Chagos deal: ‘Will only go ahead with US support’: UK pulls out of Chagos deal after Donald Trump criticism
U.S. backs uncertainty to block legislation
The agreement, signed in May 2025, was initially backed by the United States. However, tensions escalated after Trump publicly criticized the plan, calling it a “complete act of weakness” and urging the UK not to “give up on Diego Garcia”.Despite earlier support from the US State Department, the UK was unable to proceed due to a lack of formal confirmation. A government spokesman stressed that the deal would only move forward with U.S. approval, adding that ensuring the long-term security of Diego Garcia remained “the whole reason for the deal.”The BBC quoted a government spokesman as saying: “The Diego Garcia is an important strategic military asset for the UK and the US. Ensuring its long-term operational security is, and will continue to be, our top priority – which is the whole reason for this agreement.”“We continue to believe this agreement is the best way to protect the long-term future of the base, but we have always said we will only proceed with it if we have U.S. support. We are continuing to engage with the United States and Mauritius,” the spokesman added. The proposed arrangement involves the UK paying around £101m a year to lease the base, a key British and US military asset in the Indian Ocean.
Strategic and political issues dominate debate
The Chagos Archipelago, which has been controlled by Britain since the early 19th century, has significant geopolitical importance due to the presence of the Diego Garcia base, which has supported major military operations including in Afghanistan and the Middle East.The agreement also aims to resolve a long-running sovereignty dispute over the islands, which Mauritius has claimed since independence. Critics, however, believe the move could weaken the region’s strategic position, especially amid increasing global competition.
Political backlash and criticism intensifies
The shelving of the deal sparked a strong political reaction. Conservative leader Kemie Badenock welcomed the move, saying the deal should be consigned to the “ash heap of history” and accusing Starmer of trying to “hand over sovereign British territory”.Likewise, UK Reform Party leader Nigel Farage called the suspension “long overdue” and urged the government to prioritize the resettlement rights of displaced Chagossians.Critics elsewhere, however, say the deal was handled inconsistently. Calum Miller, the Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman, described the process as “utter chaos” and warned that Trump’s shift in stance exposed the fragility of the UK-US partnership.Meanwhile, many Chagossians oppose the deal, seeing it as a betrayal that does not guarantee their right to return to the archipelago after being displaced decades ago.With no Chagos-related legislation expected in the upcoming King’s Speech, the future of the deal remains uncertain as the UK remains in talks with the US and Mauritius.
WEB DESK TEAM
Our team of more than 15 experienced writers brings diverse perspectives, deep research, and on-the-ground insights to deliver accurate, timely, and engaging stories. From breaking news to in-depth analysis, they are committed to credibility, clarity, and responsible journalism across every category we cover.