New Delhi: The Center has laid out an ambitious vision for artificial intelligence that is directly borrowed from one of India’s biggest digital success stories – UPI.The idea, officials say, is to provide the world with “a range of trustworthy AI solutions”: a shared, reliable digital backbone that countries and companies can build on without being locked into proprietary platforms or paying royalties to a dominant few.Electronics and Information Technology Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said on Tuesday that India wants to shape how global artificial intelligence is developed and governed by balancing innovation with accountability and using its own “techno-legal” approach rather than copying the European Union’s regulatory framework or the US’s market-driven model.Explaining the similarities with UPI, Vaishnaw said India’s strength lies in building frugal, low-cost engineering solutions that work at scale and can be shared as global public goods. “We will create a series of solutions that have been tested for safety and all possible parameters, and then we will present the same solutions to the world for use and development,” he said.Just as UPI is available globally, India also intends to share its AI capabilities in a similar spirit. “We are not asking for any royalty or license fee. We have made it a common core,” the minister said, adding that some countries have shown interest in adopting a digital framework similar to India’s.This approach also defines sovereign AI, Vaishnaw said, clarifying that it does not mean cutting off global cooperation. “Sovereign AI means having our own models, infrastructure, and the ability to deliver solutions to large numbers of people without having to rely on anyone else’s approval,” the minister said.The push comes against a backdrop of global anxiety about artificial intelligence — from job losses and a volatile tech market to worries about the monopoly of big tech companies.“There is a good consensus emerging among global leaders that artificial intelligence should be used for good and all harmful effects should be contained,” he said.To address workforce issues, the government is working on three fronts simultaneously: retraining the existing workforce, creating new talent pipelines and updating education curricula, the minister said. “Those three things are happening simultaneously,” the minister said.India is also expanding its artificial intelligence infrastructure, with plans to add 20,000 GPUs to its general computing facilities in the next six months to support startups, researchers and students.
Nerdeen Kiswani’s ‘dog’ remark puts Mamdani in crossfire; Rep. Randy Fine says ‘choice’ between dogs and Muslims isn’t hard
Nerdeen Kiswani, a Palestinian-American activist whose recent comments about “dogs” sparked backlash, New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani Caught in the crossfire. Kiswani commented: “New York City is finally starting to embrace Islam. Dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as indoor pets. As we have said all along, they are unclean.”

She later clarified that her post was sarcastic, but it had already angered Congressman Randy Fine. The Republican congressman commented on X: “If they force us to choose, then we choose between dogs and dogs.” Muslim It’s not difficult. “
While he was slammed for the bigoted remarks, Fine doubled down, saying: “What’s really disgusting is that one of Mamdani’s key advisers said we have to give up our dogs because ‘New York is going to Islam.’ We don’t feel ashamed like Europeans for being conquered. I choose my dogs. If you’re manly enough to debate me, I’ll be on your show.”
It is worth noting that Fine’s statement that Kiswani was Mamdani’s adviser is not correct. Although Kiswani is president of the New York-based organization Our Lives for Our Lives (WOL), she has no ties to Mamdani’s government. In fact, the activist once criticized the current New York City mayor for not being radical enough.
Fine now also faces calls from Democrats and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a major Islamic civil rights group, to resign over his comments.
ALSO READ | Zohran Mamdani New York City mayor’s ‘astonishingly low’ salary sparks controversy
Amid the controversy surrounding Kiswani’s comments, she also poked fun at her apparent authority and wrote “For those who may care, effective immediately, I will be resigning from the position that many of you seemed convinced I held. While it is an honor to exercise this level of imagined authority, I believe it is time to step aside so that the public can recover from the trauma of the tweets. I wish my successor the best in this critical role.”
Meanwhile, her comments and Fine’s mistaken association with Mamdani meant the New York City mayor was dragged into the crossfire.
Zoran Mamdani faces harsh criticism over Swani’s ‘dog’ comments
Although Fine mistakenly linked the Swani and Mamdani languages, the latter sparked outrage online. “Mamdani will learn that Americans love their pets and we will never apologize for that. Dogs, cats, horses, pigs, goats, cows, squirrels, raccoons, birds, alpacas, donkeys, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, turtles, fish. America loves its animals,” one person said.
Another added, “You know what, I’m all for Mamdani taking the dogs away. Nothing will turn a liberal white woman into a Republican faster than someone trying to take the dogs away.”
Another said: “Congratulations New York! Dogs will be banned in Mamdani. You voted for this.”
However, Mamdani did not say anything about the ban on dog ownership, nor did he comment on the controversy sparked by Kiswani’s remarks.
