Home Blog Page 797

Tariff rebate check update: Trump and Supreme Court issue big warning on $2,000 payments; ‘There’s a feeling’

0

President Donald Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant appeared to have ruled on $2,000 tax rebate checks following the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling on “Emancipation Day” tariffs. Americans “won’t see it,” the official said in an interview, referring to the tax rebates.

Donald Trump during a news conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Bloomberg)
Donald Trump during a news conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Bloomberg)

“I have a feeling the American people are not going to see it,” Bessant said.

$2,000 tariff rebate

The basic idea behind the payment was proposed by President Trump in January. “The tariff money is pretty substantial,” he told the New York Times in an exclusive interview. “The money is coming and I’m going to make $2,000 at some point. I would say at the end of the year.”

However, neither the White House nor Congress have revealed specific details. The concept was always far-fetched.

Questions about the rebate checks emerged after the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Trump exceeded his authority by imposing global tariffs without congressional authorization.

Will Americans get $2,000 checks from tariffs?

Trump has said the checks will be sent out in 2026. The payments would be made to “moderate-income individuals,” he added. However, Congress did not vote to pass the bill and formally announce the tax rebate.

“The president is talking about a $2,000 tax rebate that would be available to families making less than $100,000 a year,” Bessant said on Fox News at the time. He added that payment was still under discussion.

Based on Friday’s ruling, it seems unlikely that Americans will see the checks.

“If there were compensation, it would be the ultimate corporate benefit,” Bessant told Fox News on Friday, hours after the high court ruling. He added that the amount of revenue affected by the Supreme Court ruling would be closer to $130 billion, rather than the estimated $175 billion.

Trump vs Scotus

Meanwhile, Trump lashed out at the six Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn his tariffs.

“The Supreme Court’s ruling on tariffs is deeply disappointing, and I’m ashamed, absolutely ashamed, of some members of the court who don’t have the courage to do the right thing for the country,” Trump said in the White House briefing room.

The president added that he plans to impose a flat 10% tariff on foreign goods in the coming days.

SC deploys judicial officers in Bangladesh for SIR hearing India News

0

SC deploys judicial officials in Bangladesh for SIR hearing

New Delhi: In an unprecedented decision, Supreme Court on Friday used its “extraordinary powers” to deploy judicial officers in West Bengal to decide on requests for inclusion in the electoral rolls and speed up the completion of a special intensive revision of the electoral rolls. The court stressed that CM Mamata Banerjee should be aware of the consequences if the revision work is not completed. The court explained that “extraordinary circumstances” arose in Bangladesh due to a lack of trust and non-cooperation between the EC and the government of Bangladesh, which necessitated unprecedented judicial intervention under Article 142 of the Constitution. Despite objections from the TMC-led government, a bench of Justices CJI Surya Kant, Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi also allowed the Election Commission (EC) to publish the revised electoral roll (95 per cent of the total list) on February 28, the deadline for publication of the final electoral list, while the remaining inclusion requirements are still being decided. The judge also disagreed with the state government’s argument that the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) and not the judicial officer should have the final say in deciding whether to be included in the electoral roll.TMC: SC orders SIR to hold vote of no confidence in ECThe Trinamool Congress on Friday described the Supreme Court order to hear SIR cases on logical discrepancies by replacing judicial officers instead of those appointed by the EC as a “vote of no confidence in the EC”. The party said in X’s post: “This is a serious indictment of a constitutional institution that has failed to faithfully perform its duties. It is also a powerful testament to our principled fight to defend people’s rights and preserve the integrity of the democratic process.” “Even the country’s Supreme Court seems to believe that the poll body is not neutral and incompetent after issuing unreasonable notices for hearings to people,” TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said.

Donald Trump’s swollen ankle sparks new health concerns after appearing on Josh Pate’s podcast

0

Donald Trump's swollen ankle sparks new health concerns after appearing on Josh Pate's podcast

President Donald Trump’s long-discussed issue of swollen ankles is once again in the public spotlight after a photo taken during a taping of The Unofficial podcast in Georgia surfaced online.This photo shared by sports podcaster Josh Pate shows Trump sitting at The Varsity fast-food restaurant in Rome, Georgia, before a political rally. In the photo, Trump’s calf was visibly swollen above his shoe, sparking new speculation about his health.Pate posted the photo on social media, noting that Trump would appear on his show. The president stopped at a restaurant for a cheeseburger and briefly recorded a podcast before continuing on the campaign trail, according to local reports.

