TOI reporter in Washington: After days of escalating attacks and threats, the United States and Iran suddenly entered into a fragile two-week cease-fire, pulling the world back from the precipice of a doomsday attack and providing a narrow window for diplomacy to achieve peace in the Middle East amid lingering distrust and suspicion. The President of the United States declares an armistice Donald Trump Just two hours away from his 8:00 pm deadline to “annihilate Iranian civilization,” it marks a welcome (albeit chaotic) de-escalation in a month-long conflict that has sent global oil prices soaring 60% and an increasingly impatient world economy. Still, questions remain about whether the ceasefire, which was combined with public signals and back-channel contacts, was a true turning point or merely an episode in a volatile confrontation.The outlines of a ceasefire are limited but significant, official statements and diplomatic sources have learned. Trump initially rejected the ten-point proposal drafted by Tehran as insufficient but now says it provides a “workable basis” for talks in Islamabad on Friday. Under the proposal, both sides would cease direct military strikes and restrain allied or proxy forces within 14 days. Maritime activities in and around the Strait of Hormuz are expected to continue to be subject to heightened monitoring, with informal assurances not to interfere with commercial shipping. However, no formal written agreement has been publicly released, and key details including enforcement mechanisms and verification remain opaque.The breakthrough came not from the United Nations or traditional European intermediaries, but through intense secret negotiations in Pakistan, where Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Army Chief Asim Munir reportedly approached U.S. Vice President Vance and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to hammer out a tentative truce.“Based on my conversations with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Marshal Asim Munir of Pakistan, who have asked me to postpone the deployment of destructive forces to Iran tonight and to agree to a two-week moratorium on bombings and attacks on Iran subject to the Islamic Republic agreeing to the full, immediate and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz. This will be a bilateral ceasefire!” Trump said in a social media post, positioning himself as the benevolent victor. Although Trump claimed that he agreed to the ceasefire because “we have met and exceeded all military objectives and have made great progress toward a final agreement for long-term peace with Iran and peace in the Middle East,” Trump acknowledged receiving Iran’s 10-point proposal, which he said “is a viable basis for negotiations.” “Almost all past contentious points have been agreed between the United States and Iran, but two weeks will allow the agreement to be finalized and refined,” he wrote. But Iran refuted that claim in a statement issued by Tasnim News Agency, the semi-official voice of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, and Trump disputed the veracity of the statement. The statement congratulated the Iranian people for “forcing the criminal United States to accept its ten-point plan,” and said the truce was conditional and reversible, while warning that any violation would be met with a “decisive response.”” Trump dismissed the statement, calling it a “fraud” and “fake news from CNN,” while pointing to a statement by Iran’s foreign minister. Part of the confusion appears to be due to overlapping and potentially divergent signals from within Iran’s leadership. A statement from its foreign ministry struck a more conciliatory tone, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and hinting at preparations for structured talks. That has fueled speculation about a possible rift between Iran’s diplomatic establishment and the hardline clergy and security apparatus that ultimately holds power. Diplomatic focus on the ceasefire now shifts to Islamabad, with talks scheduled to take place on Friday. However, Pakistan’s role is not without controversy. Some commentators believe Sharif and Munir effectively acted as Trump’s “wingmen,” helping to broker a pause that allowed the U.S. president to step back from previous threats without appearing to be retreating under pressure. Critics point to the president’s previous warnings about the use of overwhelming force — including talk of destroying Iranian civilization — as evidence of an overreach that necessitated a diplomatic withdrawal. In this reading, the ceasefire is a face-saving mechanism rather than a negotiated equilibrium. The day’s developments were exacerbated by social media posts showing an edit history of Sharif’s statement, suggesting he was publishing information dictated to him.Trump’s attorneys reject that characterization, insisting the pause reflects strength and strategic discipline, not concessions. However, this perception remains controversial, especially given the growing number of comments in political and media circles surrounding the so-called “TACO” label “Trump is always cowardly.” While such jibes were not part of formal policy discourse, they underscored the domestic dimension of narrative struggles surrounding the ceasefire.
polling
Do you think the recent ceasefire between the United States and Iran will lead to lasting peace in the Middle East?
Israel’s position adds another layer of complexity. Israeli officials have not publicly opposed the ceasefire, but have not explicitly supported it, while expressing caution in accepting it without limiting their ability to respond to threats. At the heart of the upcoming talks in Pakistan are several unresolved issues that will determine whether the ceasefire can evolve into a more durable one. These include the scope of sanctions relief, the future of Iran’s nuclear program, the role of regional proxies and the security of maritime traffic. Diplomats will be watching for signs of consistency in Iran’s negotiating position, particularly whether the Foreign Ministry’s tone is consistent with the broader leadership.
