Did Candace Owens hint at Donald Trump’s involvement in the Charlie Kirk case? Laura Loomer responds
Candace Owens sparks new controversy online after reacting to New York Times report about president Donald TrumpAccording to reports, with Charlie Kirk Kirk before his death. Shortly after Owens shared her thoughts on X, Laura Loomer accused her of suggesting Trump was responsible for Charlie Kirk’s assassination. However, Owens never made this claim directly. The discussion began after a New York Times article by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan reported that Trump was unhappy with criticism surrounding his handling of past document controversies. According to reports, Trump allegedly called Charlie Kirk after the Turning Point USA event, where the speaker criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi’s response to the issue. Owens later tied the report to her own timeline of Kirk’s death, sparking a wave of reactions online. While many users supported Owens, others strongly disagreed with her comments. So far, neither Donald Trump nor Erika Kirk have publicly responded to Owens’ latest comments. Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, 2025, during the Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.
Candace Owens’ post about Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk raises eyebrows
After the New York Times report broke, Candace Owens shared a post on X discussing the reported phone call between Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk. “It’s so crazy to learn that Donald Trump called Charlie and berated him for his reporting on the Epstein dossier,” Owens wrote. “On July 12th, the day after I had insisted on our timeline for killing Charlie.”The wording sparked concern online. However, Owens did not directly accuse Trump of killing Charlie Kirk. Instead, she cited her own theory and timeline when discussing the reported phone call. Laura Loomer disagreed with Owens and accused her of constantly changing her claims. In another post, Loomer mocked Owens’ comments and questioned her previous suggestions about who might be involved. Owens has previously disputed the official account of Kirk’s assassination, but many of her claims remain unsubstantiated.
Laura Loomer reacts as social media users are divided over Candace Owens’ claims
The exchange between Laura Loomer and Candace Owens quickly went viral on social media. Many users rejected Owens’ comments and criticized her theories.One user wrote: “I wonder if Candace would buy into these crazy theories since she herself believes that killing someone is completely justified if they upset you even slightly once.”Another user posted, “Candace you are ruining everything Charlie has worked for. If you were his friend why would you ruin something?”Others defended Owens and said her issues deserved attention. One supporter wrote: “100% agree. I’ve felt for a long time that there was more to this story than what we were told.”Another user added, “Candace is saying what a lot of people are thinking. The timeline is disturbing and the optics of it all are terrible.”Despite the heated debate, there is no evidence that Candace Owens directly accused Donald Trump of killing Charlie Kirk. The debate continues online, with supporters and critics interpreting her remarks in different ways.