White House cites medical condition

The White House has maintained that Trump’s ankle swelling is caused by chronic venous insufficiency, a condition common in older adults in which veins have difficulty circulating blood efficiently back to the heart.Trump previously admitted in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that he used compression stockings to manage his condition but stopped wearing them because he “didn’t like them.” His aides also told the publication that increased exercise and walking could help improve swelling.In response to the latest photos, a White House spokesman defended Trump’s health and said The Daily Beast, “President Trump is the most perceptive, approachable and dynamic president in modern American history,” he said while dismissing criticism surrounding his condition.However, questions surrounding Trump’s health remain after recent public appearances. The 79-year-old president was caught on camera appearing to doze briefly while seated during his first meeting of the Peace Council on Thursday, the latest in a series of instances where he has appeared tired at official events.

Similar incidents in recent months

In the latest episode, Trump repeatedly noticed swelling in his ankle during public appearances. Photos taken last week of a meeting with Colombian President Gustavo Petro in the Oval Office also drew attention to the issue.In October last year, Trump suffered significant swelling in his ankle while meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Similar observations emerged a month ago when Trump and first lady Melania Trump returned from an overseas trip.Trump, the oldest person currently serving as U.S. president, has also been photographed looking exhausted at some recent official meetings, further fueling debate about his health and stamina.

Whoopi Goldberg’s Epstein ties: What Epstein documents reveal about The View host; ‘Search for private owners’

0

whoopi goldberg is mention The co-host of The View also addressed the issue during the Epstein dossier. goldbergHis name appears in the latest batch of documents released by the Justice Department related to a convicted child sex offender. Jeffrey Epstein.

Whoopi Goldberg was named in Epstein's dossier. (Reuters)
Whoopi Goldberg was named in Epstein’s dossier. (Reuters)

“In the name of transparency, my name is in the document. Yes!” Goldberg said on her show. Her co-host Joy Behar then said: “So in other words, anyone can be on this list?”

To which Goldberg responded: “That’s my point because when I tell you, people try to turn me into… I’m not his girlfriend, I’m not his friend. Not only am I too old [for him]but that wasn’t the case in those days—you used to have to know the facts before you spoke. ”

ALSO READ | Susan Hamblin: 5 things to know about Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s ‘naughty’ emails to Jeffrey Epstein

“People actually believe I’m with him. It’s like honey, come on. Every man I’ve ever been with, you know, because either the National Enquirer has written about it or people have written about it. So, no,” she added.

How Goldberg is mentioned in the Epstein dossier

While Goldberg did read out relevant documents that mentioned her name, people have been curious about her relationship with Epstein.

“Whoopi Goldberg specifically asked plane owner Jeffrey Epstein to accompany her to holiday fundraisers and receive fuel reimbursements,” a person familiar with the matter said claim Another called Goldberg Epstein his “girlfriend.”

Another claimed “The View is trying to cover up why their names are in the Epstein dossier. ‘We didn’t do anything wrong, we were just partying’. Embarrassing! You people got caught!”.

However, Grok fact-checked people explain “Yes, The View’s Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar were mentioned in the recently released Epstein documents. They spoke about it on the show, explained innocent reasons such as charity flights to investigate or attending events where Epstein may have been, and denied any wrongdoing or close ties.”

According to documents released by the Justice Department, there is a 2013 email communication with Epstein. “Whoopi Goldberg needs a plane to fly to Monaco. John Lennon’s charity is paying for it. They don’t want to charter the plane so are looking for a private owner,” communicate read.

“I’m sure the aircraft owner will be able to attend the festivities and receive fuel reimbursement (otherwise, if there are expenses to pay, we’d love to know what expenses are considered for John. Obviously, the more money we keep, the more money will go directly to charity),” the communication added, detailing the travel dates.

The answer to that is “no”.

It’s worth noting that mere mention in Epstein’s documents does not imply wrongdoing, and a number of prominent names emerged during the discussion. For example, Goldberg is mentioned in other documents, including her list As a professional reference.

Other documents include mentions of Goldberg’s name in Disney’s Broadway shows and another instance of her serving as a host.

SC acquits stepfather of 6-year-old in murder, following decades-old ruling | India News

0

SC acquits stepfather of 6-year-old in murder, following decades-old ruling

New Delhi: A six-year-old girl went missing in 2018. She was last seen with her stepfather. He was arrested eight days later, leading police to where her charred remains were found. The Supreme Court found this evidence insufficient and acquitted him of murder. According to neighbors, no other evidence was found linking the man to the murder except that he was the last person seen with the child and that he was the one who led police to the victim’s bones. Judges Sanjay Kumar and K Vinod Chandran acquitted him, saying the investigation was botched and left many questions unanswered. “In this case, a six-year-old girl was murdered with impunity and her stepfather was jailed based on mere speculation,” the SC said. What tipped the scales in favor of stepfather Rohit Chand in the Chhattisgarh case was the peculiarity of the Supreme Court’s interpretation in an earlier judgment of the admissibility of the accused’s statement leading to the discovery of facts relevant to the crime – in this case, the recovery of the girl’s body. More than 65 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that a defendant’s statements leading to the discovery of facts relevant to a crime were admissible as evidence only while in custody. Justices Kumar and Chandran also relied on a similar interpretation used in a Calcutta High Court ruling nearly 100 years ago. Interestingly, in the 1931 judgment, the then Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court expressed anguish over the legal permissibility of relying on statements made to the police (the fact of which can only be discovered when the person is in police custody) and termed it absurd, but left it to the legislature to make appropriate amendments. Based on these decades-old judgments, the SC concluded that the evidence against Jiang Duc was weak. Judge Chandran said even if the evidence was admitted, it would not by itself find the stepfather guilty. “The defendant’s knowledge, which led to the discovery of bone remains, although inadmissible under section 27, was nevertheless admissible evidence under section 8, which is itself weak evidence. The evidence provided for in Article 8 can only provide corroboration and cannot by itself lead to a conviction. “ The judge acquitted the accused, saying: “Although the family and the police had been informed that she had gone with the accused, no complaint was made about the missing child and the fact that the accused was not questioned tipped the scales in favor of the accused… It is also relevant that there is no specific time of death as the incriminating body has not yet been found. Therefore, we cannot uphold the conviction of the accused and a presumption of guilt must be drawn against him.”

‘It’s time to pay the price’: Newsom praises Supreme Court tariff ruling, asks Trump to refund Americans’ money

0

'It's time to pay the price': Newsom praises Supreme Court tariff ruling, asks Trump to refund Americans' money

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision struck down sweeping global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding the president exceeded his legal authority by bypassing Congress, a major setback for President Donald Trump’s trade policies.The court ruled in the majority opinion that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president the power to unilaterally impose broad import tariffs, emphasizing that the Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to impose taxes, including tariffs.In response to the ruling, California Governor Gavin Newsom called for immediate refunds to American families and businesses of what he said were illegally imposed tariffs.“It’s time to pay a price. These tariffs are nothing more than an illegal cash grab that drives up prices and hurts working families. Every dollar illegally taken must be returned immediately, with interest,” Newsom wrote on X.

California’s role in challenging Trump tariffs

California has played a central role in the legal battle, becoming the first state to challenge the tariffs in court in April 2025. The state argued that Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs without congressional approval was illegal and would cause economic harm.State officials warned that the measures would disproportionately impact California’s large agricultural sector, exporters and small businesses, given that it has the largest state economy in the United States.Tariffs could collect more than $130 billion to $142 billion in 2025 alone, according to estimates from the Yale University Budget Lab and federal customs data. Analysts said the costs were passed on to consumers mainly through higher prices, with the average annual loss for U.S. households estimated at $1,751.The Supreme Court ruling marks a major victory for countries, businesses and trade groups that have challenged the tariffs, which they argue disrupt global trade relations and impose heavy fiscal burdens domestically.However, Trump criticized the ruling, calling it “very disappointing” and claiming his administration had “very strong alternatives” to continue protecting U.S. trade interests. He also said he planned to pursue other legal avenues to maintain tariffs under different statutory bodies.

‘That could have been me’: Gordon Ramsay breaks down over brother’s heroin addiction in new Netflix series |

0

'That could have been me': Gordon Ramsay breaks down over brother's heroin addiction in new Netflix series
Gordon Ramsay breaks down over brother’s heroin use in new Netflix series

Being Gordon Ramsay, released on February 18, is a six-part series that offers an unusual, unfiltered look at one of Britain’s most famous chefs. The suspenseful drama, produced by Netflix, follows the 59-year-old as he embarks on what he calls his most ambitious career project to date: opening five separate food and beverage concepts at 22 Bishopsgate, London’s second-tallest building. But beyond the pressure of opening multiple restaurants in one of the capital’s most famous skyscrapers, the documentary also turns inward. Ramsey opens up about his upbringing, his family and the long-lasting shadow left by his brother’s decades-long heroin addiction. “I’m not embarrassed by my past. I was dealt a dysfunctional card. It’s a huge deal,” he said on camera. At another moment, he reflects on how close he felt to a radically different life: he said he “came so close to not achieving it,” and that proximity, he explained, “is what keeps me going.” The series makes no attempt to soften those edges. ramsay Tell Bible says he was “too honest” to “clean up” any part of the project. “We took the Band-Aid off,” he said. “I needed to do something raw. I needed to be less shiny and more real. I guess that’s who I am.”

‘That could have been me’: Family, addiction and a lifetime of guilt

The show’s second episode focuses on Ramsay’s younger brother Ronnie, 58, who has struggled with heroin addiction for much of his adult life. The pair grew up sharing a bedroom, often a bunk bed, as their families moved frequently between impoverished council estates. “I had a brother who was a heroin addict. We shared a bunk bed. He was 15 months younger than me and he had been a heroin addict for the past 40 years. I had been to hell and back with him, so I had a sense of guilt,” Ramsay said in the documentary. “That could be me, or it could be changed.”

Ronnie Ramsey

Ronnie battled heroin addiction for more than four decades, including an arrest in Bali and public legal issues / Picture: Dailymail via X

He elaborated on how close they were in their early lives, and how clearly divided they were: “So, when that… when that change comes so close to you… that’s your brother, right? That’s not a cousin.” This is not friends at the bar. This is your brother. Born in the same house, raised in the same bedroom, sharing bunk beds, so similar… but how could it be so different now? that’s what i mean [being so close to not making it is what keeps him going]. Family instability shaped both men. Ramsay described his father as a “violent alcoholic” and spoke openly about what he called a “fiery relationship” with him. “It’s hard when someone’s an alcoholic, isn’t it? It’s hard to understand that because you just… you’re nervous,” he said in part one. “You know, you worry about hitting the bottom of the bottle and seeing that bottle of Bacardi disappear because you know what’s going to happen in the end.

Gordon

As a child, Gordon moved between 15 council estates, coping with a turbulent family and alcoholism / Netflix

The Ramsay children Gordon and Ronnie and sisters Yvonne and Diane moved frequently. At the age of nine, Gordon moved from the tough Renfrewshire Council estate to Stratford-upon-Avon. This will be the first of many initiatives. talking about big fish In a 2023 podcast, he recalled: “Growing up in a lot of different places, you bond very early. I just want to better myself and get out of an unfortunate situation. I grew up on 15 council estates. “ “There’s always a nerve-wracking moment when you go to another school, another football club. Sometimes you have to make friends again twice in a year. It’s incredibly disruptive.” Ronnie’s struggles were made public in 2007 when he was jailed in Bali for drug offences. Ramsay’s own path diverged dramatically. His restaurant and TV ventures are now estimated to be worth around £180m and he credits tireless work and the resilience of his mother for pushing him forward. “When I became successful, my first wish was to give my mother her own house, her own garage and a car,” he said. “It’s a big deal for a son to take care of his mom. She went to hell and came back to take care of us.” Still, the contrast with his brother remains paramount. “The flip side of my success was that my brother was addicted to heroin. That’s weird, isn’t it?” he said. “You grew up on several council estates, sharing a tiny bedroom and sleeping in bunk beds. You were as close as brothers and we were 14 months apart so everything changed dramatically.”

Being Gordon Ramsay | Official Trailer | Netflix

“I remind myself every day how different things would have been if I had followed a different path and felt that the country owed me something instead of fighting for something.”

IRS refund details: Will you pay $1,390 this month? it’s a fact

0

Rumors are circulating online about a $1,390 payment from the IRS. Social media posts and unofficial websites claim Americans may be eligible for new federal stimulus checks or special rebates. However, there are no official plans to approve such payments.

U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (AFP/Getty Images)
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (AFP/Getty Images)

according to IRS), Congress has not approved any new nationwide $1,390 stimulus package for 2026. The confusion appears to come from misunderstandings about regular tax rebates, refundable tax credits or old relief programs.

What has been officially confirmed?

The IRS makes it clear:

  • No new $1,390 federal stimulus payments
  • Refund The amount depends on each person’s tax return
  • The payments currently being issued are regular refunds or credits, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) or the Child Tax Credit (CTC)
  • Any new stimulus package would need congressional approval

Taxpayers should rely only on official information from IRS.gov.

Also read: IRS Tax Filing and Refund Deadlines 2026 – Key February and March Dates to Know

Steps to Verify IRS Payment Information

  • Go directly to the official IRS website, IRS.gov, rather than clicking on links shared via social media posts, text messages, or unknown websites.
  • Check the current status of your tax refund safely and securely using the official “Where’s My Refund?” tracking tool available at IRS.gov.
  • Log in and regularly check your official IRS online account to view payment history, notices and other tax-related information associated with your profile.
  • Carefully read and review official announcements, updates, and press releases posted on the IRS website for accurate and up-to-date information.
  • Any payment details will only be confirmed by official letters and notifications from the IRS sent via postal mail to your registered address.

Who is receiving legitimate IRS payments?

