obama and Xi reportedly had a lengthy conversation about whether individualistic and collectivist Confucian societies could be compatible. This is politics as the study of civilization.

How do they treat middle powers?

The treatment of middle powers reveals the differences between Trump and Xi with unusual clarity. Trump treats middle powers like supporting actors in a drama of American discontent. Canada, Denmark, NATO allies and trading partners often serve not as diplomatic entities with their own limits and dignity, but as extras in the White House’s propaganda of American power. The Greenland incident remains the clearest example. Trump’s continued interest in acquiring or controlling the self-governing Danish territory has turned the ally’s sovereignty issue into a ritual of domination, with the island’s people and Denmark forced to continually explain that they are not non-performing assets on a golf course’s balance sheet. Trump’s approach is to apply pressure with a microphone. He didn’t just want to give in; He wants to see other countries forced to make concessions.

chaos and order

Xi Jinping’s approach to middle powers is different in style but not necessarily softer in substance. He doesn’t need a carnival. He prefers controlled rooms, tight smiles and polite reprimands. Exchange 2022 justin trudeau Still the most obvious example. Xi Jinping confronted the Canadian leader at the G20 summit in Indonesia after media reported details of their earlier conversation. Xi told Trudeau that was inappropriate and inconsistent with the conversation. Trudeau tried to explain that Canada believes in open dialogue and diplomacy that seeks common ground while reserving differences. Xi interrupted him, said to create conditions first, shook his hand and walked away.In that brief exchange, Xi Jinping’s power grammar was reflected. He wasn’t just against leaks. He was against violating the hierarchy. Speak in the right room. Use the right tone to raise objections. Do not embarrass the monarch in public. Mark Carney’s account of his meeting with Xi points in the same direction. According to Carney, Xi spent the first part of their interaction explaining how he hoped to develop a personal relationship. As Carney explained, the message was simple: no surprises, direct, ask questions privately, don’t lecture me in public.So the difference is obvious. Trump humiliates middle powers through public pressure; Xi Jinping restrains them by sanctifying protocol. Trump uses them to prove that America can still push. Xi Jinping uses them to show that China cannot be treated like another country.

Gratitude and fate

Their critique of democracy is equally illuminating. Trump’s criticism was emotional. Democracy is legitimate when it loves him, dubious when it rejects him, and sacred when it returns him to power. Xi Jinping’s criticism is historic. Joe Biden recalled that Xi Jinping told him that democracies could not survive in the 21st century because reaching consensus was too difficult, while authoritarian countries could go faster. For Trump, democracy is a test of loyalty. For Xi Jinping, this is a museum exhibit: noble perhaps, certainly interesting, but too slow for centuries to come.Their foreign policy flows naturally from these temperaments. Trump wants a deal. Xi Jinping wants architecture. Trump wants visible concessions: purchases, tariff relief, a promise to build factories, a handshake he can sell to voters. Xi hopes for a slower, deeper shift: one that accepts China’s red lines, respects its status, and recognizes that Taiwan is not just a flashpoint but a sacred issue of national integrity. Trump’s time frame is the news cycle, market reaction and rally applause. Xi Jinping’s time horizon is the Party Congress, the five-year plan and the historical arc. Trump wants the trophy. Xi Jinping wants maps.

new world chaos

It is easy to understand that Trump and Xi Jinping are opposites: Trump is chaos, Xi Jinping is order; Trump is chaos, Xi Jinping is order; Trump is chaos, Xi Jinping is order; Trump is chaos, Xi Jinping is order. Trump improvises, Xi Jinping plans; Trump shouts, Xi Jinping preaches; Trump is the casino, Xi Jinping is the court. The further you read the more disturbing it becomes. They are competing answers to the same crisis. Both emerged at a time when the old liberal order no longer commanded automatic belief. Both speak of grievance. Neither trusts constraints. Both personalize power. Both view rules as tools created by others for their own benefit.The difference lies in the approach. Trump wants to start every morning in order with his mood. Xi Jinping hopes that China will have order in every century. Trump distorts reality by overwhelming it. Xi Jinping distorts reality through historicization. Trump turned politics into spectacle and attention into authority. Xi Jinping has turned politics into destiny, and authority has become inevitable.The situation of Tang Zi and Zhe Wang Xi happens when the old world loses confidence in its own rules. One man said there are no rules, only victory. Another said there are rules, but China sets the rules before you are born. The rest of the world sits between them, waiting to find out whether the future will be shaped by those who see geopolitics as a casino, or those who see geopolitics as a dynasty with broadband.

Trump in China: Why doesn’t Xi Jinping come to the airport to greet the US president? All we know is trade tensions and the Iran conflict

0

President of the United States Donald Trump Arriving in Beijing, this is the first visit to China by a US leader since taking office in 2017.

U.S. President Donald Trump walks with Chinese Vice President Han Zheng during an arrival ceremony at Capital International Airport in Beijing, China, on May 13, 2026. Reuters/Evan Vucci TPX Photo of the Day (Reuters)
U.S. President Donald Trump walks with Chinese Vice President Han Zheng during an arrival ceremony at Capital International Airport in Beijing, China, on May 13, 2026. Reuters/Evan Vucci TPX Photo of the Day (Reuters)

He will hold two days of discussions with the Chinese President Xi JinpingOriginally scheduled for March but postponed due to U.S. and Iranian attacks Israel.

What is the reason for Trump’s visit to China?

The main focus of the discussions is expected to be the tense trade relations between the two superpowers.

Trump mentioned that he would ask Xi Jinping to “open up” the Chinese economy to important technology companies.

Also read: Nancy Guthrie’s friend breaks silence as family begs for answers: ‘I’m trying to keep…’

He also said he wanted a broad discussion on Iran, although he insisted he was not asking for it Chinese Assist with conflict resolution.

Xi Jinping’s attitude toward Iran is “relatively positive,” he said, adding that it would be an “exciting trip” with many positive developments expected.

Xi is expected to advocate for the United States to halt arms sales to Taiwan and extend a trade truce agreed in October to prevent an escalation of tariffs between the United States and Taiwan. China.

Chinese media commentary also noted that Beijing is seeking a “better future” with the United States, aiming to build a relationship that can provide greater “stability and certainty” in an unpredictable world.

Trump gets red carpet welcome

Trump with the US delegation, which includes his son Eric Trump, daughter-in-law Lara Trump and technology entrepreneurs Elon Muskstepped off Air Force One and walked onto the paved red carpet.

They were welcomed by their seniors Chinese Officials and hundreds of young people waved American and Chinese flags and chanted in unison to tunes played by a military band. “Welcome, welcome, warm welcome!” they said.

Trump then entered a waiting vehicle and left in a motorcade. It is now evening in Beijing and a meeting with Xi Jinping is scheduled for tomorrow.

Chinese Vice President Han Zheng, U.S. Ambassador to China Perdue, Ambassador to the United States Xie Feng and others greeted the president on the tarmac.

Han Han is one of China’s top officials, and his mandate to welcome Trump was interpreted as a sign of Beijing’s respect for the U.S. leader.

Why didn’t Xi Jinping greet Trump at the airport?

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s decision not to greet Donald Trump at the airport is in line with China’s established diplomatic etiquette, where heads of state traditionally do not welcome visiting foreign leaders on the tarmac.

During Trump’s last visit in 2017, he sent a lower-ranking official, State Councilor Yang Jiechi.

In addition, Han also attended Trump’s inauguration last year.