After a video was shared of New York City showing large amounts of feces visible on the streets after a snowstorm, Kiswani sparked outrage by suggesting that getting rid of dogs might solve the problem.
“It’s funny that the right uses this to blame Mamdani, and when I complain about the same thing, blaming people who have dogs instead of Mamdani, the right also attacks and threatens me…” she commented.
The ongoing feud with far-right commentators and longtime allies of Donald Trump shows no signs of abating, Laura Loomerjoined the debate, commenting on Kiswani, saying “Yes, it’s human poop. Not dog poop.”
‘I’d be okay with that’: Anchor Rakai shares Deion Sanders’ college football commentary after NFL Pro Bowl celebrity reaction
Deion Sanders isn’t staying silent after streamer Rakai shared a bold story online. The Colorado Buffaloes head coach attended the NFL’s Pro Bowl weekend on Feb. 15, where he coached a celebrity flag football game. After the game, Lackey, a 17-year-old YouTuber with nearly 940,000 subscribers, said on his live broadcast that Sanders told him he should leave the broadcast and play college football games.This statement quickly attracted people’s attention. Shortly after, a video from Well Off Media showed Sanders reacting when asked about Lackey’s words. Sanders looked up from his barber’s chair and said, “Can you call Lackey and we can talk about this?” Then he added: “I love him, I think he’s doing a great job, he’s talented. I don’t know if he’s a college athlete now. So while Deion Sanders praised the teen’s efforts, he also made it clear that he doesn’t fully support the idea of college admissions.
Deion Sanders responds to Rakai’s college football claims NFL Pro Bowl celebrity games
During his live broadcast, Lackey said, “Dean said, I’m not going to lie, Brody, you want to drop all the streaming stuff and play college ball. I’m going to be okay with that.” Lackey also told his viewers, “I know I’m good at football, but I’m not going to do all of that.”However, Sanders’ public reaction differed from this story. In the same Well Off Media video, Sanders later sent out a strong message that many fans could relate to. He said: “I’m here to tell you, you need to play. What does that mean? You’re on the sidelines. You’re on the bench. You’re not even in this thing. You’re just in the stands talking, talking, talking, talking. But to those guys, you have a lot to say. Maybe enter a competition. What are you afraid of, what are you afraid of, but forget your yesterday and don’t be afraid of tomorrow. You can’t win if you’re not in the game, but you always have something to say. I need you to shut up and get in on the game. “Sanders did not directly name Lackey in that speech. Still, because of the way the video was edited, many viewers felt the timing wasn’t random.On the field, Lakay actually performed well in a celebrity event. He moves quickly, avoids defenders, and makes plays in defense. But flag football on a celebrity show is much different than Power 4 college football. There is no public record of Lackey’s official height or weight. From the video, he looks smaller than most college graduates, which is important for a student at that level.At the same event, Sanders also poked fun at comedian Druski’s performance, jokingly saying, “You give the other team everything you’ve got.” That moment also went viral, showcasing Sanders’ humor and honesty.At this time, there is no evidence that Sanders offered Lackey an actual college contract. What’s clear is that one live comment turned an entertaining celebrity match into a massive online debate between football fans and live fans.
Gujarat electoral roll drops 13% to 440 million after deleting 7.7 million people India News
AHMEDABAD: Gujarat’s electoral strength fell by 13.4 per cent with 44 crore voters as more than 77 lakh voters were removed from the 2025 rolls after completion of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and 9.5 lakh new voters were added to the final list released on Tuesday. The double-digit percentage drop capped two rounds of reviews, with 73.7 million pieces of information removed when a draft was released in December last year following updates to mortality records, immigration data and misregistrations. A further 390,000 names were removed before the final list was released. From the announcement of the draft to the final ballot, the number of voters increased by 1.3%, with a large proportion of them voting for the first time. In the unrevised 2025 electoral roll, some 4 million voters were found to have been permanently moved, 1.8 million people died, 980,000 people could not trace their registration addresses, and 380,000 people had duplicate voter cards.The names of another 1.9 lakh voters in Gujarat were omitted for other reasons. After the draft list was announced, an additional 390,000 names were deleted based on objections and further verification.Ahmedabad district has the largest electorate in Gujarat with a population of 4.91 millionAhmedabad topped the state with 49.1 million voters in the final ballot, higher than the 48 million voters in the draft list. The constituency also set a record for the largest number of new voters, with 150,000 new voters. In percentage terms, Dang had the highest increase at 2.15%, although its total number of voters was 190,000. Other districts that saw significant percentage growth include Porbandar (2.1%), Jamnagar (2%), Botad (1.9%), Chhota Udepur (1.9%) and Gandhinagar (1.8%).Surat, Vadodara and Rajkot reported significant increases, reflecting migration patterns and youth enrollment. Surat added over 100,000 voters while deleting 85,734 voters, the most among the cities.
