Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
THE_LOCAL_REPORT_ARTICLES_LOGO THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES

Trusted Indian news delivering fast, factual, and in-depth coverage of politics, business, society, and stories that truly matter

THE_LOCAL_REPORT_ARTICLES_LOGO THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES

Trusted Indian news delivering fast, factual, and in-depth coverage of politics, business, society, and stories that truly matter

  • TRENDING
  • INDIA
  • SPORTS
  • TECH
  • UK
  • WORLD
  • TRENDING
  • INDIA
  • SPORTS
  • TECH
  • UK
  • WORLD
Subscribe
Close

Search

Sabarimala entry case: Supreme Court Justice Nagarathna says women cannot be treated as 'untouchables' for three days
INDIA

Sabarimala entry case: Supreme Court Justice Nagarathna says women cannot be treated as ‘untouchables’ for three days

By WEB DESK TEAM
April 7, 2026 2 Min Read
Comments Off on Sabarimala entry case: Supreme Court Justice Nagarathna says women cannot be treated as ‘untouchables’ for three days

New Delhi: Women cannot be treated as ‘untouchable’ for three consecutive days in a month and then cease to be so on the fourth day, Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna made the remarks while hearing a case including the Sabarimala issue on Tuesday.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, said he strongly disagreed with the 2018 Sabarimala judgment’s view that banning women between the ages of 10 and 50 from entering temples amounted to “untouchability” under Article 17 of the Constitution. “In the context of Sabarimala, I don’t know how to argue Section 17. As a woman, there can be no untouchability for three days in a month and no untouchability on the fourth day,” Justice Nagarathna said.This observation was in response to Mehta’s statement: “India does not have patriarchy or gender stereotypes as it is understood in the West.”In the Sabarimala case, Justice DY Chandrachud held that barring women from entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, whether because of age or menstrual status, amounted to “untouchability”, placed them in a “subordinate” position, reinforced “patriarchy” and undermined their dignity.Mehta said the ban on women from entering the Sabarimala temple has nothing to do with menstruation and is imposed only on certain age groups.“Let us be clear. Sabarimala is only about a certain age group. There should be no confusion. Lord Ayyappa temples across the country and across the world are open to women of all ages. Only one temple has such restriction. This is a special case,” he said.The nine-judge bench was hearing petitions alleging discrimination against women at religious places like the Sabarimala temple in Kerala and examining the extent and limits of religious freedom for different faiths. The Constitution bench included Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices BV Nagarathna, MM Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi.

Tags:

breaking newsconstitutional rightsGoogle NewsIndiaIndia news todayindian newsJustice BV NagarathnaSabarimala casesexismSupreme CourtToday's newsuntouchablewomen's rights
Author

WEB DESK TEAM

Our team of more than 15 experienced writers brings diverse perspectives, deep research, and on-the-ground insights to deliver accurate, timely, and engaging stories. From breaking news to in-depth analysis, they are committed to credibility, clarity, and responsible journalism across every category we cover.

Follow Me
Other Articles
Iranian Navy says it shot down US MQ9 drone over Qeshm Island and shares video
Previous

Iranian Navy says it shot down US MQ9 drone over Qeshm Island and shares video

ISSF World Cup: Palak, Mukesh win gold medal in world record
Next

ISSF World Cup: Palak, Mukesh win gold medal in world record

Copyright 2026 — THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme