Due to search Nancy Guthrie It goes on to say that the FBI has intervened to clear up confusion over reports of newly discovered DNA evidence, claiming that the claims being circulated are not “new.”
On April 16, 2026, ABC News Channel X announced that federal investigators “received and are analyzing potentially critical DNA recovered from a home in Tucson, Arizona.” Nancy Guthrie”, citing a source familiar with the investigation.
Also read: Who is Christina Snow? Shamar Elkins’ girlfriend posts disturbing post about Louisiana shooter
Nancy Guthrie update: FBI senior advisor provides major update on DNA evidence
In response to the news, FBI Assistant Director for Public Affairs Ben Williamson said: “We are still receiving inquiries about this: this is not new evidence or information. The FBI asked two months ago to test this DNA using the same technology we have always had when the local sheriff sent it to a private laboratory. Any further developments will be shared as soon as possible.”
Earlier, DNA samples failed to produce a match in the mix DNA Index System (CODIS), which is the FBI’s database of criminal offenders or individuals who are determined to be “mixed” with another person’s DNA.
84-year-old mother Nancy Savannah GuthrieOn February 1, 2026, the anchor of NBC’s “Today” show disappeared after being visited by his family after missing a church service. Authorities said she was likely abducted in the early morning hours because her pacemaker lost connection with her phone around 2:30 a.m., indicating the device was out of range.
More than two and a half months have passed since the investigation into Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance began, but so far no suspects have been identified and the search continues.
Former CIA official says DNA analysis could solve Nancy Guthrie case
Former CIA official Tracy Walder said DNA testing could play a crucial role in the investigation. FBI The agent appeared on “The Elizabeth Vargas Report” Friday.
“This is a situation where we need this information to be able to exclude people or exclude people. So in a situation like this where we don’t actually have a lot of digital forensic evidence, which is obviously what the FBI is very good at, really, it becomes very, very important,” Wald told NewsNation.
“As we’ve seen, we have a distinct lack of video forensic evidence, as well as actual phone calls and that type of forensic evidence, so I think there’s no question in this case that the hair was important in determining who was in and out, and the FBI may have to investigate whether they can figure out who it was,” she added.
