Home Blog Page 757

Shanghai has been sinking for decades, but something unseen underground is slowing it down | World News

0

Shanghai has been sinking for decades, but something unseen underground is slowing it down
The city of Shanghai is sinking (Image source: Canva)

Scientists have warned for decades that Shanghai, one of the world’s largest and most densely populated coastal megacities, has been slowly sinking due to the way humans use the land beneath it. This problem is not new. According to reports, historical records show that parts of Shanghai have dropped by more than 2 meters over the past century due to over-pumping of groundwater and soft, compressible urban soil. Subsidence makes the city more likely to experience flooding, rising sea levels and damage to infrastructure.But even as it all sinks, Shanghai isn’t suddenly falling apart or disappearing. Engineers and officials have found ways to slow the rate at which the ground is sinking. They have begun taking steps such as reducing groundwater pumping, extracting water into deeper aquifers, and replenishing aquifers with treated surface water rather than allowing the land to dry out as water is pumped. These actions act like invisible supports beneath the city, arresting and slowing subsidence.Parts of Shanghai are still sinking, but the average subsidence rate has dropped significantly since its peak in the mid-20th century. Understanding how and why this happens requires digging deep into the underground, porous sediments and human-managed water systems that together determine the risks and responses in this megacity.

What causes cities like Shanghai to sink?

Shanghai sits on the flat, soft sediments of the Yangtze River Delta. Sedimented over thousands of years, these sediments contain layers of silt, clay and sand that behave like a sponge when loading or unloading water. When these tiny pore spaces fill with water, they help support the weight of the buildings, roads and soil above them. However, when too much fluid is withdrawn, the supporting pore pressure decreases and the sediment compacts under its own weight. This process causes land subsidence, or surface subsidence.In the early and mid-20th century, rapid industrial development and population expansion led to Shanghai pumping out large amounts of groundwater. People extract water for industry, agriculture and growing urban needs. This, combined with the weight of high-rise buildings, resulted in land subsidence rates reaching or exceeding 10-15 centimeters per year in some areas in the late 1950s and early 1960s.The subsidence phenomenon is not unique to Shanghai. Other cities, including Mexico City and Long Beach, California, have experienced similar land subsidence as fluids are pumped from below the surface. In each case, the behavior of fluids in underground sediments plays a central role in whether the ground sinks, rises, or remains stable.

Invisible support: How water injection works

If removing water causes sediment compaction, scientists and engineers ask a simple question: What would happen if we put some liquid back in? Cities began trying to inject water into depleted aquifers and old oil or gas fields, rather than treating the water table as drainage. Injecting water under pressure increases pore fluid pressure in the sediment, providing additional support and reducing compaction rates.In Long Beach, California, a water injection program started in the late 1950s helped reduce land subsidence in the area from as much as 9 meters to much lower levels. Engineers use treated seawater and formation water injected through hundreds of wells to slow the compaction of depleted layers. The scheme is widely cited as one of the first large-scale applications of liquid injection to control subsidence.Shanghai takes a related but slightly different approach. Authorities have gradually reduced over-pumping of groundwater, diverted water to deeper strata, and installed recharge wells to inject treated river water underground. As a result, the once-rapid rate of subsidence has slowed to about one centimeter per year in recent decades. That doesn’t mean cities are rising again, but it does mean the rate of decline has slowed significantly.

Why reducing settlement is important

For a coastal city like Shanghai, even a few centimeters of ground movement can have a big impact. Land subsidence, along with rising sea levels due to climate change, makes flooding more likely, damaging infrastructure such as subways and roads, and raising flood prevention costs. In real life, every centimeter less settlement gives planners and engineers more time to improve drainage, strengthen levees, or rethink how infrastructure is built.But experts caution that fluid injections and artificial replenishment do not cure the disease. Much of the compression that occurs before these practices begin is almost permanent. Scientific studies of subsidence in places like Mexico City show that even if groundwater is allowed to rise, the ground rarely returns to its original height.Risks associated with fluid injection also include the potential to reactivate faults or trigger small seismic events if water is added too quickly or inappropriately. As a result, modern projects rely on detailed monitoring systems, including GPS, satellite radar and borehole instruments, to track minute changes in surface and underground pressures.

The future of Shanghai and other sinking cities

Many low-lying megacities in China and elsewhere face similar challenges. Historical records show that since the early 20th century, central Shanghai has sunk by more than two meters due to the dual effects of groundwater extraction and urban development.Government agencies and researchers are now carefully monitoring ground movements and integrating lessons from other cities to manage subsidence. Techniques such as artificial recharge and careful groundwater management are becoming part of wider urban planning strategies aimed at reducing long-term risks.While Shanghai has not yet completely sunk, its experience and that of other sinking cities shows that invisible processes beneath our feet can shape the fate of entire metropolises. As sea levels continue to rise and cities continue to grow in size, understanding and managing these processes remains a key priority.

No-confidence motion against Om Birla: India group ally TMC refuses to sign notice; wants to discuss first | India News

0

No-confidence motion against Om Birla: India Group ally TMC refuses to sign notice; wants discussion first

New Delhi: Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee On Tuesday said his party had “no problem” signing the no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, but insisted the opposition should first express its displeasure to the Speaker, including suspending eight MPs. Speaking to reporters at the Parliament House, Banerjee said the Speaker should be given a chance to respond before the opposition moves a resolution calling for his removal. Although the opposition parties submitted a notice earlier in the day accusing Birla of “blatantly partisan” behavior, the TMC chose not to sign off on the move, PTI reported.“The All India Trinamool Congress had no problem signing the no-confidence motion against the Speaker. All 28 MPs will sign the agreement,” Banerjee said. “However, before moving the no-confidence motion, we would like all India Group partners to sign a letter to the Speaker highlighting the four points on which the argument is based. ” Citing the suspension of eight MPs, Banerjee said the opposition could appeal for reconsideration and give the Speaker “two to three days” to respond. “If the Speaker fails to act or fails to provide satisfactory answers to these four questions, a motion of no-confidence can be tabled after three days,” he said. Opposition parties, including the Congress, Samajwadi Party and DMK, submitted notices to Lok Sabha general secretary Utpal Kumar Singh through Congress leaders Gaurav Gogoi, K Suresh and Mohamed Jawed. The resolution accuses Bella of acting with “blatant partisanship” and making “blatantly false” accusations against members of Congress. The TMC leader said his party wanted Parliament to function normally and questioned the repeated prorogations of the House. “We want the House to function normally but the federal government does not seem to be doing so,” Banerjee said, adding that it was also the speaker’s responsibility to ensure smooth proceedings.According to sources, around 120 MPs from political parties including Congress, DMK, Samajwadi Party, Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (SP) signed the notification.

The age of artificial intelligence: Are we really getting smarter or dumber? |India News

0

The age of artificial intelligence: Are we really getting smarter or dumber?

Today, artificial intelligence has become a handy tool. It helps us think faster and clearer in chaotic moments and often provides a sense of control in a chaotic digital world. For many people, AI tools such as ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity and others are no longer optional aids but daily companions.There was a time when being stuck meant slowing down. The answers can only be found by looking through books, libraries, interviews/conversations and research. The process can often be frustrating, but it forces people to participate. People must independently conduct research, connect ideas, challenge assumptions, and draw conclusions. Critical thinking is not an optional skill that can be outsourced.Today, a prompt can generate an answer instantly. Tasks that once took hours now take just minutes. There is no denying that quantitative productivity has improved. But speed comes with a trade-off. When answers are readily available, there is less need to solve problems. However, it is in this struggle that critical thinking becomes sharper.

.

So, let’s take a deeper look at how AI can shape critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Application of artificial intelligence in the classroom

When we talk about artificial intelligence, we must start from the period when critical thinking develops – school age. At this point, children not only learn facts, but also how to ask questions, analyze, argue, and draw conclusions.For those from the pre-artificial intelligence era, going to school meant long hours reading textbooks, handwriting notes, calling classmates to do homework, and more recently, browsing the internet. The process can be frustrating at times, but it requires effort and thought.School age looks very different these days. A single prompt on ChatGPT, Meta AI or similar platforms can generate structured answers in seconds. Papers, abstracts, explanations of complex concepts – all are available almost instantly. The efficiency is undeniable. But the core question remains: If AI is thinking, are children still learning how to think?When used correctly, AI can act less like a shortcut and more like a mentor. It can explain difficult questions, simplify dense topics, generate practice questions, or provide feedback on writing structure. For students who are hesitant to ask questions in class, AI can provide a non-judgmental space to clarify doubts. In this sense, it may democratize access to academic support.Although there is a risk of passive consumption. When students copy answers without thinking, they may complete the assignment without grasping the underlying concepts.Tulika, a high school teacher in Georgia, USA, explained this. “When students turn to AI tools when they are struggling rather than independent study, I view it as a neutral tool whose impact depends entirely on student intent and instructor guidance. In my experience, AI does not eliminate critical thinking; rather, it exposes the divide between students who want to learn deeply and those who are content with average results,” she said.She further said that she also sees positives in the use of artificial intelligence as long as people remember to limit it to helping assistants.

.

