Dhakshineswar Suresh announces himself as India’s latest davis cup On Sunday, he beat the Netherlands 3-2 in the decisive fifth set and led the hosts into the second round of qualifying. The 25-year-old is making his second Davis Cup appearance and his performance will be remembered for years to come. Dhakshineswar won the singles match and partnered with Yuki Bhambri to win the doubles match, completing a rare three-match singles win for India. The feat will inevitably draw comparisons with Leander Paes’ legendary heroics against Japan in 2004, when Paes single-handedly won both singles and doubles to lead India to promotion. More than 20 years later, Dhakshineswar produced a similar defining moment. Ranked as low as 465th, he withstood huge pressure in the last game and defeated Guy de Oden 6-4, 7-6(4). When his final forehand winner landed, Dakshineswar fell on his back before being engulfed by his teammates and hoisted onto their shoulders, a celebration that marked another memorable European scalp for India. India started the match at a disadvantage but found their chance when the Netherlands arrived without its two top singles players – world No. 29 Talon Grikspoor and world No. 67 Botik van der Zandshulp. The absence gave India, who are ranked 33rd on the Davis Cup standings, a real chance and they seized it to defeat the world’s sixth-ranked team. The victory was also historic. This is the first time India has reached the second round of qualifying since the revamped Davis Cup format was introduced in 2019, taking them one step closer to the Elite Eight finals. South Korea is expected to be their next opponent. At the start of Sunday’s game, the two sides were tied at 1-1. Dakshwar and Bhambri then defeated David Pell and Sander Arends 7-6 (0), 3-6, 7-6 (1) in a gripping doubles match, giving India a 2-1 lead. The match lasted nearly three hours, with the two sides going back and forth until the home team kept their cool in both tiebreaks. Sumit Nagar Had a chance to end the tie on the first reverse single, but failed to capitalize. After winning the first set, he lost to world No. 88 Jesper de Jong 7-5, 1-6, 4-6 in a match that lasted nearly three hours. This was Nagal’s second defeat in his first singles match. That puts the onus squarely on Dakshineswar, whom captain Rohit Rajpal calls his “ace”. Despite being on the court for nearly three hours earlier in the day’s doubles match, Dakshineswar showed no signs of fatigue in the deciding set. His serve once again proved decisive. Dhakshineswar hit 15 aces and was always in control of the match after serving. In the seventh game, Deoden made consecutive backhand errors, and he got a key break in the first set. Although Dakshineswar missed a set point in the ninth game, he immediately rallied and sealed the victory with an ace on his second chance. The second set was even closer. De Oden fought hard and saved a break point in the fifth game with a forehand winner. Dakshineswar broke again at 4-4, but then came under pressure on serve and held on to hold on to the tiebreaker. There, his composure and strength came to the fore, finishing the game off to earn the hosts an unforgettable victory. Earlier in the day, the doubles match set the tone for India’s success. Rajpal’s bold decision to field Dhakshineswar in place of N Sriram Balaji proved to be a high-stakes match. The first set was a test of patience. Bembry’s serve came under constant pressure, especially in the long seventh game, which saw multiple break points. Despite double faults and a few missed chances, the Indian pair survived on the back of Dakshineswar’s sharp performance at the net. Neither side was able to force a breakthrough and the set entered a tiebreaker. There, India suddenly took the lead, going 4-0 up and finishing the game without conceding a point, highlighted by Dhakshineswar’s sharp passing winner and Bhambri’s clean return winner. The momentum shifted for the Dutch in the second set. Bambry’s first serve was in trouble again, and the visiting team got a crucial break opportunity to even the score. The deciding set turned into a battle of endurance. India created several chances early, including 0-40 on Pell’s serve, but failed to convert. Dakshineswar then saved a break point in the next game to keep the score alive for India. More chances came and went, until the turning point came when Arends took a medical timeout on his left hand to receive treatment. From that moment on, his serve dropped and the Indian eventually took control of the match, ending the match in a tie-break with India just one win away from victory. Dakshineswar ensured there were no delays thereafter, completing one of India’s most memorable Davis Cup victories in recent years under pressure.
‘Reject this’: Tej Pratap Yadav refutes child rumors, says no link to women mentioned in past Facebook posts | India News
New Delhi: Janshakti Janata Dal (JJD) chief Taj Pratap Yadav On Sunday, he strongly denied rumors circulating on social media that a woman he was allegedly linked to had given birth to his child, calling the claims false and defamatory. He accused political opponents and former colleagues of deliberately spreading misinformation and said he would take action litigation.The former Bihar minister told an evening press conference that the rumors had caused him severe mental distress and were part of a targeted smear campaign. He claims the speculation has resurfaced just months after a controversy that led to his expulsion from the league. people’s party (RJD), led by his father Lalu Prasad.“I am distraught as rumors spread on social media that a woman with whom I had false links a few months ago, which led to my expulsion from the party, gave birth to my child,” Yadav said.Giving context to the controversy, Yadav recalled that a post on his Facebook account went viral last year, claiming that he was “in a relationship for 12 years” with a woman. He reiterated that he did not write the post and claimed that his social media accounts had been compromised.He claimed that the post was the result of a “hack” by what he called “five Jaichands” (to use a traitor metaphor). Mentioning their names publicly, Yadav said: “There has been some suspense as to who the Jaichand members I am talking about are. The names are: Mukesh Raushan, Sanjay Yadav, Shakti Singh Yadav, Rameez and Sunil Singh.”Notably, Sanjay Yadav is a sitting member of the RJD Rajya Sabha, Sunil Singh is a member of the Legislative Council, Mukesh Raushan and Shakti Singh Yadav are former MLAs, while Rameez is believed to be in a relationship with Tej Pratap’s brother, RJD National working president Tejashwi Yadav is close.Yadav categorically denied the latest claims, telling reporters, “I completely reject this claim. This has created controversy and Akash Bhatti will reveal the truth. They are trying to defame me. I will go to court.”He said he came to know about the rumors after union minister Jitan Ram Manjhi “congratulated” him on the birth of his alleged child, which he said shocked him.Yadav also linked the new controversy to his recent political activities. “Recently, I hosted a well-attended party on the occasion of Makar Sankranti. This made my critics wary of the prospects of my party. I will seek legal action against them. I will move the court. I am also seeking appointment with Home Minister Samrat Chaudhry,” he said.He called for an end to the speculation, adding: “I beg those who criticize me to let me live in peace. I know someone who is related to this woman and I believe he is the father of the child. They dragged my name and caused me mental anguish. “Tej Pratap Yadav was expelled from the RJD last year over a Facebook post that sparked public reaction over what the party said was a “serious violation of moral and social values”. The incident intensified long-standing controversies surrounding him, including his tense marriage to Aishwarya, the granddaughter of former Bihar chief minister Daroga Rai. Aishwarya left their matrimonial home just months after the wedding, alleging abuse, and the divorce case is still pending in court.Since his expulsion, Yadav has come up with his own political outfit, the BJP, and has repeatedly ruled out a return to the RJD, saying he “would choose death rather than return to the party.” He insists his political journey has been guided by “principles and self-respect” rather than a pursuit of power.
New Epstein dossier raises doubts about Epstein’s date and cause of death; CCTV glitches, prison timeline and more
Jeffrey Epstein’s death has long been the subject of conspiracy theories. Now, there is another theory, but it is supported by solid evidence. Latest files related to the investigation into a convicted sex financier and pedophile have raised concerns about the exact date and cause of his death.

Draft federal statement announcing Epstein’s death, no. European Free Trade Association 00013180 In the Justice Department archives, the date is the day before the 66-year-old’s official death date. The draft is dated August 9, 2019, while the sex financier’s official death date is August 10.
Epstein was found dead in his cell at a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial on federal trafficking charges.
Read more: ‘Is Jeffrey Epstein still alive?’: The truth behind viral photos in Epstein documents release
What does the document stipulate?
“This morning, the Manhattan Correctional Center confirmed that Jeffrey Epstein, who the office charged with engaging in sex trafficking of minors, was found unresponsive in his cell and pronounced dead a short time later,” then-Manhattan U.S. Attorney Jeffrey S. Berman wrote in a statement.
“Today’s events are disturbing and we are deeply aware that they may present yet another hurdle in court for Epstein’s many victims.
“To the brave young women who have come forward, and the many others who have yet to come forward, let me reiterate that we remain committed to your defense and to the investigation of the conduct alleged in the indictment.”
Epstein’s final moments
Epstein has been imprisoned at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York since July 6, 2019, awaiting trial. A month later, he was found unconscious in his cell. Paramedics attempted to resuscitate him but were unsuccessful, and the New York City medical examiner ultimately ruled his death a suicide by hanging.
Read more: Dalai Lama’s office says no links to Epstein after ‘repeated mentions’ in reporting documents
Security failure and missing checks
Records later showed that corrections officers failed to complete mandatory rounds the night Epstein died. Scheduled 3am and 5am checks never took place, and several cameras outside his cell were reportedly malfunctioning.
Investigators noted that they were unable to establish a clear timeline of events because the lapses left many unanswered questions. To date, authorities have not released an official time of death.
monitoring gap
One of the most controversial pieces of evidence involves security footage taken on Aug. 9. According to official reports, video from the stairs leading to Epstein’s floor was cut off shortly before midnight. Additional footage later showed an unexplained shape moving in the direction of Epstein’s cell.
An FBI report describes the moment: At 10:39 p.m., “an orange flash appeared to be coming up the L stairs, possibly an inmate being escorted to that level.”
However, the Justice Department’s inspector general offered a conflicting explanation, saying: “Inmates are currently on lockdown; someone may be moving inmates’ sheets or bedding.”
“At approximately 10:39 p.m., an unidentified police officer appears to be walking up the L stairs before re-appearing in view of the camera at 10:41 p.m.”
Forensic experts consulted by CBS in 2019 also weighed in. “Based on the limited video available, it’s more likely this was a clothed person,” said Conor McCourt, a retired NYPD officer. [orange] uniform. Video expert Jim Safford and four colleagues agreed, saying: “It would be wrong to say it’s impossible for someone to reach his room via the stairs without being seen.” “
Former Attorney General Bill Barr said in a 2019 interview that he reviewed surveillance footage and confirmed that no one entered Epstein’s area.
Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said on Fox News: “The video is clear. He was the only person there and the only person who came out. You can see it. We’re working hard to clear it to make sure you get enhanced information.” [version] We’ll provide the originals so you don’t think there’s anything hoaxy involved. “

