Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
THE_LOCAL_REPORT_ARTICLES_LOGO THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES

Trusted Indian news delivering fast, factual, and in-depth coverage of politics, business, society, and stories that truly matter

THE_LOCAL_REPORT_ARTICLES_LOGO THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES

Trusted Indian news delivering fast, factual, and in-depth coverage of politics, business, society, and stories that truly matter

  • TRENDING
  • INDIA
  • SPORTS
  • TECH
  • UK
  • WORLD
  • TRENDING
  • INDIA
  • SPORTS
  • TECH
  • UK
  • WORLD
Subscribe
Close

Search

SC: For requisitioned vehicles, the government pays for third-party losses
INDIA

SC: For requisitioned vehicles, the government pays for third-party losses

By WEB DESK TEAM
March 27, 2026 2 Min Read
Comments Off on SC: For requisitioned vehicles, the government pays for third-party losses

New Delhi: Supreme Court He said that if a private car requisitioned by the regional government was involved in an accident, the liability would be borne by the government rather than the insurance company.A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and NK Singh said: “If a vehicle is requisitioned for public function and an accident occurs during the requisition, the liability shall lie with the requisitioning agency and not with the insurance company engaged by the owner for regular and voluntary use of the vehicle.”A bus owned by Kidzee Corner School in Gwalior city was requisitioned by the district administration for the gram panchayat elections. During this period, in January 2010, a motorcycle hit and killed a motorcyclist. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs 5.10 lakh with interest at 6%. The SC increased the compensation to Rs 27 lakh in 2024.A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and NK Singh dismissed the district administration’s plea that assigning responsibility to the civil authorities would send the wrong signal, saying when the government requisitions a private car, the owner is deprived of custody.Judge Carroll said in writing the judgment, “During this period, the owner neither directed its use nor derived any benefits from it. It stands to reason that in this case, if an unfortunate event occurs, the liability should be borne by the purchasing agency, not by the insurance company hired by the owner.”The SC said, “The mandatory deployment of public functions cannot reasonably be described as ‘routine use’…Putting the blame on the insurance company…would result in the contract exceeding the risks agreed to cover.”

Tags:

accident compensationbreaking newsCar Accident Claims TribunalGoogle NewsIndiaIndia news todayindian newsSupreme Courtthird party damagesToday's newsVehicle application
Author

WEB DESK TEAM

Our team of more than 15 experienced writers brings diverse perspectives, deep research, and on-the-ground insights to deliver accurate, timely, and engaging stories. From breaking news to in-depth analysis, they are committed to credibility, clarity, and responsible journalism across every category we cover.

Follow Me
Other Articles
Cricket in L1
Previous

Bastrop Home Depot shooting: 5 things to know about suspect Coby Lee Moser and parking lot incident

Cricket in L1
Next

She hired workers to repair the roof, then allegedly reported the workers to ICE

Copyright 2026 — THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme