Categories: WORLD

Trump’s new order makes it easier to fire federal agency workers at will: explained

U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order changing job protections for some federal employees in policy-related positions. According to Bloomberg, the order eliminates job security protections for nearly 8,000 federal positions. If these workers do not implement or support the president’s policy decisions, they may be more susceptible to being fired.

U.S. President Donald Trump displays the signed executive order in the Oval Office of the White House. (Bloomberg)

The Office of Personnel Management’s initial estimate was much higher, saying as many as 50,000 federal employee May belong to a new category. That means about 2 percent of the federal workforce will be moved into a new category that now allows for at-will firing.

ALSO READ | Is Trump’s Iran War Over? What a War Powers Resolution vote means in negotiations – explained

Who is subject to the new rules

The order applies primarily to senior federal workers, mostly GS-15 and above, which is the highest level in the federal pay system. These positions include senior agency officials, deputy directors, chief of staffregional office heads, and senior policy, budget, human resources, grants, and public affairs staff. Some positions in the Office of Management and Budget also fall under this change.

These jobs will now fall under a new classification called “Schedule Policy/Careers.”

What will happen to employees?

Workers who fall into this category will lose several civil service protections. They can be fired more easily and, in many cases, lose the right to appeal to an independent review body.

The administration designed the change to give the president more direct control over senior policy implementation roles.

ALSO READ | With many wondering the president’s whereabouts, Trump made the big announcement: “I’m going to…”

Government’s position

The government said the change improved government accountability. Agencies often have difficulty firing employees for poor performance or inappropriate behavior, according to a federal rule cited in a CNN report in February. It argued that the new system would allow for faster dismissal of employees who do not perform their duties or resist presidential directives.

Scott Kupol, head of the Office of Personnel Management, said senior policy officials must actively pursue the president’s agenda because leadership is elected by voters.

“From our perspective, a lot of this has to do with accountability,” he told Bloomberg. “In order to influence the government’s policy priorities, we need to have people involved in these high-level decisions willing and able to visibly implement these directives.”

He also said the order did not introduce a political loyalty test. “There’s zero loyalty test in this,” Cooper said. “Nor does it interfere with normal whistleblower protections.”

worry

Federal employee unions strongly opposed the order. The American Federation of Government Employees argued that the policy weakened the merit-based civil service and opened the door to politically driven hiring and firing.

Public policy groups have also raised concerns. They warned the change could reduce the independence of the federal workforce and allow political considerations to influence career government roles.

background

The policy draws on provisions in the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which allows certain positions involving policy development or policy advocacy to be exempt from standard job protections.

A similar effort during Trump’s first term, known as “Plan F,” aimed at reclassifying federal employees, did not fully take effect before the end of his presidency.

(Inputs from Bloomberg)

WEB DESK TEAM

Our team of more than 15 experienced writers brings diverse perspectives, deep research, and on-the-ground insights to deliver accurate, timely, and engaging stories. From breaking news to in-depth analysis, they are committed to credibility, clarity, and responsible journalism across every category we cover.

Recent Posts

Social Security cuts could affect more than 15% of people in 47 states, with benefit losses likely to exceed $500

According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), Social Security's retirement program currently provides benefits to 63 million…

24 minutes ago

Carmelo Anthony trial: Protests break out outside Texas courthouse, supporters chant ‘self-defense is not a crime’ | WATCH

Protests erupt outside Texas courthouse Carmelo Anthony Videos on social media showed the trial taking place. On Wednesday, June 3,…

50 minutes ago

401(k) balances to drop 4% in 2026 as Americans continue to save for retirement; learn about recent trends and changes

401(k) retirement accounts declined in early 2026, with several American Check in on your retirement savings after the turbulence of…

1 hour ago

ChudTheBuilder’s launch bid stalls despite Alex Rosen’s $100K bond, new details emerge

New details emerge as ChudTheBuilder's launch bid stalls despite Alex Rosen posting $100,000 bond (Image via Getty) Dalton Eatherly, better…

2 hours ago

Planning to move abroad? Your Social Security benefits will change as follows

More people are leaving the United States than moving into it. According to a report by The Motley Fool, the…

2 hours ago

‘A brother in a wheelchair?’: Collarbone rhinoplasty recovery photos spark speculation about leg lengthening surgery

Collarbone's new rhinoplasty recovery photo sparks speculation of leg lengthening surgery (Image via Getty) Social media celebrity Collarbone recently garnered…

3 hours ago