‘He must be looked after and respected’: Sourav Ganguly backs Imran Khan’s appeal Cricket News
Former India captain Sourav Ganguly calls out former India captain Sourav Ganguly Pakistan captain Imran Khan He was treated with dignity and appropriate care amid growing concerns about health conditions in prison.Ganguly’s comments followed a joint appeal by 14 former national team captains from the five Test-matching nations urging the Pakistani government to ensure improved prison conditions and proper medical care for the World Cup-winning leader. “They did the right thing. So, I am sure Imran Khan must be taken care of and respected,” Ganguly told reporters.
The petition, started by former Australia captain Greg Chappell, has been submitted to Prime Minister Sherbaz Sharif, The Age reported. Among the signatories were Indian greats Sunil Gavaskar and Kapil Devand Australia’s Allan Border, Steve WaughIan Chappell, Belinda Clark and Kim Hughes; England’s Mike Atherton, Nasser Hussain, Mike Brierley and David Gower; West Indies legend Clive Lloyd; and New Zealand’s John Wright.In the letter, the former captain expressed “deep concern” over reports of Khan’s deteriorating health, particularly that his eyesight had deteriorated significantly while incarcerated in Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail, where he was held for more than two years on corruption charges. They stressed that a man like him deserves humane treatment, medical care from experts of his choice, regular family visits and fair legal proceedings.The appeal highlights cricket’s long-standing role in promoting respect that transcends competition, urging authorities to uphold the principles of decency and justice. Gavaskar described the situation as “terrible” and noted that they had developed a long-standing friendship before the match on the field.Supporters claim Khan has lost 85% of the vision in his right eye and has struggled to get help from family and private doctors. He and his wife, Bushra Bibi, have been in prison since August 2023, with their most recent convictions totaling 31 years in prison.
Before politics drove them apart: How Jesse Jackson and Donald Trump really knew each other
Donald Trump has paid tribute to civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson following his death, calling him a long-time partner and inspiration. But the relationship between the two men was complex, ranging from collaborations in New York business circles to sharp political differences on the national stage.Jackson died on Tuesday at the age of 84. “It is with profound sadness that we announce the passing of civil rights leader and founder of the Rainbow Advance Alliance, the Reverend Jesse Louis Jackson Sr.,” the Rainbow Advance Alliance said in announcing his death. “He passed away peacefully Tuesday morning surrounded by his family.”
Trump’s tribute
Hours after Jackson’s death, Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social: “I knew him well long before he became president. He was a good man with great character, courage, and ‘street smarts.'” He was very gregarious—a man who truly loved people! “He added that he had supported Jackson’s organization for years, providing office space in Manhattan and shared many old photos with Hum. “While I have been wrongly called a racist by the thugs and lunatics of the radical left and all Democrats, I have always been happy to help Jesse along the way,” Trump wrote. He said Jackson “had been given space in Trump Tower at 40 Wall Street for many years.”“

Trump also credited Jackson’s advocacy with influencing some of his own policies. “Responded to his pleas for help passing and signing Criminal Justice Reform when other presidents would not even try; single-handedly pushed and passed long-term funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), something Jesse loved that no other president would have done,” he wrote. “Responded to Jesse’s support for Opportunity Zones, the most successful economic development plan ever approved for black businessmen/women, and more. Jesse has a force of nature like others before him. “
early cooperation
The two met in New York long before Trump entered politics. In the 1990s, Trump provided office space to Jackson’s Rainbow Initiative. At a 1999 news conference, Jackson called Trump a “friend” and said, “He’s also been there when it comes to reaching out and being inclusive.”Speaking at the same event, Trump joked about Jackson’s negotiating skills. “Jesse started by saying, ‘Most of the wealth in this country is in the hands of a few people.’ And I thought to myself: Is that a bad thing?” he said, drawing laughter. He added: “He’s a very tough negotiator… No, he’s a great guy. We love him and I will support him.”

political division
Their relationship changed after Trump entered politics. During the 2016 presidential campaign, Jackson supported Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. In an interview with Bloomberg TV that year, Jackson said Trump was “affable and sociable” in his early years but criticized his campaign stance.“These ideas are not only conservative, but they are somewhat off-center. They could be destabilizing for the country,” Jackson said of Trump’s policies on immigration, foreign affairs and health care. He refused to label Trump a racist, saying he didn’t want his campaign to revolve around “branding.”In 2020, Jackson supported veteran leader Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary.

jackson and obama
Trump’s most recent tribute also claimed Jackson helped elect Barack Obama, “a man Jesse couldn’t stand.” Jackson has publicly supported Obama, although he did make critical remarks during the 2008 campaign, which he later apologized for, saying he believed they were off the record.Obama also posted a tribute to Jackson on X: After Obama won in 2008, Jackson was visibly emotional. “We are a better America today,” he told CBS. “America is a work in progress, and last night we saw that work expressed in the most magnificent way possible.”For decades, Jackson remained one of America’s most prominent black leaders, twice elected as a presidential candidate and awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Hate speech PIL ‘targeted’ BJP CM: Supreme Court | India News
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday criticized 12 “eminent” persons who together filed a PIL “against” the chief minister of a BJP-ruled state, accusing him of hate speech, while calling for guidelines to be put in place to restrain constitutional officers and bureaucrats from violating loyalty to constitutional ethics. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioners, told a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices BV Nagarathna and Joymalya Bagchi that the atmosphere in the country had become toxic and “only the Supreme Court can and should remedy this.”However, the CJI-led bench was quick to point out that the petition selectively named individuals while highlighting the issues. “This petition is certainly targeted at certain individuals as it leaves out others who regularly make such hateful comments. Petitioners should not give the impression that they are targeting individuals. “The petitioners include Roop Rekha Verma, Mohd Adeep, Harsh Mander, Najeeb Jung, John Dayal and Ashok Kumar Sharma, citing hate speeches by BJP members Himanta Biswa Sarma, Yogi Adityanath, Devendra Fadnavis, Pushkar Singh Dhami, Anantkumar Hegde and Giriraj Singh, besides certain remarks by some bureaucrats.“Please file an impartial and neutral petition. This issue is important. At the end of the day, all parties must exercise restraint in their speech. What we want to say is that all party workers must keep in mind the constitutional ethics and exercise restraint in their speech and any guidelines should be universally applicable.”The judge said some political parties blatantly made statements based on their shared ideologies and openly expressed hatred. “You didn’t cite a single example of the other party.”When Sibal said he would delete all personal references in the petition, the bench responded that the PIL would be heard with necessary modifications.Justice Nagarathna said, “Political party leaders must promote brotherhood. Courts can pass orders. But the remedy lies in political parties and democratic institutions adhering to constitutional values and morals.” Justice Nagarathna added, “The origin of speech is the thought process. Can a court order to change or restrict a person’s thought process? What about freedom of expression?”“This is such a vague petition. Instead of it being a populist exercise, let it be a constructive constitutional exercise,” Justice Bacchi told Sibal. Dry politics should not determine the filing of a PIL. “Sibal sought two weeks to amend the PIL.The two prayers of the petitioners read like fundamental duties of citizens: a) State that public speech by constitutional functionaries or public officials must comply with constitutional morals and must not infringe upon the fundamental rights of others; b) Establish guidelines to govern the public speech of constitutional officers and bureaucrats to ensure fidelity to constitutional morals without imposing prior restrictions or censorship.
Tony Clark Family: Who is His Wife Frances? Everything focuses on their three children
The former Diamondbacks player’s family life has been thrust into the spotlight after ESPN reported that MLB Players Association executive director Tony Clark has resigned due to an alleged affair with his sister-in-law. Tony Clark is married to Frances Clark and they have three children: Jazzin, Aeneas and Kiara.

EPSN’s Jeff Passan reports that the MLBPA is about to launch an internal investigation into allegations of an “inappropriate affair” between Tony Clark and his sister-in-law. Clark’s sister-in-law has reportedly been an employee of the MLBPA since 2021.
As of now, the MLBPA or Clark have not confirmed the details of the allegations against the 57-year-old player. However, this brought his family life into the spotlight. In this article, we take a look at Clark’s family life: his wife Frances and their three children.
This story is being updated.
Madras HC overturns 2017 acquittals, convicts 21 in murder case | India News
CHENNAI: More than eight years after a trial court acquitted 23 people accused of killing a man during the 2013 Villupuram election contest, the Madras High Court on Tuesday overturned the order and convicted 21 of them and sentenced them to life imprisonment.A bench of Justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman said, “After careful re-evaluation of all the evidence on record, we find that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and proved that the accused were members of an unlawful assembly and that there was a common purpose to cause the death of the deceased.”According to the prosecution, there was previous animosity between Bhaskar and Krishnaveni over the Kilyanur panchayat elections. Around 12:30 a.m. on May 30, 2013, Krishnaveni and others gathered in front of Bhaskar’s home armed with deadly weapons. When Bhaskar tried to escape, he was hunted.On April 28, 2017, after the court concluded the trial, the 23 defendants were acquitted. Bhaskar’s wife Amuda subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court.