Some people are receiving legitimate IRS payments, but those payments are tied to the regular tax process. They may include Refund Claims for overpaid federal income taxes, refundable credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), adjustments to an amended tax return, or recovery rebate credits for missed stimulus checks from previous years.

In some cases, payments may also be related to corrections involving identity theft. Eligibility for any payment is based on an individual’s income, tax filing status and number of dependents. There is no automatic or official category called “$1,390 payment.”

Omar defies party and opponents to support Ramadan charity control order India News

0

Omar defies parties and rivals to support Ramadan charity control order
Johnson & Johnson Chief Minister Omar Abdullah (file photo)

Srinagar/Jammu: J&K CM Omar Abdullah He on Friday defended an order by Jammu’s Kishtwar local authority to regulate the collection of zakat during Ramadan, a move that drew widespread criticism, including from some of his cabinet colleagues and ally Congress.Addressing the Assembly, Umar urged lawmakers “not to politicize all issues” and clarified that the February 18 order was issued by the Deputy Commissioner (DC) of Kishtwar after consulting religious leaders as a security measure to check donation fraud. “We should not mix religion with politics. There are issues that require dialogue and understanding at the local level, not political confrontation,” Omar said.The DC order said it aimed to check “unregulated and unauthorized individual donations” during Ramadan. It warned against collection of donations by “unregistered” individuals or institutions without permission from the Wakf Board or Divisional Magistrate.Omar referred to Thursday’s House debate, when MPs Nizamuddin Bhat and GA Mir raised the issue and condemned the order as an interference in religious matters. “I looked into the matter and found out that the DC government did not issue the order itself,” Omar said.Omar said that at a meeting with religious leaders in Kishtwar before Ramadan, many expressed concerns about the misuse of charitable donations. “They told the district council that genuine charitable organizations were suffering losses because donors were misled by fraudulent groups. The district council issued the order on the advice of these religious leaders,” Umar said, adding that the move was welcomed by Jamia Masjid Imam Kishtwar and other clerics in the area.Many were not convinced. Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary condemned the order, saying such decisions should not be taken at the district level when an elected government is in place. Tanvir Sadiq, spokesman for Omar’s ruling National Conference (NC), also debunked the “localization directive”. “I think it’s an interference in religious matters,” Sadiq said.be opposed to plasma display panel Joining the chorus of condemnation, party MLA Waheed Parra argued that charity is not a security issue and urged a reconsideration of the directive. CPI(M) state secretary MY Tarigami said the order actually “cast suspicion on the entire Muslim community”.The BJP was the only party to welcome the order. Opposition leader in J&K Sunil Sharma alleged that some people collected zakat during Ramadan and used the funds for “anti-national activities”. He called for such measures to be adopted elsewhere to prevent the misuse of philanthropy for subversive purposes.

‘Why Dallas looks like New Delhi’: Texas Sen. John Cornyn slammed for now-deleted ‘Welcome to the Indian Century’ post

0

'Why Dallas looks like New Delhi': Texas Sen. John Cornyn slammed for now-deleted 'Welcome to the Indian Century' post

Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn shared a New York Times podcast in which Indian-origin scholar Amitav Acharya said the superpower waiting is India, not the United States or China. Cornyn published an opinion piece in the New York Times titled “Welcome to the Indian Century,” but he was called a traitor for the article and the United States renewed calls not to vote for him. The post was later deleted.“Welcome to the Indian century. People wonder why Dallas looks like New Delhi. You can’t call yourself a patriot and vote for Cornyn. If you are a Texan, send him out on March 3rd,” one of them wrote. “I can’t imagine any other country’s politicians promoting another country. Your policies have contributed to America’s decline. You should be ashamed of yourself,” wrote another. “Konin did a great job representing Ukraine, China and India,” a third user wrote.Acharya spoke in the podcast about the changing world order and how India is becoming a force to be wary of. Regarding the issue of H-1B and the “racial mafia”, Acharya said that it is true that a large number of Indians come to the United States through the H-1B visa program, but they are all qualified. “I can tell you that Indian expatriates on H-1 B visas are not taking any jobs away from President Trump’s support base. I think these are completely different skill levels,” Acharya said. This was also seen as an arrogant comment, as MAGA interpreted it as a statement of the supremacy of H-1B visa holders over Americans. The spat comes as a strong anti-India movement rages on in Texas, with Gov. Greg Abbott freezing H-1B hiring at state agencies and universities and Attorney General Ken Paxton announcing investigations into three H-1B companies. Local city council meetings were often debated over the issue of “Indian takeover.” The last two city council meetings in Frisco have seen large protests targeting Indians.