US-Iran ceasefire serves US medium-term goals rather than lasting peace: report
A ceasefire between the United States and Iran eased fears of a wider conflict and led to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, sending oil prices lower. However, Reuters quoted analysts as saying the truce was likely to be tactical rather than permanent. To date, fundamental disputes over Iran’s nuclear program, regional influence and sanctions remain unresolved.The two sides have agreed to 60 days of talks, but there is little sign of common ground. For now, the market is breathing a sigh of relief, but it could be temporary.
Why the ceasefire holds
The analysis found that the biggest reason for maintaining the truce was American politics. As the November midterm elections approach, the Trump administration cannot afford a spike in gasoline prices. Voters were already unhappy with inflation, and the war made it worse. During the conflict, gasoline prices reached nearly $4.50 per gallon. The price has since fallen to around $3.90, but any new disruption could reverse that.Washington therefore has a strong incentive to keep the strait open and avoid another energy shock. That means engaging with Iran, even if the terms are less than ideal.Iran knows this and can exploit it. Merely threatening the strait, without even closing it, could push oil prices higher. This gave Tehran leverage it did not have before the war.
What happens after the US election?
If Democrats take back the House, which they are currently expected to do, Trump could face a more hostile Congress. The domestic stalemate may prompt him to seek foreign policy victories that would give him more room to maneuver.Trump has already been criticized for a deal that many say benefits Iran. If negotiations stall by the fall, he may find military pressure more attractive than diplomacy.Iran may have the upper hand for now, but analysts worry that could change once the elections are over.
Domestic political divisions
According to analysis by the New York Times, the Iran war also exposed deep differences within the two political parties in the United States. Among Democrats, two current House members in New York lost primary challenges to candidates who said they were not sufficiently critical of Israel. The rise of anti-war progressives has forced the party to consider how far it can go without alienating moderates and Jewish voters.The divisions among Republicans are different, but no less real. Isolationists who supported Trump’s pledge to avoid foreign wars felt betrayed by his intervention in Iran. Meanwhile, party hawks are angry that the administration is currently negotiating with Tehran without achieving its goals of weakening Iran’s military or ending its regime.A New York Times poll showed that 53% of Republican voters under the age of 45 disapprove of Trump’s handling of the Iran war, compared with 75% of older Republican voters. High-profile conservatives such as Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly have publicly broken with the Republican Party over the war, and former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene recently left the party, citing her opposition to the conflict.
Iran’s real weapons
Iran does not need to close the strait to harm the global economy. It just needs to make traders think it might happen. This risk premium could push up oil prices, transportation costs and even fertilizer prices. In an election year, that’s real power, according to the analysis.But if a deal is not reached in the fall, Iran’s influence could wane. After being elected, Trump is freed from some political constraints and may decide to strike again.The Iran war may be on hold, but it’s not over yet. The next few months will determine whether this ceasefire becomes a lasting solution or just a pause before the next round.The biggest risk is not another war next week. It’s a recurring cycle of crisis, diplomacy, then escalation, then diplomacy again, leading to market volatility and global economic tensions.