Home Blog Page 831

India vs Pakistan T20 World Cup Final Loading? Exact scene explanation

0

India vs Pakistan T20 World Cup Final Loading? Exact scene explanation

Can India and Pakistan spark another blockbuster cricket showdown at the 2026 T20 World Cup? The possibility still exists, but several pieces must fall into place.So far, the South African national cricket team and the England cricket team have confirmed their semi-final spots. That leaves two spots up for grabs, with the Indian, West Indies, Pakistan and New Zealand national cricket teams still in contention.

India lands in Kolkata and has a life-or-death conflict with the Indian Army. The semi-final spot has been locked

England completed the Super Eights stage with a four-wicket win over New Zealand at the R Premadasa Stadium in Colombo to reach the semi-finals with three wins from three matches.New Zealand is in second place with three points. Meanwhile, Pakistan remains mathematically active—but only just.To qualify, Pakistan must beat Sri Lanka in the final match of the Super Eights, and do so by a huge margin. Their net run rate of -0.461 pales in comparison to New Zealand’s +1.390. This disparity means that Pakistan not only needs a big win but also must hope for New Zealand’s disastrous defeat in their last match. If it fails, Pakistan’s campaign will end immediately.

India T20 World Cup semi-final qualifying scenario

Defending champions India defeated Zimbabwe by 72 runs at the MA Chidambaram Stadium.After West Indies suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of South Africa, the equation is simple for the Suryakumar Yadav-led side: beat West Indies in the final Super Eight match at the Eden Gardens on March 1 and they will advance to the semi-finals regardless of the scoreline.However, if heavy rain collapses the match, West Indies will take three points and seal qualification.

Can India and Pakistan meet again in T20 World Cup?

A clash between India and Pakistan is possible – but only if both teams reach the knockout stages.If Pakistan somehow makes it to the top two in Group 2 and India makes it out of the group, the two teams could face off in the following games:Semifinals – Dependent on final group standings.Final – if both teams win their respective semi-finals.For now, India’s path appears clear. Pakistan, on the other hand, will need to perform well and get good results elsewhere to keep hopes of another high-pressure clash between cricket’s fiercest rivals alive.

Troops fire on ‘drone’ along Line of Control; search for airdrops

0

Jammu: Vigilance forces spotted a suspicious drone along the route control line (LoC) in Gulpur area of ​​Poonch district of J&K on Friday and fired several bullets at it. However, the drone cannot be shot down.The drone then traveled to Siriyan village in Gulpur and allegedly entered the other side of the Line of Actual Control, officials said. “Security forces have stepped up surveillance of the area and launched search operations in the area to ensure there are no airdrops of weapons or drugs,” an official said.Earlier this month, J&K police and BSFOn February 14, during a joint operation near the international border in RS Pura area of ​​Jammu, around 6 kg of drone-dropped drugs worth around Rs 40 crore were recovered.

Who are Anna Kasparian and Kelly Prejean? Candace Owens’ photo goes viral; ‘Wouldn’t trade soul for money’

0

Recently, X sparked a social media frenzy with a viral photo of Anna Kasparian and Carrie Prejean hanging out with conservative commentators Candace Owensthe title is a message that suggests unity across political divides.

X A last photo of Anna Kasparian, Carrie Prejean and Candace Owens playing the three brave souls went viral, sparking criticism on social media. (Kelly Prejean | X)
X A last photo of Anna Kasparian, Carrie Prejean and Candace Owens playing the three brave souls went viral, sparking criticism on social media. (Kelly Prejean | X)

Owens is a prominent conservative activist known for his polarizing comments and search for the truth behind the assassination of another conservative commentator, Charlie Kirk.

Read more: TPUSA’s Erika Kirk Pays Influencers to Call Candace Owens “Devil”?

Who are Anna Kasparian and Kelly Prejean?

Anna Kasparian

Ana Kasparian is a well-known American political commentator, media host and journalist. She is best recognized for her work as co-host and producer of the popular online news program The Young Turks (TYT).

Kasparian spent his career as a journalist providing political commentary and analysis on topics ranging from domestic policy to international affairs, becoming a respected figure among progressive media audiences.

She criticized both political parties, although she was a Democrat until she began to be designated as “politically non-aligned” in 2024.

