Nancy Guthrie update: Reporter refutes report Savannah hired private investigator, ‘She remains confident…’
NewsNation senior national reporter Brian Entine debunked reports that Savannah Guthrie hired a private investigator to find her missing mother, Nancy Guthrie. The Sun newspaper previously reported that Savannah spent $500,000 Private investigators try to solve the case.
A report from Rob Shuter’s Naughty But Nice Substack states that Savannah hired private investigators to find Nancy. “Savannah is doing whatever it takes to keep the search going,” a source told Schuette on May 26. “She refuses to rely solely on law enforcement.”
“I have now confirmed that this is not true. Savannah Guthrie did not hire a private investigator, she did not spend $500,000 on a private investigator,” Entin said recently on “Jesse Weber Live.”
Learn more | Nancy Guthrie case: Former FBI agent reveals why Savannah Guthrie’s mom was ‘more vulnerable’ to attack
“It appears she still has full confidence in the FBI and local detectives who are investigating,” he added.
Latest updates
News 4 Tucson confirmed social media post saying a monument was set up in front of Tucson Nancy Guthrie’s House in memory of her has been deleted. More than three months have passed now Savannah The mother is missing. The suspect has not yet been identified.
The impromptu tribute included bright yellow flowers, handwritten notes and signs that read “Bring Nancy Home.”
Meanwhile, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos The recent revelations about the case explain why no arrests have been made months after Savannah Guthrie’s mother went missing. In an interview with KOLD-TV, Nanos defended what he called a “tedious” process.
“It’s not like a detective goes out and talks to someone and we can arrest him,” Nanos said. “This is a very sensitive case, but what really causes the case to drag on is that we do rely on the labs.” “When you look at these labs and the work they do, you see there’s a science there, and science has rules that it has to follow. Even if it’s not… DNA, they’ll tell you, is not an exact science — it’s over 99 percent accurate. So it’s pretty close, but you still have to follow the rules.”