As an Indian-American teacher in the United States, Tulikaa offers another perspective, coming from a different culture and finding AI helpful in understanding her students and the overall environment. Although she emphasized that “artificial intelligence tools such as MagicSchool, Nearpod, ChatGPT (including teacher-centered GPT), Perplexity, etc. support planning and idea generation, they cannot replace teaching understanding. AI-generated lessons are only effective if the teacher understands the standards, the students, and how to give clear, actionable instructions. Responsible use of AI has broadened my learning horizons, enhanced course design, and helped me direct instruction toward clearer learning goals. “From a teacher’s perspective, 13-year-old Mishika Gupta also shared the negative impacts of AI but wasn’t entirely convinced of its accuracy. Sharing her personal experience, she said: “Unlike most of my classmates, I don’t use AI to do or help me with homework because I feel I can’t trust it yet. I’ve seen it fail to give the correct answers many times. For example, I couldn’t understand my Spanish homework, asked for help, and found that the translation was incorrect.She also sees the impact it has on her peers, adding: “I feel like AI is being misused by a lot of people my age. They use it every day for homework. Most of my classmates are so addicted to ChatGPT that they don’t even try to answer the questions, they just copy whatever it asks without even reading it. I feel like it stifles creativity in kids my age. Some of them actually chatted with it like it was their good friend. They share their feelings with it and ask it to solve their life problems.Her mother, Dr. Shu Qi, also supports her daughter’s idea and hopes that she will maintain this belief. Contrasting her school days with today, she said: “AI tools have become an integral part of today’s young people’s lives. I see them using them not only as a tool to help with homework, but also as friends, mentors and confidants.”“I think the joy of sifting through multiple library books, magazines or research articles to research a topic is something the current generation will never experience. This process also allows us to broaden our worldview, understand a topic from different perspectives, and gain insight into the minds of subject matter experts. All the hard work put into this task ensured that we completed it with pride and a huge sense of satisfaction,” she added.When asked to give advice to her daughter about using artificial intelligence, she emphasized being aware of its limitations.

.

Meanwhile, another parent, Om Prakash Bhatia, has reservations about artificial intelligence, saying it is killing children’s creativity.

.

Therefore, the AI ​​and homework debate is not black and white. Artificial intelligence can expand the scope of explanations, support struggling learners, and help educators improve teaching. At the same time, uncontrolled dependence can undermine efforts, undermine conceptual clarity, and can lead to erroneous conclusions in the absence of validation.Ultimately, the question is not whether AI will invade the classroom; It already has. The real challenge is not just teaching children how to use AI, but how much to use it.

Artificial Intelligence in Content Writing: Efficient or Superficial?

One of the areas where artificial intelligence is widely used is content writing. In newsrooms, PR offices, the publishing industry, the question remains: How can humans compete with machines that can generate content in seconds?Artificial intelligence has undoubtedly accelerated production. It can draft blogs, summarize reports, suggest titles, and even mimic tone of voice. But writing is more than just grammatically correct sentences. It touches on lived experience, subtext, cultural differences and emotional connections. While AI can simulate empathy and construct narrative arcs, it doesn’t feel urgency, sadness, irony, or joy; it fakes it.This becomes even bigger as AI moves from short-form content to long-form storytelling. From self-help manuals to novels, books are increasingly being drafted in part or entirely by artificial intelligence. The bigger question, therefore, is not whether AI can write books, but whether readers will value efficiency over originality, simulation over the human voice.Anuranjita Pathak, founder of Natals Publications, raised concerns about this. “I have been in this industry for over 6 years and have met many excellent writers and editors. The delivery time of content/novel has been greatly shortened. I know someone who spent 4 years writing a book – the depth of these 4 years cannot be written by artificial intelligence. So the original thought and critical depth must have declined.”Elaborating on her stance, she added, “Now people are using AI to brainstorm – ‘give me 5 plot twists’, ‘write a table of contents for an HRMS book’.”She shares her frustrations when dealing with AI writings and talks about how non-AI writings can have depth and complexity.

.

Can we trust artificial intelligence?

In reality, the AI ​​still tends to refer to Donald Trump as “former president” and make up its own citations when asked for research, and accuracy is an issue.There are many examples of AI making up its own information or distorting facts. One example from Deloitte even made headlines when a report was discovered to have been produced using artificial intelligence.last year, Deloitte faces controversy Scrutiny is growing over the Australian government’s use of generative artificial intelligence in preparing the document after errors were discovered in a report, including falsified references and incorrect court citations. After the incident came to light, Deloitte agreed to provide a partial refund to the Australian federal government and released a revised version of the report that corrected the inaccuracies.Therefore, it becomes important to reiterate that AI has the ability to override our logical brains and lull humans into a false state of safety until it is caught or becomes too robotic to connect with humans.

The story of artificial intelligence

Since we’re talking about artificial intelligence, it’s also important to hear what the robots have to say.So let’s see if ChatGPT, perplexity, Grok and Meta AI believe “Is AI making us dumber and killing our critical thinking?

