Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison sparred during a Senate hearing Thursday morning over the federal investigation into fraud in the state.Hawley accused Ellison of participating in a fraud scheme that resulted in the theft of federal funds allocated to social services programs in Minnesota. Federal prosecutors estimate millions of dollars were stolen from the scheme, The Hills reports.“You have been at the center of this program from the beginning, you have enabled it, and you should resign,” Hawley said during his turn at a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing.Ellison retorted: “You should resign. I feel the same way about you.”Hawley raised his voice, leveling a series of accusations against Ellison and suggesting the attorney general should be “indicted” as Ellison vehemently denied the lawmakers’ accusations.Hawley claims Ellison and his family profited from the scheme. A whistleblower in Minnesota claimed that Ellison and other state officials knew about the fraud scheme as early as 2019, but officials did not intervene.“For the record, he’s lying, that’s the truth,” Ellison said.The interaction was tense from the start, with Ellison refusing to answer Hawley’s opening question confirming his position.“Mr. Ellison, you’re in my courtroom now, you’re under oath, so I suggest you answer my questions,” Hawley said.Committee Chairman Rand Paul (R-Ky.) stepped in multiple times, telling Hawley, “I think we’ve made our point.”Hawley responded: “Oh, I can ask whatever I want, Senator Paul.”At another point in the exchange, Hawley told Ellison, “This is my hearing, friend.” The two exchanged words and Ellison retorted, “Don’t call me a friend.”“I should call you a prisoner because you deserve to be in jail,” Hawley retorted.Ellison has long been a target of Republican attacks. He was one of Minnesota officials subpoenaed by the Justice Department in January over allegations that state officials interfered with federal immigration operations. Since the immigration enforcement operation began, the attorney general has filed several lawsuits challenging the federal government’s actions in the state.Ellison appeared on a panel with other Minnesota officials, including House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), Minnesota House Republican floor leader Harry Niska and Minnesota Department of Corrections Commissioner Paul Schnell.The second panel at the hearing included U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Joseph Edlow, Customs and Border Protection Director Rodney Scott and Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Todd Lyons. Paul asked three immigration officials to appear on panel following the shooting of Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis.Ellison also faces a hearing Thursday morning from Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Ashley Moody, R-Fla.Johnson blamed the attorney general for the deaths of two people killed by federal law enforcement in Minnesota.“Attorney General, you did the exact opposite and two people died because you encouraged them to put themselves in danger,” the senator said.Ellison denied Johnson’s accusations.“It was great theater, but it was all lies,” the attorney general said.
FM Sitharaman: No cuts in funds to states, release now linked to delivery India News
New Delhi: Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman The Center on Thursday said the fund was not a “free pool of cash to be used at will” and asserted that every rupee of taxpayers’ money has been accounted for and funds would not be denied or stopped to any country or any scheme. She dismissed opposition accusations that funding had been cut and said the release of funds was linked to on-the-ground delivery.Reply to discussion about Budget On the RS front, FM said India is on a strong growth trajectory with low unemployment and an expanding middle class. Sitharaman said that through sustained efforts, planning, timely intervention and reforms, India is experiencing a rare phase of high macroeconomic growth and low inflation. She said the budget step shows determination to build a resilient and self-reliant India.Addressing criticism of welfare funds, Sitharaman said, “Earlier, success was measured by how much money was released without ensuring expenditure. This created a huge float. We now have absolute transparency. We do not release funds blindly to account for the expenditure; we release funds only when needed at the grassroots level. Funds will not be denied or stopped to any state or scheme. Every rupee of taxpayers’ money is accounted for.” The center’s funds are not a free pool of cash. They are the hard-earned contribution of every Indian. “Slamming Congress for “crying crocodile tears over rising debt,” she said the opposition wants the government to borrow more and release money to states. “Government cannot overborrow. This principle guides us. Congress is obsessed with spending, but we only fund results. We want results,” she added.Sitharaman denied accusations of high inflation, saying inflation was at historically low levels and there was no inflation crisis. “Inflation has been contained due to stabilization and measures taken by the government. Growth without jobs is the story of the UPA era,” she said.Attacking the TMC-led Bengal government, she alleged that it had failed to implement Centre-sponsored welfare schemes and deprived the people of their benefits. She also refuted the DMK’s claim that there were no major announcements for Tamil Nadu, which is going to polls, outlining the state’s budget proposals.Reacting to former finance minister Chidambaram’s remarks that the Budget was “forgettable”, Sitharaman said, “The Budget will never forget the past. Cherish the glorious past, but learn from the tarnished past and avoid repeating the same mistakes.” These remarks came amid the ongoing political debate in the Parliament.
Nancy Guthrie: New details emerge about suspect’s 25-liter ‘Ozark Trail Hiker’ backpack; FBI increases reward amount
On Thursday, the FIB field office provided new details about the suspect’s backpack, after the agency previously released video from Nancy Guthrie’s door camera. this FBI The backpack was confirmed to be a 25-liter “Ozark Trail Hiker Pack” sold at Walmart.

In addition, as the search for the 84-year-old man failed to make significant progress on its 12th day, the FBI increased the reward for credible information. Nancy Guthrie’s Whereabouts range from $55,000 to $100,000. In the latest details on the suspect, the FBI said the suspect is “a male, approximately 5 feet 9 inches to 5 feet 10 inches tall, with a medium build.”
“We hope the updated description will help focus the tips we receive from the public,” the FBI said. “Since February 1, 2026, the FBI has collected more than 13,000 tips from the public related to this case.” The FBI also shared new images of the backpack.
This story is being updated.
Bangladeshi immigrant sentenced to 20 years in prison under Sheikh Hasina’s regime in Dhaka avoids deportation from UK
A Bangladeshi immigrant has won the right to stay in the UK after a court ruled he cannot be deported as he faces 20 years in prison over explosives charges if he returns.The man, known as “MM” in court, was granted asylum after successfully arguing that Bangladesh’s charges against him were false and politically motivated. He said he was targeted by the previous Awami League government due to his links with opposition political groups, the Daily Mail reported. The interior ministry acknowledged that the bomb charges may have been false but said it was safe for him to return because the political situation in Bangladesh had changed. However, a higher court ruled in his favour.MM told the court that he was the “political leader” of Islami Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami party. He said the Awami League filed false criminal charges against him while he was in Cyprus in 2015.He was convicted in absentia and sentenced to 20 years in prison, according to court documents he provided. These documents have been verified as authentic. Seven other men, including Ahsan Habib, Mostafa Kamal, Mehedi Hasan, Rabiul Islam, Monowar Hossain, Jamirul Islam and Moynul Islam, were also previously convicted and sentenced to the same prison term.High Court Judge Madeleine Ritz said: “[It was] Confirmed [migrant’s] The case relies on the surviving finding that there are actual issued court documents proving that he has been convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison, and that there are two other outstanding warrants for his arrest. The question is, [he] Problems faced on return given having been convicted in absentia and taking into account national information.“They added: “He noted that the Home Office’s handling of the case was difficult to follow given the retained findings that the documents were genuine court-issued documents that were politically motivated and false and not based on any criminal conduct.”Additionally: “The documents were proven to be authentic and the appeal was therefore decided in favor of MM.”The Home Office believes that the resignation of Sheikh Hasina and the Awami League in August 2024 means that MM will no longer be at risk. After months of student-led protests that turned into a nationwide uprising, Hasina resigned and fled to India. A United Nations report said as many as 1,400 people died during the unrest, most of them shot by security forces.Judge Riz said the Awami League had not completely lost power and still had supporters within government offices and law enforcement agencies. She cited reports that the country remains unstable, with some innocent people being arrested and authorities reviewing cases believed to be politically motivated.She concluded: “I therefore conclude that there is a reasonable probability of these particular facts being established. [migrant] Both parties believe they have been detained on politically motivated charges and convictions that are unlawful and do not reflect any wrongdoing. [him]”.It added: “Although these incidents relate to events under the previous regime, the conviction remains, the sentence is lengthy and there is a real risk that he will not be released on bail based on the evidence available.”The court granted his appeal, which means he will stay in the UK.
Stakeholders discuss use of artificial intelligence under NEP 2020 | India News
New Delhi: The two-day Bharat Bodhan Artificial Intelligence Conclave kicked off here on Thursday, bringing together policymakers, academics and industry leaders to discuss ways to deploy AI at scale in India’s education system. The secret meeting came a day after a closed artificial intelligence roundtable chaired by the education minister Dharmendra Pradhan Join the founders of 10 Indian edtech startups.Pradhan said technology must go beyond expanding access to content and focus on improving learning outcomes. He called artificial intelligence a “powerful tool for empowerment and inclusion” and said if deployed responsibly, it would be central to achieving Viksit Bharat’s vision by 2047.A roundtable held at IIT-D on Wednesday brought together policymakers, academics and entrepreneurs to discuss AI use cases related to NE. Startups showcased AI-first solutions spanning K-12 learning, test preparation, language learning, upskilling and career education. Companies include Arivihan, Fermi AI, Seekho, and others. neural network
Who is Nicole Curtis and what does she say? HGTV pulls Rehab Addict for defamation; star apologizes
Nicole Curtis is no longer hosting “Rehab Addict” on HGTV. The show was also removed after a racist slur was caught on camera.

The channel said in a statement, “HGTV recently became aware of offensive racial comments that were made during the filming of ‘Rehab Addict.’ Such language is not only hurtful and disappointing to our viewers, partners and employees, but is inconsistent with HGTV’s values,” according to The Independent. “As a result, we have removed the episode from all HGTV platforms. We remain committed to fostering a culture of respect and inclusion across our content and workplace,” the statement continued.
After the incident, Curtis also issued an apology. The message from her team was: “Regardless of context, she takes full responsibility for the impact. What happened was an apparent slip of the tongue — an incorrect version of a famous expression she said during 17 hours of physical labor and little sleep. Even so, she understands that intention does not undo the impact, and she is truly sorry,” according to Yahoo News.
Of course, there’s a lot of curiosity about what Curtis said that got her into trouble. Here’s the full interaction along with a video clip of the same.
what nicole curtiz said
In the video, Curtis can be seen ladder Trying to fix something. “This is my last one,” she says at the beginning of the video. Then, at work, she said “Oh, fart.”
After realizing what she had said, Curtis can be heard saying “What the f*ck did I just say” as those present laughed. “Nick, you have to… you have to… can you kill that?” she then said, seeking to have the recording cut out. An off-screen voice says it can’t be cut. “Fuck my life,” Curtis can be heard muttering beneath her. breath.
Who is Nicole Curtis?
Curtis is famous for hosting recovering addicts. The show first premiered in October 2010, marking the start of its ninth season on February 11, but has since been removed from the network.
According to her website, Curtis “began researching old homes long before the show arrived.” When the show premiered, she was “busy as a young mother, burning the candle at both ends. Juggling, real estatedesign, home restoration, and selling junk finds on Craigslist,” the website adds.
She has two sons, Ethan and Harper. Curtis and ex-partner Sean Maguire are reportedly locked in a custody battle over son Harper. That was in 2015, and speaking about that time in last year’s People magazine, Curtis said: “Our family has been through a lot over the years, so it was definitely something I tried my best to keep my family out of the public eye and focus on the house. That’s always where we want to focus.”
Muslim groups, Left, TMC oppose government’s move to compel recitation of all 6 verses of Vande Mataram | India News
New Delhi: all india muslim personal law board There was strong opposition on Thursday against the central government’s recent notification requiring recitation of all six verses of ‘Vande Mataram’ before playing the national anthem ‘Jana Gana Mana’ at official events and schools.AIMPLB called the decision “unconstitutional and contrary to religious freedom” and asked the government to withdraw the notification immediately or challenge it in court. Two factions of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, a prominent Muslim group, also raised objections to the government order.Meanwhile, left parties such as the CPI(M) and CPI have also come out against the home ministry’s order. The CPI(M) demanded that the government “uphold the spirit of the Constitution and revoke this order immediately”.The CPI(M) accused the BJP-led union government of trying to “create unnecessary controversy on the issue of national anthem and national anthem with ulterior motives” and that the “BJP government should not be allowed to play with such historical and cultural symbols”.The Left Party emphasized that “Article 51A(a) of the Indian Constitution clearly stipulates that every citizen has the obligation to respect the national flag and the national anthem. After full deliberation, the Constituent Assembly adopted President Rajendra Prasad’s statement on the national anthem. Only two verses of the national anthem can be sung.” “Through the recent order, the government has sought to incorporate the remaining four sections, which the Constituent Assembly considered incompatible with the secular character of the Republic of India,” the party added. Sandosh Kumar P, a member of the Communist Party of India’s Rajya Sabha, accused the government of “cynically weaponizing culture to polarize people”. “Our stance is clear: for us, the country comes first; for the BJP, elections come first,” he added.Talking about the ruling party at the Centre, he claimed that “it is highly ironic that those who played no role in the freedom struggle and remained subservient to British colonialism are now claiming the right to issue certificates of nationalism.”The Trinamool Congress party lashed out at the government, claiming the BJP was “Bengali-Birodi”. “Now, in an official notification, @HMOIndia has distorted the original lyrics of Vande Mataram composed by Rishi Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in Anandamath,” the party claimed in a post on X.Elaborating on the grounds of objection, AIMPLB general secretary Maulana Mohammed Fazlur Rahim Mujaddidi said the home ministry’s order was “unconstitutional, against religious freedom and secular values, contrary to Supreme Court judgments and in direct conflict with the religious beliefs of Muslims”.