Alien smuggling and child sex abuse material: Iranian national pleads guilty to two serious federal crimes in New York court

0

外国人走私和儿童性虐待材料:伊朗国民在纽约法院承认两项严重联邦罪行The accused was identified as Sharon Gohari. They are naturalized U.S. citizens living between Iran and Nassau County, New York.Authorities said Goharie conducted an ongoing scheme from at least December 2020 through May 2025 in which he solicited and received payments from Iranian nationals and others trying to enter the United States illegally. He arranged and facilitated their travel, including assisting with visa applications at the Mexican Embassy in Iran and organizing journeys into the United States through Mexico and other transit countries.Gohari worked with colleagues in Iran and elsewhere to charge thousands of dollars per client. At least one individual he assisted is alleged to have ties to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which is designated a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department. The man was later detained by U.S. border authorities.During the course of the investigation, federal agents also discovered child sexual abuse material on Gohari’s phone, including multiple videos depicting the rape of children. Some of the material involves children as young as five years old.Investigators found hundreds of photos and videos on his devices showing women in public places in New York City, including on trains and in cafes, that were recorded without their knowledge. Some of the photos were taken from close range or in a way that suggested the victim was being followed. Gohari shared some of the material with overseas accounts, including one based in Iran.In communications after receiving the child sexual abuse material, Gohari stated his intention to seek out a sexual partner at a high school.The case involves immigration-related crimes and child exploitation offences. The alien smuggling charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of three years and a maximum of 10 years in prison, while the child sexual abuse material charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years and a maximum of 20 years. Sentencing is scheduled for later.

Alex Murdaugh vs Becky Hill: Meet the judge behind explosive photo leaks and murder retrial

0

South Carolina Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned disgraced lawyer’s murder conviction and life sentence Alex Murdough His wife and young son were shot dead. In their unanimous ruling, the justices quoted the court clerk Becky Hill “A serious attack on Murdaugh’s credibility” by suggesting to jurors that his testimony was not credible. They also said the trial judge went too far in allowing evidence of Murdo’s financial crimes in his murder trial.

Alex Murdough's murder conviction overturned on Wednesday (File/AP)
Alex Murdough’s murder conviction overturned on Wednesday (File/AP)

But Murdough will not be released from prison. The 57-year-old is currently serving a 40-year federal sentence after admitting to stealing approximately $12 million from clients.

becky mountain link

Court clerk Becky Hill improperly influenced jurors in a high-profile South Carolina case, a court said. “While we understand the time, money and effort involved in this lengthy trial, due to Hill’s undue outside influence on the jury, we have no choice but to overturn the denial of Murdo’s motion for a new trial and demand a new trial,” the judges said.

Murdaugh was previously convicted of the June 2021 shooting deaths of his wife, Maggie Murdaugh, and their youngest son, Paul Murdaugh, at the family estate.

Who is Becky Hill?

Hill served as the Colleton County Clerk of Court during the murder trial. Prosecutors and defense attorneys later accused her of using the case to build her reputation and financial opportunities. She ultimately pleaded guilty to four state charges related to obstruction of justice, perjury and misconduct in office.

Authorities said Hill improperly shared photos of sealed evidence with members of the media while also using his position to write a book centered on Murdaugh’s murder.

Her book, “Behind the Gates of Justice: The Murdeau Murder Case,” was published five months after Murdough’s conviction.

Hill resigned from office on March 25, 2024, as investigations into Hill’s conduct intensified in multiple states.

In December 2025, she was sentenced to three years’ probation and ordered to complete 100 hours of community service.

Defense accuses Hill of influencing jurors

Murdaugh’s defense team argued throughout the appeal that Hill tried to improperly steer jurors toward a guilty verdict.

Attorneys Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin claimed Hill maintained inappropriate communications with jury members, including multiple interactions with the jury foreman.

They claim Hill “frequently had private conversations with the jury foreman.”

“Ms. Hill did these things to secure a book deal and media appearances for herself that would not have occurred if the trial had failed,” the attorneys argued. “For money and reputation, Hill betrayed her oath of office.”

Jurors reveal what happened during trial

During post-conviction hearings, all 12 jurors in the original murder trial were questioned about Hill’s alleged comments and actions. One juror acknowledged that Hill’s comments affected her decision-making process. Two other people testified that they heard Hill discuss the trial, and Murdaugh himself testified, though both said those statements ultimately did not affect their verdicts.

The remaining nine jurors denied hearing any inappropriate comments from Hill.

The ruling now plunges one of the nation’s most high-profile murder cases back into legal uncertainty, with a retrial date still unclear.

Murdough remains in jail

Although the conviction was overturned, Murdaugh will not be released from prison.

The disgraced former lawyer is currently serving a 40-year solitary sentence for numerous financial crimes related to fraud and theft charges involving clients and colleagues.

The retrial will determine whether prosecutors can convict Maggie and Paul Murdaugh again in the murders without letting the controversy surrounding Hill cloud the proceedings.

London man shot dead outside father’s restaurant after family refused to pay £100,000 to Turkish gang

0

家人拒绝向土耳其团伙支付10万英镑后,伦敦男子在父亲的餐厅外被枪杀Beytullah Gunduz, 39, who prosecutors say has links to the Hackney Turks gang, also known as Bombacilar or the “Bombers,” has been charged with plotting to murder restaurant owner Onur Guzel following a bitter turf dispute involving rival Turkish gangs, Sky News reported.The gang suspected Guzel’s family of supporting rival Tottenham Turks financially and allegedly demanded an “eye-watering” sum weeks before the shooting, according to Old Bailey prosecutors.The attack took place outside the family-run Umut 2000 restaurant in Dalston on June 20 last year. CCTV footage played in court reportedly showed Guzel lying on the pavement, shot in the torso and screaming in agony.Although Guzel survived, he suffered life-changing injuries and is now reportedly living with an ostomy bag.Gunduz dismissed a charge of conspiracy to murder and a separate charge of conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm.The accused gunman, Dogan Over, did not face trial because he is believed to have fled to Istanbul after the attack. Prosecutors said the white Kia Niro used in the shooting was burned minutes later.The court also heard the Guzel family and their restaurant had been targeted in two previous shootings linked to tensions between London’s Turkish gangs.Prosecutor Jane Bickerstaff KC told jurors that Gunduz and an associate initially approached the family after the shooting at the Guzel brothers’ home on April 5, allegedly blaming the Tottenham Turks and offering help.However, after another shooting at the restaurant on April 7, the gang allegedly accused Guzel’s father of secretly paying their rival.“His father denied giving the money, but the people he spoke to did not seem to believe him,” the prosecutor told the court. “They said Tottenham Hotspur were their enemy and gave his father a week to give them £100,000.”According to reports, Guzel had met Guenduz earlier on the day of the shooting but did not notice the attacker while talking on the phone outside the restaurant.“He just heard a loud bang and immediately felt a fever. He knew it was blood and realized he had been shot,” the prosecutor told the jury. The trial is currently underway.

Immigration lawyers defend H1-B visas, say India’s ‘strong’ education system gives workers advantage over Americans

0

移民律师为H1-B签证辩护,称印度“强大”的教育体系让工人比美国人更有优势

Immigration lawyer Deepika Singh says Indians have academic advantage over Americans

A Silicon Valley immigration lawyer believes Indian professionals on H-1B visas have an advantage over some U.S. workers because of India’s “robust” education system. This argument has a long history in the debate over foreign workers in the U.S. tech industry.Bay Area immigration advocates discuss role of Indian immigrants in U.S. economy Deepika Singh Said that the Indian community has played an important role in the development of the country through education, hard work and business leadership.In an interview with British News and US journalist Steven Edgington, Deepika said: “I think the Indian community has really contributed to the development of the United States, just because we have a lot of academics, right? All Indians are highly educated and I think we have been a very high contributor to the American economy.” If you look at a lot of our big companies, a lot of CEOs are Indian. “The discussion focused on the long-running controversy surrounding the H-1B visa, which allows U.S. companies to hire skilled foreign workers, particularly in the technology sector. Most of the applicants for these visas are Indian or Chinese. MAGA supporters claim such visas reduce opportunities for American workers.Asked whether Indian workers on H-1B visas were doing jobs that Americans couldn’t do, Singh said some foreign workers did have advantages shaped by India’s academic culture.Deepika said, “Some of it yes. The education system in India is very robust. To me, the focus has always been on academics, right? For us, when we went to school, our parents were like, ‘Hey, take care of everything else, but just focus on your studies,’ right? So I guess Indians are born that way. We are adapted to learn quickly and we can grasp things easily.”She added: “I think the salary level and all of that…I would say we have a stronger education-wise, right? I think yes, Indians do have an advantage over some other applicants when it comes to filing H-1B.”Singer rejects the idea that immigrants are replacing American employees. She said outsourcing and recruiting overseas are just business decisions.“There’s a business rationale for outsourcing work to India or sending work back to India, right? You have to have the need for it,” she said. “I’m an American, I come to work every day, I do my job. I don’t think I’ve replaced any American workers here. I’ve come here, I’ve worked, I’ve been through the system, I’ve acclimated, and I’m still working.”U.S. President Donald Trump proposed a major policy change in September 2025 to impose a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications submitted by workers outside the United States. That’s a huge jump from the previous cost of several thousand dollars.

Nancy Guthrie’s friend breaks silence as family begs for answers: ‘I’m trying to keep…’

0

while searching Nancy Guthrie While still active after she disappeared from her residence in Arizona, several reports have emerged about the deep connections she maintains within the local community. Tucson.

Nancy Guthrie's case remains active as friend Lauren Serpa highlights declining public interest. The Guthrie family asked friends for privacy, and she encouraged the community to remain vigilant and assist in the search, according to reports. (Reuters)
Nancy Guthrie’s case remains active as friend Lauren Serpa highlights declining public interest. The Guthrie family asked friends for privacy, and she encouraged the community to remain vigilant and assist in the search, according to reports. (Reuters)

However, not many of her friends or acquaintances have reached out to the media about her disappearance. one Guthrie’s Parr chose to address the issue publicly last month.

Also read: Rodney Barna’s killer arrested in Panama 30 years later: Everything we know about Michigan’s ‘ghost’ fugitive

Who is Lauren Serpa? Here’s what Nancy Guthrie’s friends have to say about her disappearance

Guthrie’s Friend Lauren Serpa opened up about her relationship with Guthrie in the Irish Star. Since her disappearance, Serpa has shared posts about her missing friend on social media. However, she did not interact with the media for several weeks. That changed on May 12, when she provided Page Six with her concerns about the current status of the case, stressing that the public was losing interest in the case.

“Even in Tucson where this is happening, it’s starting to fade away and I don’t want that to happen. It’s been 100 days and people are starting to stop forgetting but also not thinking about it. Basically, people are starting to move on. That’s what happens when it doesn’t affect their lives. So that’s why I’m trying to keep it at the forefront as much as possible,” Serpa said.

Serpa continued to speak to the media, detailing her belief in the importance of considering the case. “It’s important that it’s always in the back of their mind, just in case they do see something or hear someone say something outside of their line of sight. Then they can report it. But, you know, if they don’t take that into consideration, then they’re not even going to consider anything that someone else might say.”

Serpa explained why she urged people to “be aware of your surroundings” and pass on any new details they may notice about the case. “Really listen to what those people who are standing in line behind you are saying. I think those things will have an impact on this case.”

Nancy Guthrie’s friends ask for silence

The development comes as new reports suggest Nancy’s friends have been asked to remain silent about the case for the time being. NewsNation’s Brian Entin, speaking with Parade’s Effie Orfanides, said his sources indicate the request was made by Guthrie family.

“We’ve heard from several people that the Guthrie family is now asking Nancy’s close friends to keep it secret. You haven’t seen a lot of her close friends come forward and talk about her, unlike other cases,” he said.

On Mother’s Day, Savannah She paid tribute to her 84-year-old mother in a touching Instagram post about her mother and the ongoing search. A TV journalist is asking for help in finding her missing mother.

