Will Trump fire Pam Bondi over Epstein dossier dispute? Shocking reports emerge following Kristi Noem and Joe Kent departures

Wednesday, CNN and new york times Claims that the president has “considered” firing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi could be a sign of deep divisions within the Trump administration. Trump’s considerations come in the context of how Bundy handled the incident. Jeffrey Epstein The documents and subsequent frustration among Trump’s base of supporters.

Earlier, Kristi Noem resigned from the Department of Homeland Security after being grilled about her extramarital affair with a Trump adviser. Corey Lewandowskiduring a House Judiciary Committee hearing on her handling of the Department of Homeland Security. Trump later reportedly fired Lewandowski from his position in the White House.

As for Bondi, Trump appears to be considering preemptive measures as the attorney general faces congressional hearings later in April related to the Epstein investigation. According to CNN, citing sources, Trump has been asking around whether Bondi should be fired.

However, sources said Trump has not yet made a decision on Bundy’s future ahead of a congressional hearing. In response to CNN’s request for comment on the claims, Trump said Bundy was a “great guy” who “did a great job.”

Bundy has faced criticism for extensively redacting and delaying the release of Epstein documents and violating Epstein Documents Transparency Act deadlines. Democratic lawmakers have accused her of a cover-up and putting political protection over victim justice and transparency.

Also read: Where is Pam Bundy? Amid rising threats, AG leaves Washington, D.C. home and enters secure military base

Also read: Warren Buffett says he hasn’t spoken to Bill Gates since Epstein scandal revealed

This will be a private meeting and the media will not be admitted. Committee Chairman James Comer called the meeting after a March 4 bipartisan subpoena vote. The committee plans to investigate compliance issues, including redactions and the withholding of documents amid allegations of cover-ups by both parties.

This follows her controversial public testimony on February 11 before the House Judiciary Committee on broader Justice Department oversight issues.