Kelly Prejean

Carrie Prejean rose to fame as a beauty pageant winner, winning the Miss title california Miss USA 2009 and was the first runner-up of Miss USA 2009.

Prejean’s influence across the country was heightened when her answer to same-sex marriage in the Miss America pageant sparked a heated debate over social values ​​and political expression.

Prejean’s personal life has been under public scrutiny since marrying former NFL quarterback Kyle Boller in 2010, with whom he has two children.

Prejean was a devout Catholic. She officially joined the Catholic Church in 2025 and has been advocating for religious freedom and conservative values ​​ever since.

Prejean was also appointed chairman Donald Trump’s Religious Freedom Committee; however, she was removed from her position during a hearing earlier this month for discussing what anti-Semitism is. Prejean defended Owens, who often spread anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

Read more: Candace Owens spills the beans on Trump’s SOTU speech, reveals Erika Kirk’s plans

Social media reaction to Prejean’s post

Prejean’s tweet featuring Kasparian and Owens sparked a wave of criticism on social media. In the post, Prejean called the three women “three brave women who wouldn’t sell their souls for money or applause.”

A user on X, The Older Millennial, criticized the post and wrote“Did you just post a photo and call yourself one of the ‘Three Brave Women’? Oh my God, how much attention do you crave?”

Another user on X, Liberal Tear Creator, criticized the three women for their political stance, explain”, “Ana Kasparian celebrates the decline of Christianity in America and Candace Owens denigrates Christian family men who criticize her as a devil and a pedophile. Carrie Prejean lied about nude photos to enter a beauty pageant, then lied again and played the victim when she was caught. “

Another X user, Gunpowder and Prayers, wrote“None of you are brave people, you all sold your souls for money and applause. You are not for humanity, Gaza, America or truth. You are all for yourselves and your own interests.”

Say goodbye to giant burger billboards: Abu Dhabi bans junk food advertising, billboards to become sugar-free in new public health policy to target obesity

0

Say goodbye to giant burger billboards: Abu Dhabi bans junk food advertising, billboards to become sugar-free in new public health policy to target obesity
A health revolution? Abu Dhabi halts junk food promotions

In a landmark shift towards proactive public health policy, Abu Dhabi has announced a blanket ban on outdoor advertising of junk food and unhealthy drinks across the emirate, one of the most ambitious food marketing restrictions in the region. The initiative was launched under the Abu Dhabi Healthy Living Programme, led by the Ministry of Health, and aims to reduce the visibility of fast food and other nutritionally deficient products in public places. This is a strategic effort to combat obesity, diabetes and other diet-related chronic diseases that put a strain on individuals and the health care system.Under the new rules, any product deemed unhealthy based on strict nutritional thresholds, including high in calories, fat, saturated fat, sodium or sugar, can no longer be advertised outdoors, whether on billboards, digital screens, street furniture or traffic shelters. Products that meet health classifications (Grade A or B under the Abu Dhabi SEHHI Nutritional Profile System) are the only products allowed to be displayed in outdoor advertising, and even these must meet detailed content standards.

Scope and rationale for Abu Dhabi advertising ban

Banning junk food advertising is part of a wider public health strategy to reshape the food environment and the way food and drink is presented, marketed and consumed in everyday life. Officials at Healthy Living Abu Dhabi believe reducing public exposure to unhealthy food advertising can make it easier for residents and visitors to make healthier choices in their daily lives. Dr. Ahmed Hazraj, executive director of the project, emphasized that the policy is not about blaming individuals but about redesigning the environment so that healthy decisions become the default.

Key elements of the policy include –

  • Outdoor advertising ban: Unhealthy food and beverage products as defined by SEHHI Class C, D or E cannot be promoted in outdoor media.
  • Nutrition labeling label: Front-of-pack labeling supports regulators and consumers by classifying products from A (most nutritious) to E (least healthy).
  • Media and brand restrictions: Even purely brand ads without product images can be restricted if they promote unhealthy products.
  • Linking supermarket and school policies: The initiative extends to supermarkets to relocate unhealthy items away from high-traffic areas and complements efforts to simultaneously improve the quality of food in schools.

The comprehensive strategy also includes the implementation of stricter nutritional standards in schools and workplaces, community fitness programs and expanded public health awareness campaigns, all part of Abu Dhabi’s wider ambition to create a healthier and more active society.