“Mother, daughter, sister, Noni – we miss you with every breath we take. We will never stop looking for you. We will never be at peace until we find you,” she wrote in the post, which shared videos and photos of Guthrie and her family.

“We need help. Someone knows something that can make a difference. Please call 1800 CALLFBI. You can remain anonymous and rewards are still available. Please continue to pray. Bring her home,” she added.

oops! …Pakistan does it again: “deny, divert, get caught” pattern repeats

0

oops! ...Pakistan does it again:

Pakistan has a strange gift: when the world starts to take it seriously, it produces an “oops” moment so spectacular that the script writes itself. A week after it positioned itself as a key mediator between the United States and Iran, the next, a U.S. senator publicly asked whether it had quietly parked Iranian military aircraft at its air bases. Recent events may not come as a surprise to many, as Pakistan’s strategic doctrine is often akin to a friend telling a serious lie, being caught on CCTV, but still insisting that everyone else has misunderstood the situation. Whether harboring terrorists, denying military links or claiming neutrality when picking sides, Islamabad has perfected the art of saying “nothing is happening here” even though satellite images and foreign intelligence suggest otherwise.That’s why U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham’s blunt statement on Tuesday — “I don’t trust Pakistan” — is what’s coming. The direct trigger was the latest report that during the confrontation between the United States and Iran, Iranian military aircraft, including reconnaissance aircraft, were allowed to take refuge at Nurhan Air Base in Pakistan. But the reason is simple: For many countries from New Delhi to Washington, Pakistan’s credibility carries a permanent asterisk: Treat it with caution, and have a long history.

Iranian plane parked at Pakistan Air Force base

CBS News reported that during the ceasefire phase of the US-Iran conflict, Iranian military aircraft used Pakistani facilities including Nurhan Air Base, which caused controversy. The suggestion is explosive: A country that bills itself as a neutral intermediary in peace talks may have been quietly helping Tehran protect strategic assets from possible attacks by the United States.Pakistan, of course, denies this. Its foreign ministry said the aircraft and personnel were related only to diplomatic logistics for the Islamabad Talks, back-channel negotiations chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Army Chief Asim Munir. It called the military angle “misleading and sensational.”This scrutiny has been heightened since Asim Munir is not an ordinary military chief in the current system. His recent elevation in Pakistan’s power structure, with the military increasingly eclipsing civilian authority under Sherbaz Sharif, has reinforced the idea that foreign policy, security decision-making and even crisis diplomacy are being conducted through the military rather than the democratically elected government.

Asim Munir

But the trust deficit runs so deep that Islamabad’s denials are no longer enough. U.S. officials are increasingly suspicious that Pakistani intermediaries are softening Iran’s stance and conveying a more “rosy” picture to the Trump administration than Tehran actually offers, CNN reported. Several Trump officials now believe Pakistani intermediaries were not forceful enough in conveying Trump’s frustrations to Iranian negotiators, according to CNN sources.In other words, Pakistan is accused not only of facilitating diplomacy but also of using public opinion to buy Iran time.

The argument that “terrorists don’t exist” collapsed in a few days

For India, the freshest example is in operation sindor. India attacked terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir after the Pahalgam terror attack, and Islamabad’s official response was immediate and unequivocal: there are no terrorist camps, no terrorist commanders, and India is targeting civilians.And then there’s the funeral video. Pakistani military personnel, including uniformed officers, were seen attending the funeral of terrorists with links to banned groups. For India, this is a perfect display of a familiar contradiction: harboring terrorists while denying the existence of such an ecosystem.

Abbottabad Template

Long before Operation Sindoor or the Iranian aircraft dispute, there was an event that raised suspicion among Americans for a generation: Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad.For years, Pakistan insisted that the al-Qaida leader was not on its soil at all. However, in 2011, U.S. Navy SEALs discovered that he was living in a compound not far from the Pakistan Military Academy.

The CIA has released an aerial view of Osama bin Laden's Abbottabad compound.