  • ChatGPT: Commonly used bots also highlight an important aspect of the discussion, which is that AI itself is not important, but how it is used determines whether it will have an impact human mind. “It’s a tool – it can be a brain booster or a crutch,” it says.
Chat GPT

  • Grok: Grok is adamant that “AI is not inherently ‘making us dumber’ or ‘killing’ critical thinking in some irreversible, pervasive way.” However, this also draws attention to the way in which core questions are used in decisions. It also cites some research (unsubstantiated; used only for context in this article) to explain its stance.
Gronk

  • Confusion: Confusion also gives a balanced view. Like the others, it lists pros and cons. “AI can weaken critical thinking if we outsource too much of our thinking to it, but if used intentionally it can also enhance critical thinking rather than ‘make us dumber’,” it said, citing various sources (not confirmed and used only in the context of this article)

Puzzled

  • Meta AI: It doesn’t give a clear answer, but it gives different perspectives, pointing out both sides of the argument, while also highlighting the intent and usage that will really determine whether AI makes us dumber. “There may be risks if we let it do all the heavy lifting without using our own minds. But if we use it as a tool to enhance our abilities, challenge our assumptions, and explore new ideas, it can actually make us sharper!” it says.
meta-artificial intelligence

Allies or obstacles; the choice is ours

Looking at the insights from humans and robots, it’s clear that AI will have an impact on the human mind beyond just the use of AI. In fact, it depends on how we choose to use it. By itself, it is a neutral tool.If you rely blindly on it, you risk stifling creativity, problem-solving, and independent thinking.On the other hand, if used responsibly, AI can enhance human intelligence. It can help organize ideas, provide new perspectives, simplify complex concepts, and inspire creative solutions that we may not have considered on our own.

.

The key is balance, treating AI as a helper rather than a substitute for the original idea, a partner rather than a substitute.In fact, we are not smarter or dumber because of AI, but because of how we choose to interact with it. We have the opportunity to think, think, and decide: do we let it think for us, or do we let it help us become smarter? The answers will shape the future of learning and creativity in an AI-driven world.

How do I apply for the 2026 Additional Child Tax Credit? Check if you are eligible for an ACTC refund

0

In light of the tax changes announced by the IRS and the lasting changes included in the so-called One Big, Beautiful Bill, many families across the United States are considering the amount of tax refunds they may receive in 2026 due to additional taxes child tax credit (ACTC). This benefit remains one of the most important forms of assistance available to parents and guardians, and understanding its mechanics can greatly influence the application process.

2026 Additional Child Tax Credit: IRS tax changes have families considering a 2026 tax refund through the Additional Child Tax Credit. The credit can provide substantial financial relief to qualifying parents and has specific requirements for qualifying children, including age and residence. (Pexel)
2026 Additional Child Tax Credit: IRS tax changes have families considering a 2026 tax refund through the Additional Child Tax Credit. The credit can provide substantial financial relief to qualifying parents and has specific requirements for qualifying children, including age and residence. (Pexel)

Also read: How to get an extra $6,000 in “Premium Bonus” this tax season? Who is qualified?

What is the child tax credit? Look at 3 categories

It is designed to provide relief to those with children who meet certain criteria, allowing them to receive significant tax relief. Best of all, even if you don’t normally submit tax returnyou may still be eligible to apply for and benefit from this assistance. There are three categories:

Child Tax Credit (CTC): A non-refundable credit that allows individuals with qualifying children to reduce their tax liability.

Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC): This represents the refundable portion of CTC. The ACTC allows certain eligible taxpayers to receive a refund if they exceed their tax liability.

Other Dependent Credit (ODC): Provides a non-refundable credit to taxpayers with dependents who are not eligible for CTC/ACTC.

Who is eligible for the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC)?

this child tax credit Provide up to $2,200 per qualifying child. If your federal tax liability is minimal or non-existent, you may qualify for the Additional Child Tax Credit, which can be up to $1,700 per qualifying child based on your income. Standards include:

Are under 17 years of age at the end of the tax year.

Not providing more than half of its own financial support during the tax year.

Live with you for more than half of the tax year.

Be claimed as a dependent on your tax return.

Be a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or U.S. resident.

How to get an ACTC refund

If you have applied for the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC), the IRS won’t be able to process those refunds until mid-February. All refunds, including any amounts not related to these points, are subject to this delay. You can find out the exact refund date and more information via “Where’s My Refund?” Mid to late February.

At that time, all qualifying families can claim the credit by providing the names of their children and other dependents on their U.S. individual income tax return, Form 1040, and completing Schedule 8812, Credit for Qualified Children and Other Dependents.

Is Pakistan in great danger? Former Pakistan star assures ‘America will beat Pakistan again’ – Watch | Cricket News

0

Is Pakistan in great danger? Ex-Pakistan star promises 'America will beat Pakistan again' - Watch
Image source: Getty Images

Former Pakistan fast bowler Mohammad Asif has issued a strong warning to the national team ahead of the 2026 T20 World Cup against the United States, scheduled to be played at the Sinhalese Sports Club in Colombo on Tuesday. The match will be the second meeting between the two teams at the World Cup and Asif believes Pakistan could once again find themselves on the wrong side of the result.“The way things are going, the US will beat Pakistan again. It seems possible in the 2026 T20 World Cup as well. The US will beat Pakistan again in the 2026 T20 World Cup. Guaranteed,” Asif said.