A comprehensive approach to reducing dietary risks in Abu Dhabi

Public health research increasingly emphasizes the role of food marketing in shaping consumption habits. Research shows that advertising exposure, especially for foods high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS), may influence cravings and dietary choices, particularly among children and adolescents. Similar advertising restrictions in other countries aim to reduce such exposure and encourage healthier dietary patterns, although their effectiveness depends on full implementation and complementary measures.

Fast food faces new hurdles as Abu Dhabi imposes strict advertising restrictions

Fast food faces new hurdles as Abu Dhabi imposes strict advertising restrictions

Abu Dhabi’s approach goes beyond limiting advertising: it seeks to restructure how food is marketed and perceived in everyday environments. By eliminating the ubiquitous outdoor promotion of unhealthy products, authorities aim to reduce the social normalization of impulse buying and poor dietary choices. There is growing evidence that such environmental interventions may help reduce obesity rates and reduce the burden of diet-related non-communicable diseases, but results need to be tracked over time.The emirate’s ban could significantly reduce visual cues that lead to unhealthy eating in public places. Public health advocates argue that an environment rife with fast-food promotions normalizes high-calorie diets, contributing to rising rates of obesity and chronic disease worldwide. By restricting such advertising, Abu Dhabi aims to promote society’s shift towards healthier living.The policy reflects a wider trend for governments to play a more assertive role in shaping the food environment. Like other countries’ policies to restrict unhealthy food advertising, Abu Dhabi’s initiative recognizes that personal choices are influenced by marketing and visibility. By addressing the “foodscape” itself rather than just individual behaviour, the UAE aims to achieve a cultural shift in how health and diet are understood and communicated.For food and beverage companies, the ban means rethinking outdoor marketing strategies in one of the UAE’s most influential emirates. Traditional advertising channels such as billboards, street signage and outdoor displays will no longer serve as platforms for unhealthy products. Brands will need to move to permitted channels or reformulate products to meet healthier categories under the Nutri-Mark system. This change represents both a regulatory challenge and an opportunity for product development and marketing innovation.

Challenges and the road ahead

While the advertising ban is broad and ambitious, some public health experts warn that advertising restrictions must be part of a broader, multi-pronged strategy that includes education, access to healthy foods and ongoing monitoring to achieve measurable health improvements. Similar policies elsewhere have faced criticism that ad bans alone may have limited effectiveness without supporting measures such as price incentives, improved nutrition in schools and restrictions on digital advertising.

No more burger billboards: Abu Dhabi cracks down on junk food marketing

No more burger billboards: Abu Dhabi cracks down on junk food marketing

Still, by integrating public health considerations into everyday settings, from billboards to supermarket aisles, Abu Dhabi’s policies could set a precedent for how cities and countries implement preventive health policies in the 21st century. Abu Dhabi has banned outdoor advertising of junk food and unhealthy drinks as part of its healthy living plan.Under the system associated with nutrition label classification, products that exceed strict nutritional thresholds are no longer allowed to appear on billboards, street advertising or public displays. The policy complements broader public health efforts, including supermarket layout changes and school nutrition rules. Officials aim to change social norms around eating and reduce the burden of obesity, diabetes and other chronic diseases.

‘Topless’ protest: Youth Congress chief Uday Bhanu Chibu granted bail

0

New Delhi: Indian Youth Congress president Uday Bhanu Chib, who was arrested for protesting topless at the Bharat Mandapam during the Artificial Intelligence Summit, was granted bail on Saturday.Lawyer Sulaiman Mohammad Khan said the duty magistrate granted Chib bail after the Delhi crime branch failed to provide any sufficient reason for seeking police custody of the IYC national president.Khan said, “We have also filed an application seeking bail to the President of the country Uday Bhanu Chib. The duty judge was pleased to grant bail to Uday Banu Chib and explained in the bail order that we have just read that the crime branch of the police was unable to explain the reasons for seeking extension of bail to Uday Banu Chib.”delhi police The crime branch has moved an application to extend the PC remand of National Youth Congress president Uday Bhanu Chib. They sought an extension of the criminal remand period by seven days and made two applications for remand of one accused for five days and the other for two days…” he added.Khan also added that he had to hand over certain conditions. passport and electronic items, he had to produce a surety of Rs 50,000 before the court.Advocate Roopesh Singh Bhadauria stressed that Chib had been in police custody for four days. He was initially expected to appear before a duty judge at 6am, but the hearing was brought forward to 1.30am.“Uday Bhanu Chib was not arrested for the first time. He has been in PC for four days now. We received a message at 12 midnight that he would be produced before the duty magistrate around 6 am. Thankfully, we at least heard from him as we did not even receive news about the others. Then, at 12:30 we got a call saying he would be delivered at 1am. We arrived in panic. His hearing begins at 1:30...” he said.According to Delhi Police, Chibhu was the “main conspirator and mastermind” behind the February 20 Bharat Mandapam protests. They said anti-national slogans were raised and attempts were made to create a riotous situation. Police claimed that he conspired with Shree Krishna Hari, Kundan Yadav, Narsimha Yadav, Ajay Kumar Yadav and others to obstruct and attack the policemen on duty.exist Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit On February 20, several men allegedly entered the venue wearing T-shirts with the Prime Minister’s face on them. Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump, as well as slogans against the government and the Indo-US trade deal.

Humanity vs. Trump: Claude Meck’s biggest rival weighs in; Sam Altman expresses concerns

0

president Donald Trump The U.S. government has announced it will cease use of Anthropic’s artificial intelligence technology in all federal systems, following a high-profile dispute with the Department of Defense (DoD) over ethical limits on the use of artificial intelligence.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at the U.S. Federal Reserve meeting (AFP)
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at the U.S. Federal Reserve meeting (AFP)

In a statement issued through his social platform Truth Social, Trump directed federal agencies to phase out Anthropic’s tools within six months and threatened the company to face broader consequences if it did not comply.

Anthropic, the leading AI startup behind the Claude model, emphasizes the safety guardrails of its AI.

Read more: Humanity and Pentagon battle over how useful AI can be in monitoring U.S. citizens in war

Pentagon issues ultimatum on humanity and moral red lines

Defense Department officials set a deadline for Anthropic at 5:01 p.m. ET on Friday to lift restrictions on the use of its artificial intelligence model, Claude, for fully autonomous weapons or domestic mass surveillance.

While the Pentagon says it doesn’t plan to use AI in these ways, it does require AI companies to use its models “for all lawful purposes.”

minister of defense Peter Heggs Demand that Anthropic remove longstanding ethical red lines around large-scale domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei publicly rejected the request, saying the company “cannot in good conscience agree” to a request that could compromise security and democratic values.

Sam Altman aligns with Anthropic on ethical use of AI

The obsolescence affects Anthropic’s Claude AI, a competitor to OpenAI, Google and Elon Musk’s xAI models, and one of the few AI tools integrated into U.S. military systems and classified networks.

Sam AltmanOpenAI’s CEO expressed support for some of Anthropic’s ethical stances. Altman has publicly stated that he opposes “red lines” for unrestricted military use of artificial intelligence, similar to what Anthropic advocates, emphasizing the risks of mass surveillance and unauthorized weaponization.

On Friday morning, Altman told CNBC that companies should cooperate with the military “as long as they comply with legal protections.”

Read more: Anthropic rejects Pentagon’s latest proposal, artificial intelligence dispute escalates

“The United States of America will never allow the radical left, woke corporations…”

“The United States of America will never allow the radical left, woke corporations, to dictate how our great military fights and wins wars,” Trump wrote in his Truth Society post.

In the scathing post, the president accused Anthropic of trying to “strong-arm” the Pentagon and force it to comply with its terms of service.

“Therefore, I am directing every federal agency in the United States Government to immediately stop using Anthropic’s technology. We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and we will never do business with them again!” Trump wrote.

Trump announced that Anthropic’s products would be phased out within six months. “Humanity had better come together and help during this phase-out period, or I will use the full power of the President to bring them into compliance, with significant civil and criminal consequences to follow,” he wrote.

Under a $200 million Pentagon contract, Crowder was responsible for national security responsibilities such as cloud support and intelligence processing.