“Whatever the political considerations behind implementing this decision ahead of the West Bengal elections, it is unacceptable to Muslims as it directly conflicts with their faith,” he added.Maulana Mujadidi said that on the advice of Rabindranath Tagore and the deliberations of the Constituent Assembly, it was unanimously agreed to use only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram. “A secular government cannot impose the beliefs or teachings of one religion on followers of other religions,” he said.He added that the song was written in Bengali background and contains worship and worship of Durga and other deities.AIMPLB Secretary-General emphasized: “Muslims worship only Allah, the one God, and have no partners, and Islam does not allow any form of linking partners to God.”“The committee, therefore, requests the central government to immediately withdraw the notification; failing which, the committee will challenge it in court,” he maintained.Describing the government order as “biased”, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind chairman Maulana Arshad Madani claimed it was a “conspiracy to seize the religious freedom granted to all citizens by the Indian Constitution”.He further claimed that the central government’s order on Vande Mataram was a “unilateral coercive decision” which reflected a “systematic attempt to curtail the constitutional rights of minorities”.“Muslims do not prevent anyone from singing or playing ‘Vande Mataram’; however, some of the lyrics of the song are based on the belief of portraying the motherland as a deity, which contradicts the fundamental beliefs of monotheism. Since Muslims worship only one Allah, forcing him to sing this song is a clear violation of Article 25 of the Constitution and several judgments of the Supreme Court,” he added.In a statement by the Jamiat Ulama-i- Hind faction led by Maulana Mahmood Madani, its general secretary Maulana Hakimuddin Qasmi said: “If the majority group wishes to recite it, they have every right to do so. However, forcing all citizens to do so amounts to imposing restrictions on religious freedom,” he added.He said that the Constitution of India guarantees the inalienable right of every citizen to profess, practice and propagate his or her religion and to live in accordance with his or her own beliefs and conscience. “Therefore, forcing any individual to recite a specific poem or work that conflicts with his or her religious beliefs is contrary to the spirit and letter of the Constitution,” he said.He further said, “India is a pluralistic, multi-religious country, and the supremacy of the Constitution and the principle of ‘unity in diversity’ form the basis of national integration. Any step that weakens this basis is not in the national interest.”“Indian Muslims hold a unanimous and clear stand that any decision that compromises religious freedom will not be accepted. We strongly urge the Indian government to review the above notification in the light of constitutional provisions, judicial precedents and the country’s diverse social fabric so that religious freedom, constitutional dignity and social harmony are safeguarded,” he added.
Republicans slam Purdue University for hiring H-1B workers for $149,000 software engineer position: ‘Aren’t there qualified Americans?’
Indiana Republican lawmaker criticizes Purdue University for hiring foreign software engineers H-1B visaquestioning why taxpayer-funded agencies can’t find qualified Americans to fill the same roles.Andrew Ireland posted on X that Purdue University is hiring “another foreign software engineer on an H-1B visa” with an annual salary of $149,000.“Does anyone believe that not a single qualified American can do this job for $149,000 per year? The same schools have graduated tens of thousands of computer science students,” he wrote. “This has to stop.”Ireland has previously expressed concerns about Purdue’s use of the H-1B visa program. Last month, he criticized Purdue University Northwest for filing an H-1B visa application to hire a foreigner as an assistant professor of marketing at a salary of $127,500.
Taxpayer-funded Purdue University is hiring another foreign software engineer on an H-1B visa.
Does anyone believe that no qualified American can do this job for $149,000 per year? The same school has graduated tens of thousands of computer science students.
This has to stop. pic.twitter.com/eYmoxU00tj
— Andrew Ireland (@AndrewIrelandIN) February 12, 2026
On January 3, he wrote: “Taxpayer-funded Purdue University revealed it is hiring a foreigner on an H-1B visa to teach a marketing class.” He added: “Does anyone really believe that not a single American in the Chicago area can teach marketing for $127,500 per year? The same university even has a PhD program for marketing students”.This marketing position is listed on the Purdue Northwestern University-Hammond campus labor conditions application for the period June 1, 2026 through May 31, 2029.Purdue University has been an active user of the H-1B program. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the university submitted 265 H-1B labor condition petitions in fiscal year 2025, of which 258 were approved.The H-1B visa is designed for U.S. employers to hire highly skilled foreign nationals for specialized positions, including technology and defense. However, some MAGA critics and Republican leaders believe that the United States does not lack domestic talent in fields such as marketing, software engineering, and data science, and offering the same jobs to Indian or Chinese workers from abroad is simply robbery.USCIS data shows that a total of 399,395 H-1B applications were approved nationwide in fiscal year 2024, an increase of 3% from 2023. Educational institutions accounted for 5.6% of this.Many “America First” proponents claim that excessive H-1B approval rates suppress wages and reduce opportunities for American graduates. Meanwhile, politicians including US President Donald Trump and business leaders Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have defended the visa program as a way to attract highly skilled global talent, or the “best of the best”.
SAVE Act: What documentation is needed for a married woman using her spouse’s last name? Rules explained
Securing American Voters Eligibility Act (savings bill) passed in (218-213) United States House of Representatives On Wednesday, it was just one step away from becoming law. As the bill next heads to the Senate, debate has reignited over whether the bill would make it difficult for married women to vote using their husband’s last name.

The biggest change implemented by the SAVE Act is requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. Documents considered proof of citizenship include birth certificates, U.S. passports, and some versions of REAL ID. For naturalized citizens, naturalization documents are required.
The combination of documents required by the SAVE Act creates significant obstacles for married women without passports. Notably, YouGov data shows that more than half of Americans don’t have a passport. The problem affects married women who use their husband’s surname and do not have passports because their birth certificates do not contain the names they currently use.
Those concerns were echoed by some Democratic lawmakers, who said the 69 million married American women who use their spouse’s surname may not be able to register.
In this article we will look at what documents a married woman using her spouse’s surname needs to be registered in the electoral roll.
Documents required for married women
The bill itself does not specify additional documents to clarify the differences between names birth certificate And the current name after marriage. But it has a provision requiring states to accept additional documentation in the form of affidavits to smooth out such discrepancies.
Also read: Trump calls US election ‘rigged’ and pushes for sweeping voting reform: What the US president wants
If such a discrepancy is possible, certified documentation will be required marriage certificate Or a court name change order may be used to support the claim and eliminate the discrepancy. However, marriage certificates and name change certificates themselves are not considered documentary evidence.
But it still brings about two main problems: First, it is usually impossible to obtain a name change certificate when a name change occurs due to marriage. Second, those who have been married for a long time may find it difficult to obtain a marriage license because the marriage license may not be available in state records. In fact, in this case, the concern for older women is much greater.
However, the Trump administration has called this concern a “fallacy.” White House When asked, the press secretary clarified: “Democrats have been fear-mongering about this bill, saying that if married women change their names, they won’t be able to vote. That’s a complete fallacy.”
However, Levitt’s assurances did not completely allay concerns. Additionally, many people complain about the additional cost of obtaining a new marriage certificate and all other related documents that serve as proof of citizenship.
As of Thursday, February 12, a date for a Senate vote on the bill had not yet been set.
Defense Ministry signs deal worth Rs 2,312 crore with HAL to purchase 8 Dornier aircraft for Coast Guard India News
New Delhi: In a bid to boost its ‘Make in India’ initiative, the Indian Ministry of Defense on Thursday signed a contract worth Rs 2,312 crore with defense PSU Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to produce eight Dornier 228 aircraft for Hindustan Aeronautics. indian coast guard.The contract was signed under the ‘Purchase (India) Category’ in the presence of Defense Minister Rajesh Kumar Singh.The contract reinforces the government’s commitment to Atmanibal Bharat while strengthening India’s maritime security architecture.The scheme is expected to create substantial direct and indirect employment opportunities by strengthening HAL’s production ecosystem and supporting a wide network of MSMEs and ancillary industries. This will also create ongoing opportunities in maintenance, repair and overhaul and life cycle technical support, the Ministry of Defense said.As of now, HAL is involved in a wide range of defense projects and manages a huge order book, which involves the production of more than 180 Tejas Mk-1A fighter jets and development of Tejas Mk-II; development and production of Light Combat Helicopter (LCH), Prachand (an additional 156 units ordered), Indian Multi-purpose Helicopter (IMRH), Light Utility Helicopter (LUH) and Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH); production of 70 HTT-40 Basic training aircraft; and obtained production license for Su-30MKI engine and MiG-29 upgraded version.HAL on Thursday reported strong financial results for the 12th quarter of the current financial year, with the defense PSU reporting a 29.6 per cent year-on-year growth in its consolidated net profit. Profit after tax for the quarter was 1,866.7 billion rupees, as compared to 1,439.8 billion rupees in the same period last fiscal year (Q3FY25), according to an exchange filing.
