Harris County District Judge Nathan Milliron is facing scrutiny. It comes after a court video and newly emerged emails that went viral showed his behavior toward court staff and attorneys.
Who is Nathan Milliron?
According to the New York Post, Mililon serves as a judge on the 215th Civil Court and has been a judge since January 2025. As an elected official, he oversees civil cases for one of the following agencies: Texas‘The busiest judicial system.
What sparked the controversy?
The backlash came after a live court video showed Milliron furious with an IT worker who was assisting with a technical issue.
In the video, after the staff member attempts to resolve the issue and makes a flippant remark, Milliron responds sharply: “Stop joking… I’m serious about this,” before telling the employee to “get out of my room.” court“.
He also appeared visibly frustrated and said he was “tired” of the situation, the video shows.
Also read: A ballroom without Trump? Judge halts construction of White House project; Congress decides
Emails show more intense exchanges
The controversy intensified after emails obtained by local media and reported by the New York Post showed that Mililon used strong language toward court staff.
“This is no longer a request. Find me a clerk who will respond to me and get the job done!” he wrote in one message.
In another letter, he emphasized his authority, saying he deserved the same respect as a “duly elected judge” and referring to an employee as a “subordinate.”
During one exchange, he said, “That’s an order!”
Conflicts with lawyers and the legal profession
The situation escalated further when defense attorney James Stafford sent Millilon an email urging him to apologize for his actions.
Mililon instead ordered a lawyer to appear in court to express his “opinion,” NBC News reported. “I’ve never seen a judge do that,” Stafford later said.
Ethical Issues and Penalties
Other reports also raised questions about Merillon’s compliance with state ethics laws.
Texas Ethics Commission records show he was overdue in filing required documents, including campaign finance and personal financial disclosures.
he faced civil penalties According to the New York Post, the errors cost the company a total of $1,500.