SC: The judiciary must not create an anti-investment atmosphere

0

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said that the Constitutional Court must be careful while conducting judicial review of laws to avoid creating an anti-investment atmosphere and should weigh national interest against hypothetical concerns about the legislation.CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi made these oral observations during the preliminary hearing of the PIL in EAS Sarma on Friday, with counsel Prashant Bhushan Bhushan pointed out that the responsibility of private companies operating nuclear power plants under the Sustainable Utilization and Advancement of Nuclear Transformation in India (SHANTI) Act passed by Parliament in December last year was wrong. Bhushan said that while nuclear power plant accidents could cost billions of rupees, the liability of private companies was capped at 3,000 billion rupees, citing the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear disasters. The government allowed private companies to participate in the nuclear energy sector but exempted them from strict civil liability provisions, he said, adding that the government’s liability was also capped at Rs 4,500 crore.“There must be an atmosphere in the country that encourages investors to invest,” CJI Kant said. SC says regulations must be in sync with other countries CJI Kant said: “Today, coal-fired power plants are no longer encouraged. We cannot do without nuclear power. Therefore, the approach has to maintain a balance – national interest versus hypothetical fears.” “We should not create an atmosphere where people are afraid to invest in India because the courts here interfere with everything. Despite huge investments, litigation drags on and projects become unviable.”“These are policy decisions — what our energy basket should be. Whether the policy is prejudicial or unconstitutional can be determined by review,” Judge Budge said.“Show us the regulatory framework for civil liability in countries like the United States, Europe and Japan. When electricity is traded across borders, India’s regulatory framework must be compatible with those of other countries. “Senior advocate Kapil Sibal tried to interject in support of Bhushan, but the bench stopped him, saying “let Bhushan assist us”. The judge asked Bhushan to provide details of regulatory frameworks for civilian nuclear liability regimes in other countries and postponed the hearing until next month.

Kill the monkey? Debunking a viral internet hoax; “There’s no way…”

0

After a video showing orphaned children, Punch the Monkey became an internet sensation and won hearts Japanese Macaques trying to settle in at the zoo. The clip shows punch After initially failing to gain approval from the other monkeys in his enclosure, he had to rely on his stuffed animals. The abandoned monkey was bullied and almost the whole world supported and cheered Punch.

A baby Japanese macaque named Punch sits next to a stuffed orangutan at the Ichikawa Zoo in Chiba Prefecture, Japan (Reuters)
A baby Japanese macaque named Punch sits next to a stuffed orangutan at the Ichikawa Zoo in Chiba Prefecture, Japan (Reuters)

The moment touched the hearts of many and Punch instantly became a favorite. Since then, people have been following regular updates about Punch, including that he made a new friend and found someone to care for him at the zoo. However, now a theory is going viral that Panch is dead.

ALSO READ | Let’s talk about Abandoned Monkey Punch

A page for the HFR Podcast on

The post, shared alongside a black-and-white photo of Punch and his toys, quickly went viral and sparked a backlash.

“Tell me this isn’t true,” one man pleads. Another added: “This can’t be possible…someone please tell me this isn’t real and happened to him???” Another asked “Does this work?”.

Kill the monkey? fact check

Although the post went viral and generated a lot of reactions, Punch the Monkey didn’t die. He is still alive.

The HFR Podcast mentions on its profile page that “Follow parody rap news, everything is fake. Not affiliated with the NFR Podcast.” Therefore, this post is a parody. Grok still fact-checked the story, and wrote “That’s not true! That’s a spoof account – everything they post is fake. Punch, the little monkey, is still alive in Japan and is going viral, still holding his baby monkey.” IKEA Plush toys in the zoo. “

Some users quickly discovered that the news was untrue, with some saying “Wait, this is fake. Post-punch is in Ichikawa, he’s not in Atlanta.”

Meanwhile, Punch Zoo has provided an update.

Zoo Punch Updates

The Ichikawa Zoo and Botanical Garden is responding to concerns about the health of Japanese macaques, including Punch.

On X, they wrote “Currently, many visitors come to the zoo to see the little monkey Punch,” the statement began, noting that many people have inquired about the health of Punch and his fellow macaques.

Authorities noted that “monkey welfare” remains their top priority. They also noted that they have four back rooms that are always open and used by Punch as a resting place. “Many trees used for environmental enrichment have become excellent play tools, especially for small monkeys, including Punch. We are always looking for the best ways to improve the environment,” they said.

Nancy Guthrie: Photo taken outside Savannah Guthrie’s mother’s house sparks outrage; ‘Kyla Day’s friend’

0

A woman and her photographer were spotted outside Nancy GuthrieHomes near Catalina Foothills Tucson, Arizona. The man appeared to be taking photos, angering many online. Meanwhile, authorities continue to search for “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie’s 84-year-old mother, who they believe was taken from their home the night before Feb. 1.