The Americans did not notify Pakistan before the attack, fearing that someone within the regime had tipped him off.This remains perhaps the most famous “oops” incident in intelligence history. Pakistan either didn’t know that the world’s most wanted terrorist lived next to one of its main military establishments, or it did know and concealed it. Neither explanation inspires confidence.

Double Game as Doctrine

Complicating the dual game is Pakistan’s own third-line security crisis, a kind of domestic “three-body problem” that the Pakistani military has been trying to contain. On one side is the Afghan Taliban regime, whose return to power has not translated into strategic calm in Islamabad; on the other is the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which has stepped up attacks inside Pakistan and in the southwest, where the long-standing Baloch insurgency continues to challenge state control.

Pakistan’s three-body problem

With the crisis coming from three directions, Pakistan’s establishment is struggling to manage external influences while putting out fires at home.This recurring pattern has led many analysts to believe that Pakistan’s “double game” is not accidental but structural. It has long used non-state actors, strategic ambiguity and carefully calibrated deniability as tools of statecraft.During the U.S. war in Afghanistan, Pakistan was designated a major non-NATO ally while being accused of allowing the Taliban leadership and the Haqqani network to operate on its soil. U.S. aid is pouring in; rebel sanctuaries are said to remain. By the time Kabul fell in 2021, strategic circles in Washington had largely accepted Pakistan’s role as both sponsor and ally.The same script appears to be playing out again in 2026.Pakistan wants to be seen as an integral part of Washington while also retaining influence over Tehran, Beijing, Gulf states and domestic constituencies. It tries to be a conduit for everyone and no one’s enemy. But Islamabad’s behavior often leaves the opposite impression: It tells different truths to different capitals. Pakistan likes to portray itself as a bridge between the Muslim world and the West, between rivals, between war and diplomacy. But it only works if both sides believe the bridge will hold.Today, that trust is clearly eroding. In Washington, some members of the Trump administration are reportedly considering whether Pakistan should continue to play a central role in the U.S.-Iran channel. Pakistan’s internal instability will only deepen this distrust. Imran Khan’s removal from office and jailing after a clash with the military establishment has heightened the awareness that the real power in Islamabad still lies not with elected leaders but with the generals in Rawalpindi.

Imran Khan is in jail.

For outside powers, this means that any diplomatic assurances from Pakistan come with an obvious question: Who really speaks for the country?

Bonus: An “oops” moment that became a global meme

Some of Pakistan’s credibility crisis is geopolitical. Others take matters into their own hands, eschewing diplomacy altogether and entering into meme culture. Islamabad’s global image has been tarnished in recent years not only by accusations of double-dealing but also by a series of fast-spreading communications missteps.The freshest occurred in April 2026, when Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif briefly posted a seemingly unedited draft message on X while commenting on the US-Iran ceasefire. The post, which was widely shared online, was reportedly labeled “Draft – Message from Pakistan Prime Minister on X” before being edited, fueling speculation that Islamabad accidentally released an internal script at a sensitive diplomatic moment.

Screenshot from X.

Back in September 2017, Pakistan suffered one of its most high-profile diplomatic setbacks at the United Nations. Its envoy Maleha Lodi held up a photograph as evidence of Indian atrocities in Kashmir. The photo was quickly identified as that of a Palestinian girl injured in Gaza in 2014, turning Pakistan’s rebuttal into international humiliation.

Screen capture from United Nations live broadcast.

For Pakistan, the real issue is no longer any single allegation, whether about Iranian planes, terrorist sanctuaries or diplomatically mixed messages. Decades of strategic ambiguity have created credibility traps where every denial is now fraught with doubt and every crisis threatens to become another global “bad” moment.

Mexico City’s secret underground world: ancient temples, ritual skulls and lost civilizations still hidden beneath modern streets | World News

0

Mexico City’s secret underground world: ancient temples, ritual skulls and a lost civilization still hidden beneath modern streets

Beneath Mexico City’s modern skyline, something ancient still lingers. On the surface it is a crowded capital city, full of traffic, offices and constant movement. But just a few meters below, there seems to be another world where time has almost frozen. Ancient temples, underground courtyards, carved stones and ritual remains are hidden beneath layers of concrete and history. It is invisible in everyday life, yet it keeps reappearing in fragments. Workers excavating foundations often uncover unexpected traces of the past. Archaeologists say the city is like a living archive, with each excavation opening a new chapter of an ancient civilization that never completely disappeared.

The buried history of Tenochtitlan under the development of modern Mexico City

The center of Mexico City is located directly above Tenochtitlan, the former capital of Mexico. It was a powerful and well-organized city built on islands in the lake. Experts believe it was one of the most advanced urban settlements in the Americas before the Spanish conquest. After the Spanish arrived, much of the old city was demolished or buried under new construction. Churches, palaces and roads were built directly over sacred Mexica spaces. Over time, the original city became hidden beneath the growing colonial capital.Even today, traces of that ancient world continue to appear, according to the BBC . Archaeologists working near the historic center have discovered the remains of temple platforms, ritual objects and ceremonial buildings. The findings show that much of the ancient city remains untouched beneath modern structures. It’s a layered landscape where past and present actually occupy the same land.

Underground temple beneath Mexico City Metropolitan Cathedral

One of the most striking examples of this hidden history lies beneath the Metropolitan Cathedral in Mexico City. Archaeologists have discovered remains related to the Great Temple, the main religious center of the Mexica civilization. This temple was once located in the center of Tenochtitlan and was dedicated to a powerful deity. Today, parts of its base still exist underground, beneath busy streets and religious buildings.Visitors can now take guided tours of these underground spaces. As they descend below the ground, the noise of the city fades away, replaced by stone walls and ancient foundations. Some describe the experience as disturbing, while others find it fascinating. Experts say these underground ruins help reconstruct how the ancient city was once organized. They also illustrate modern Mexico City’s strong ties to its pre-Hispanic past.

Skulls, ball courts and rituals discovered beneath Mexico City

Over the years, excavations have revealed surprising and sometimes shocking discoveries. Archaeologists have discovered a large skull skeleton believed to have been used for ritual display. Hundreds of skulls were found, arranged in a structured pattern, suggesting they were once part of a ceremonial platform. Remains of a ball court, an ancient Mesoamerican ball game played using heavy rubber balls and physical skills, were also discovered nearby.Other finds include ritual offerings placed near the temple steps. These include animal bones, shells, coral and carefully arranged objects. Some finds suggest links to important rulers of the Mexican civilization. Experts believe that more structures, including possible tombs, may still be hidden beneath the city. Each dig seemed to add another piece to a larger puzzle that was yet to be completed.

Sunken city reveals secrets beneath Mexico City

Mexico City’s complex geology makes this process even more challenging. Mexico City sits on a former lake bed that slowly sank at different rates in different places. Buildings tilted, roads developed cracks and underground utilities shifted. According to archaeologists, some buried artifacts were exposed due to the constant shifting of the foundations.Today, technological advancements are used to survey underground areas through radar and 3D scanners. Despite technological advances, mining is still done manually because signals can be misread. Some artifacts from the colonial era may be considered older.

Daily life in Mexico City’s buried civilization

What is unusual about Mexico City is how daily life continues directly on top of this hidden history. As people commute, shop and work, they are often unaware that they are walking through one of the most important archaeological sites in the world. Metro stations sometimes display ancient symbols, and some underground areas reveal parts of pre-Hispanic architecture behind glass panels.Experts say the constant overlap of past and present gives the city its unique identity. It is not only a modern capital, but also a place built on centuries of stratified civilization. The remains of Tenochtitlan are not separate from present-day Mexico City. They were part of it and still influence its structure and story.In the end, Mexico City feels like a place where two timelines exist simultaneously. One is visible, the other is buried. Even now, much of this ancient world remains undiscovered, quietly waiting beneath the streets for the next unexpected discovery.