Special dinner hosted by Team India at Gautam Gambhir’s home in Delhi | T20 World Cup

The United States announced their arrival on the global stage when they made their World Cup debut in 2024, beating Pakistan in a dramatic match. Chasing a modest goal, the United States needed 15 points in the final round, and Haris Rauf dropped 14 to send the game into the super round.Pakistan then faltered under pressure, with senior pacer Mohammad Amir hitting three in the super over and conceding 18 runs. Pakistan responded with just 13 runs to hand the US a famous victory.Heading into the Battle of Colombo, Team USA will be eager for a comeback after losing their first game to India and will see this game as an opportunity to repeat their heroics against Pakistan.Meanwhile, Pakistan narrowly escaped death in their first match against Netherlands on Saturday. The 2009 champions were on the verge of another upset, needing 29 points in the final two overs before Faheem Ashraf’s late charge turned the game in their favour.With only the top two teams from Group A advancing to the Super Eight stage, Pakistan cannot afford further missteps, especially after opting out of the February 15 match against India. If they lose to the United States like they did in 2024, they could be eliminated in the group stages of the World Cup again.

Explained: How a no-confidence motion against the Speaker of the Lok Sabha works – does oppn have numbers? |India News

0

Explained: How a no-confidence motion against the Speaker of the Lok Sabha works – does oppn have numbers?

New Delhi: Confrontation with BJP-led National Democratic Alliance government escalates congress House Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday moved a notice of no confidence, alleging blatant partisan behavior on several occasions during the ongoing budget session, including refusing to give speech time to opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and suspending lawmakers.The Congress moved a no-confidence motion signed by 118 opposition MPs on the grounds that opposition leader Rahul Gandhi was not allowed to address the House as he failed to take action against the opposition. bjp MP Nishikant Dubey, made unsubstantiated accusations against congresswomen and suspended eight opposition MPs.

Kiren Rijiju slams Congress, shares video of woman MP taking PM Modi’s Lok Sabha seat

“Under Article 94(c) of the Constitution of India, a resolution notification has been issued to remove Om Birla from the post of Speaker of the Lok Sabha for his blatant partisanship in conducting the affairs of the Lok Sabha. On several occasions, opposition leaders were not allowed to speak, which is their fundamental democratic right in Parliament,” the motion tabled in Parliament said.Congress MP Manikam Tagore said in a social media post on X that the opposition took this step under “extraordinary circumstances”.“The opposition believes in the legitimacy of the Constitution. While we respect the Speaker personally, we are pained and anguished that Opposition members are consistently denied the opportunity to raise issues of public importance,” Tagore said.He added: “Years later, a notice of no confidence has been lodged against the Speaker – an extraordinary step born out of extraordinary circumstances.”The motion has the support of 118 parliamentarians, including the Samajwadi Party and DMK. However, TMC, another partner of the Indian Group, has not yet expressed its position.why nowDuring the budget session, Parliament witnessed a major showdown between the opposition and ruling parties. The incident began when Speaker Om Birla stopped Congress leader Rahul Gandhi from quoting an article citing the unpublished memoirs of former Army Chief General MM Naravane. While discussing the motion to thank the President for his speech, the House fell into chaos when Rahul refused to move forward and repeatedly tried to quote excerpts from his memoirs about the 2020 conflict with China in the Galwan Valley.In addition, Bella suspended eight members of Congress for repeatedly disrupting the House of Representatives.On February 4, Birla also advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi not to come to the House of Representatives to deliver his much-anticipated speech after he claimed to have received information that some Congress MPs may rush to the Prime Minister’s seat in the House of Representatives to “act in an unprecedented incident”.

.

However, Rahul Gandhi refuted Birla’s claims and insisted Prime Minister Modi He avoided appearing on the House floor because of the issues he raised.“This issue started a few days ago when Naravane’s book came out. The government did not want me to discuss the issue, thus leaving the House deadlocked,” Rahul said.“The facts are very clear, the Prime Minister was afraid to come to the House, not because of the MPs, but because of what I said. He remains afraid because he cannot face the truth,” he added.Claims and CounterclaimsEarlier on Monday, a group of women MPs from Congress also sent a strongly worded letter to Om Birla, accusing him of making “false and defamatory allegations” against them.“We write this letter with deep pain and a strong sense of constitutional responsibility. It is extremely unfortunate that you, as Speaker of the Lok Sabha, have been forced by the ruling party to make false, baseless and defamatory accusations against female members of parliament who belong to the opposition,” the letter read.

.

Refuting this view, a letter from a BJP woman MP to Birla alleged that the MP had crossed parliamentary boundaries.A BJP lawmaker wrote to Speaker Birla, claiming that opposition women lawmakers “surrounded the prime minister’s seat” and invaded the speaker’s chamber on February 4.They urged the Speaker to take the “strongest possible action” against MPs involved in the incident.Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju also shared a video of the standards showdown that took place in the Lok Sabha on February 4 Rijiju lashed out at the grand old party for “encouraging” its women MPs to block the alley where the Prime Minister could have walked into the House, saying the PPP MPs had shown maturity and restraint which could have led to complete chaos in the House.In the video, two or three ministers, including Ashwini Vaishnaw, Giriraj Singh and other MPs, begged and persuaded the female MPs to return to their seats and not engage in such unparliamentary behavior, but the latter remained merciless and stood firm with banners and posters.What is Section 94(C)Article 94(C) of the Constitution provides for the procedure for moving a motion of no confidence against the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.The Constitution stipulates: “A member who serves as the Speaker or Deputy Speaker of the People’s House may be removed from office by a resolution passed by a majority of all members of the People’s House.”

.

It further states: “No resolution for the purposes of subsection (c) shall be moved unless at least fourteen days’ notice of intention to move the resolution is given.”how it worksAccording to the rules of procedure and conduct of the Lok Sabha, any member of the House of Representatives can demand the removal of the Speaker. Under Chapter 18 of the Rule Book, members must submit written notice along with the full text of the resolution to the Secretary of the House of Representatives.Once the notice is received, the motion seeking approval of the motion resolution will be entered into the list of businesses in the name of the member who submitted the notice. The date for consideration of the motion is fixed by the President (usually the Deputy Speaker), as the Speaker cannot preside over the House while a motion to remove the Speaker is being considered.The Chair then places the motion before the House and asks whether it should be approved for consideration. After the motion is tabled in the House of Representatives, at least 50 members must stand to support it. If this threshold is not reached, the motion fails and the member who proposed the motion is notified accordingly.If the motion is accepted, a vote will take place. Voting may be conducted by oral vote, split vote or other prescribed methods.Will the motion be accepted?Even after obtaining the signatures of 118 opposition MPs, whether the motion can be passed will still depend on the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives.For a resolution to be adopted, certain conditions set out in the rules must be met. The resolution should be specific about the allegations and state them clearly and unequivocally.It must also be expressed clearly and precisely, leaving no room for vague or loosely worded claims. Furthermore, resolutions must not contain arguments, inferences, satirical expressions, accusations or defamatory statements to ensure that they are truthful, restrained and strictly limited to the allegations stated.Does the opposition have numbers?The motion appears to be more symbolic and a political gesture since removing the Speaker of the Lok Sabha requires a valid majority – that is, a majority of the existing seats in the House, excluding vacant seats. Even if the motion is tabled, it appears to be an uphill battle for the opposition as it lacks the necessary seats in the 543-member House of Representatives. In the 18th Lok Sabha, the BJP-led NDA has a majority with 293 seats. In comparison, the Indian group has 238 seats, falling short of the required number. However, if the motion is discussed in the House of Representatives, the opposition parties will have the opportunity to make accusations against Speaker Bella.Has this happened before?Although rare, such motions have historically been used to question the moral authority of the chair rather than to overthrow the chair.This is not the first time the opposition has decided to file a motion of no confidence against the Speaker of Parliament. In early 2024, the opposition filed a similar motion against Jagdeep Dhankhar, then Chairman of the House of Federation and Vice-President.However, Vice-President Harivansh dismissed the motion, calling it inappropriate, seriously flawed and rushed, damaging the reputation of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankar.On December 10, at least 60 opposition members signed a notice calling for the dismissal of Vice President Dhankar.Since independence, history also records at least three instances of no-confidence motions being tabled to remove the Speaker. The first was in 1954 against the first Lok Sabha Speaker GV Mavalankar, when MP Vigneshwar Misra claimed that the Speaker was unfair.In 1966, opposition MPs moved a motion against Speaker Sardar Hukum Singh, led by Madhu Limaye and chaired by Deputy Speaker SV Krishnamoorthy Rao.The third motion was moved on April 15, 1987, by CPM MP Somnath Chatterjee to remove Speaker Balram Jakhar, with Deputy Speaker Thambi Durai presiding. The motion was rejected by the House of Representatives.

How to get an extra $6,000 in “Premium Bonus” this tax season? Who is qualified?

0

The Big Beauty Act allows taxpayer People aged 65 and over can claim an additional $6,000 in deductions without itemizing deductions. This deduction will be implemented for the 2025 tax year (when returns are filed in 2026) and is in addition to the standard additional deduction for seniors and blind individuals. Additionally, it applies to individuals and allows married couples filing jointly to claim up to a total of $12,000. The “extra” deduction for seniors expires at the end of fiscal year 2028.

Starting in 2025, seniors 65 and older can apply for a new $6,000 credit in addition to existing exemptions. (Associated Press)
Starting in 2025, seniors 65 and older can apply for a new $6,000 credit in addition to existing exemptions. (Associated Press)

Also read: February 11 Social Security payments: Here’s who got a payment and who didn’t

Who is eligible for the new tax breaks?

To qualify for the new senior citizen deduction, you must be 65 or older by December 31, 2025 and file as a single taxpayer, head of household, surviving spouse, or as a married couple filing jointly. This deduction is not available to married couples filing separately. However, there is an income threshold. For individual filers, the deduction begins to phase out if your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds $75,000 and is completely eliminated at $175,000.

For married couples filing jointly, the deduction begins to taper off at $150,000 and is eliminated entirely at $250,000.

For solo use taxpayerthe maximum deduction is $6,000, while the maximum deduction for joint filers is $12,000.

Also read: Social Security Alert: Retirees Will Soon Face $460 Monthly Pay Cuts? this is what we know

What is the new senior tax credit?

Additional tax benefits available to seniors do not require itemized deductions and can be claimed directly on Form 1040 or 1040-SR.

Your date of birth is important information to provide on your tax return. Your eligibility will be automatically determined by IRS If you are 65 years of age or older. Your eligibility should be automatically recognized by trusted tax preparation software, which will then apply the deduction on your behalf.

If you file by paper, be sure to include your correct Social Security number and check the age box (65+).

Learn about the senior citizen deduction

The current exemption for seniors and the blind, which is $2,000 for single filers and $1,600 for married couples filing separately, could be supplemented by the new deduction.

For 2026 tax returns, the additional standard deduction will increase to $2,050 for single filers and $1,650 for each qualifying spouse of a married couple filing jointly.

If a person chooses not to itemize deductions, they can still claim the standard deduction, unlike these two deductions.

How does the new advanced deduction work?

For a 72-year-old individual filing with income of $70,000, the standard deduction is $15,750. They qualify for a new $6,000 deduction and the current $2,000 standard deduction for seniors. This results in a total deduction of $23,750 and taxable income of $46,250.

‘The truth is not an inconvenience’: Zelenskiy backs Olympian Hraskovic after IOC row over war tribute helmets MORE SPORTS NEWS

0

'The truth is not an inconvenience': Zelenskiy backs Olympian Hraskevich after IOC row over war-salut helmets
Ukraine’s Vladyslav Heraskevych wears a custom-made helmet during a training session. (AP/PTI Photo)

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed support for skeleton racer Vladislav Hraskevich after the athlete claimed the International Olympic Committee (IOC) banned him from wearing a helmet commemorating Ukrainian athletes killed in the war with Russia.Push boundaries with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!Ukrainian Winter Olympics flag-bearer Hraskevich revealed in a social media post that his custom-made helmet – which bears the likenesses of male and female athletes killed since Russia invaded in 2022 – has been banned from training and competing at the Italian Winter Olympics. “This breaks my heart,” the 27-year-old wrote, adding that he would submit a formal appeal and continue to seek permission to use the design.

Meloni Brands Olympic rioters branded ‘Italy’s enemies’ in dangerous street war in Milan watch

The IOC has yet to publicly confirm the reported decision, but the controversy has prompted a strong response from Kyiv. Zelensky praised Hraskevich’s efforts to bring global attention to the conflict, writing on the “This fact cannot be inconvenient, inappropriate or be called a ‘political demonstration at a sporting event’. It reminds the world what modern Russia is like.”

polling

Do you support Vladyslav Heraskevych’s call for helmets to be worn in honor of Ukrainian athletes?

The controversy comes as Article 50 of Olympic rules limits political posturing during games, but athletes are still free to express their views at press conferences and online. Ukraine’s sports minister, Matviy Bidnyi, recently said the Russian intrusion had claimed the lives of “more than 650 athletes and coaches.”Hraskevich explained in the video that the image on his helmet represents only a small portion of those who have passed away, which includes Olympians and Youth Olympic medalists such as figure skater Dmytro Chapar. The skeleton racer, competing in his third Winter Olympics, says his mission is about more than just sports.

No-confidence move against Om Birla: Why Rahul Gandhi didn’t sign the notice | India News

0

No-confidence move against Om Birla: Why Rahul Gandhi didn't sign the notice
Rahul Gandhi (file photo)

New Delhi: Congress MP and Lok Sabha leader Rahul Gandhi is yet to sign the notice of no-confidence motion moved by the opposition party against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, party sources said on Tuesday.Congress sources said that in a parliamentary democracy, it is considered inappropriate for the leader of the opposition to sign a petition seeking the removal of the Speaker, ANI reported. The development comes amid a sharp rise in tensions between the government and the opposition, which has accused the speaker of conducting House proceedings with “blatant partisanship”.Earlier, the opposition parties submitted a notice of no-confidence to Speaker Om Birla under Article 94(c) of the Constitution. Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the notification was formally submitted under Rule 94C of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business at 1.14 pm.Congress said a total of 118 members signed the notice. The motion has the support of political parties including the Congress, Samajwadi Party and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). However, the Trinamool Congress (TMC) has not signed the notification so far.In the notice, opposition MPs alleged that the Speaker had consistently denied them opportunities to raise issues of public importance. They cited several grievances, including the refusal to allow Rahul Gandhi to speak during the debate on the motion of thanking the President for his address, suspension of opposition MPs and what they said was a lack of action over remarks made by BJP MP Nisikant Dubey against the former prime minister.Senior Congress leader KC Venugopal on Monday said action was imminent, accusing the Speaker of bias. He said despite the parliamentary session, the leader of the opposition was not allowed to speak in the House.The Trinamool Congress, while critical of the functioning of the House, suggested that the opposition parties should first submit a formal appeal to the Speaker before moving a no-confidence motion. TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee said his party would consider supporting the motion if the Speaker fails to act on such an appeal within two to three days.However, the government downplayed the opposition’s move. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the opposition did not have the numbers needed to pass the resolution and accused it of disrupting parliamentary proceedings.Union Minister and BJP MP Chirag Paswan also criticized the motion, calling it “reprehensible” and claiming that repeated interference by the opposition had led to the ongoing deadlock in the House.Under Section 94(c) of the Constitution, the Speaker of the House of Representatives may remove the Speaker by resolution after a mandatory notice period of 14 days. The move comes against the backdrop of multiple adjournments during the budget session and protests in the Lok Sabha, with both sides blaming each other for the deadlock.

T20 World Cup: Pastelid’s all-round talent helps Netherlands beat Namibia by 7 wickets | Cricket News

0

T20 World Cup: Pastelid's all-round talent helps Netherlands beat Namibia by 7 wickets
Netherlands captain Scott Edwards (L) and Netherlands captain Bas De Lid walk off the field after their win against Namibia during the T20 World Cup cricket match between Namibia and the Netherlands in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Manish Swarup)

New Delhi: A few days ago in Colombo, the Netherlands lost control of the game in the final few games against Pakistan, but on Tuesday, the Dutch all-rounder Lower Lid Ensured there were no hiccups this time around and led his team to their first win of the T20 World Cup, beating Namibia by seven wickets.Bath’s father, Tim de Lid, also played for the Netherlands and took his first international wicket, dismissing Sachin Tendulkar in the 2003 ODI World Cup. Bass showcased his all-round ability to help his team stay alive in the tournament at Delhi’s Firoz Shah Kotla Ground.

How PCB, ICC, BCB reach resolution for India vs Pakistan T20 World Cup match

After reducing Namibia to 156 for 8, Pastelid led the Netherlands home with a 12-ball win. Delide remained unbeaten with 72 off 48 balls.Delide has received strong support from all parties Colin AckermanHe scored 32 goals from 28 goals and Michael Levitt scored 28 goals from 15 goals in the opener. His 70-run partnership with Ackerman for the third wicket proved to be a game-changing partnership.Meanwhile, Namibia, inspired by the Netherlands, also started a spin attack and found immediate success, with Max O’Dowd being caught by the Namibia skipper in the third over off a faster back delivery by left-arm orthodox Bernard Scholtz.Left-arm pacer Reuben Troupelmann dismissed Michael Levitt on the third ball of the sixth over, but the 22-year-old batsman did enough damage with an innings of 28 off 15 balls as the Netherlands ended the powerplay at 50 for 2.Ackermann was knocked out in the 13th hole by Steenkamp in the 10th hole. The Netherlands still needed 80 runs in the final half of the innings and Ackerman’s wicket would put pressure on them, but Steenkamp was unable to take a regular catch at deep square leg.Namibia got off to a slow start after taking the field. Louren Steenkamp and Jan Frylinck opened the innings, with Netherlands starting with deputy Aryan Dutt. The lanky spinner had Steenkamp stranded midway on the track and the right-handed batsman was stumped by Netherlands captain Scott Edwards in the third over.The Dutch bowlers made the most of the conditions, hitting four spins in the powerplay, while the Namibia Eagles managed just 40 runs in the first six overs, hitting just three boundaries and four sixes.Jan Frylinck’s innings never clicked and he ended summarily when he was caught by Edwards Logan VanBeekNamibia’s bowling scored 65 runs off 2 balls after 10 overs.It was not until captain Gerhard Erasmus joined forces with left-hander Jan Nicol Loftie-Eaton in the midfield that Namibia’s run rate improved and they scored 29 points in the next two rounds, taking their total score in 12 rounds to 94 points.However, Erasmus, who scored 18 goals with 9 goals, was stuck in midfield in the 13th round. Loftie-Eaton’s 42 off 38 balls was followed by Namibia’s defeat of 107 for 4 in the 15th over.Namibia lost Reuben Troupelmann’s batting ability in the final innings, with Dylan Letcher’s poor call resulting in Troupelmann being dismissed for 9 runs.

polling

Should Pastelid be considered as one of the key players for Netherlands in this T20 World Cup?

Namibia finished with 156 runs for eight in 20 overs, helped in part by some regular captaincy from Scott Edwards, as none of the four successful Dutch bowlers completed their full quota. Aryan Dutt conceded just 13 runs in three overs and took one wicket, while Logan van Beek and Bas de Leede took two wickets each.Jan Nicol Loftie-Eaton was Namibia’s top scorer with 42 goals, while opener Jan Frylinck scored 30 goals from 26 goals.summary scoreNamibia: 156/8 in 20 overs (Jan Nicol Loftie-Eaton 42, Jan Frylinck 30; Logan van Beek 2/13, Bas de Leede 2/20).Netherlands: 159/3 in 18 overs (Bas de Leede 72 not out, Colin Ackerman 32).