Outrage has been sparked after a couple were allegedly seen taking photos outside Nancy Guthrie's house. (X/@JLRINVESTIGATES, X/@Bria_Dear1992)
Outrage has been sparked after a couple were allegedly seen taking photos outside Nancy Guthrie’s house. (X/@JLRINVESTIGATES, X/@Bria_Dear1992)

“A woman and her photographer have just arrived at Nancy Guthrie’s home,” wrote an independent investigative reporter reporting there. He shared a photo of the two.

Another added, “Let’s see how quickly Chief Nanos investigates these two, this is something he will look into.”

The incident sparked outrage among many, with one writing: “This is what you do in front of a home for an 84-year-old missing lady? How disrespectful! Nothing wrong with taking a photo, but find another location! Time to close that street.”

one sarcastically commented “Imagine an 84 year old woman goes missing and her home is an active crime scene but you think it’s the perfect backdrop for your ‘edgy’ photo shoot. Absolutely zero respect for Nancy Guthrie or the family. @PimaSheriff is asking for space, not a fashion show. Do better.”

Another netizen criticized the behavior as “shameful” and wondered whether the pair’s identities had been discovered by online sleuths. Amid the heated discussions about the two people, people began to speculate that this person was kaila dayfriends.

Kayla Day Friends Buzz: Fact Check

One person commented on the photo of the two explain “Word on the street is that she and Keira Day are friends.”

other ask “Is this girl one of Keira’s friends”.

Kayla Noel Day is allegedly being held in connection with the kidnapping of Nancy Guthrie. However, any suggestion linking her to the two men seen today is incorrect.

Grok fact-checks speculation, explain “There is no public information or reports suggesting that the woman in the photo is friends with Kayla Day (or at all). Kayla’s alleged relationship is distant/unconfirmed family speculation at best, and she has a background as a Tucson tattoo artist herself, but there’s nothing connecting the model or photographer to her circle. The scene has only sparked backlash for the location online.”

The situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan escalates, and India pays close attention to it

0

India is paying close attention to the situation in Afghanistan Pakistan The situation appears to be about to escalate dangerously as Islamabad declares the two countries are in “open war” after Pakistan launched airstrikes on “terrorist hideouts” in Afghanistan and retaliated. Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have deteriorated sharply over the past few years. Pakistan blames ‘Islamic movement’Taliban (TTP) or the Pakistani Taliban launch terrorist attacks on its territory and have repeatedly launched targeted attacks against the TTP. Baloch insurgents have also found refuge in Afghanistan, reports Islamabad. Kabul responded largely with what it described as necessary and measured military action. This time, however, Pakistan is directly targeting not only terrorist infrastructure but also Afghan military installations in Kabul and other cities.

Afghanistan-Pakistan tensions escalate

India’s relationship with the Taliban has taken an alarming turn during this period, initially over its massive humanitarian aid to Kabul and now over the regime’s lack of international recognition for its commitment to the development needs of the Afghan people. India’s response to the Pakistan-Afghanistan crisis so far exemplifies this new reality that Islamabad must contend with. India continues to insist that Pakistan’s cross-border adventurism resulting in civilian casualties is nothing more than a ploy to divert attention from its domestic failures. India also firmly supports the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Afghanistan. The Taliban responded to these gestures by referring to Johnson & Johnson as part of India in a joint statement issued after Afghan Foreign Minister Aamir Khan Muttaq’s visit to India last October, much to Pakistan’s chagrin.However, while the hostile relationship between the two countries has allayed concerns about Pakistan’s long-term policy of using Afghanistan for strategic depth, a major military escalation that threatens regional stability is more than India can afford. In fact, this is the most inopportune time for India, as New Delhi looks to resume development efforts in the country after a period of relative peace.Importantly, India is considering a Taliban proposal to invest in the mining industry, something China is already actively pursuing. India is also seeking cooperation with Afghanistan on hydropower projects. For India, now is the time to benefit from the strong working relationship it has established with the Taliban, while a regional war or its possible spillover effects, such as a humanitarian or refugee crisis, could hamper India’s nascent but growing footprint in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.