‘Weird attack on me’: Candace Owens accuses Ben Shapiro of filing lawsuit, Laura Loomer responds with strong criticism

Candace Owens and Laura Loomer’s public feud is getting worse. On May 4, 2026, the two posted a long message on X, making strong claims against each other. Owens said Ben Shapiro was behind legal proceedings and online attacks against her and her family. Meanwhile, Loomer fired back, saying Owens was dodging key questions and not denying her reporting. Other names soon appeared for this condition, such as Anna Kasparian and groups such as Turning Point USA. What started as an online argument has now turned into claims over lawsuits, private data and personal targets.Owens claims this has been going on for years and says her family is being targeted financially. However, Loomer said Owens was trying to play the victim and not answering the real question. Both sides are now making serious claims without publicly sharing clear evidence, adding to tensions and confusing followers.

Candace Owens accuses Ben Shapiro of lawsuits and attacks, Laura Loomer responds strongly

Candace Owens shared a lengthy post claiming that Ben Shapiro was hurting her behind the scenes. “@benshapiro was behind every bizarre attack on me and my family last week,” she wrote. She also claimed that legal action against her was brought through people connected to him, including an attorney with ties to his family.She added that the situation was linked to problems within the Daily Telegraph, including redundancies, but gave no evidence. Owens said Shapiro was trying to “bankrupt” her family and had been “legally harassing” her for years. She concluded her post by saying her family would not break under the pressure, writing: “You will never tear apart what God has put together.”Laura Loomer was quick to reply, directly challenging Owens. “You didn’t deny my report?” she said. Loomer claimed Owens told her followers that her report was false but didn’t actually deny the details. She also criticized Owens for bringing religion into the debate, writing: “Happy people don’t need to announce to the world that they are happy.”Loomer further said: “For the record, she did not deny any of my reporting. Why should I care if she is a Christian? ” Her tone made it clear she believed she had the upper hand in the argument.Meanwhile, others joined the discussion. A user named Jody Chase posted a summary saying Owens confirmed Shapiro’s role in the attack and linked it to issues within The Daily Wire. Another reply from John Mapin referenced tensions at Turning Point in America and hinted at deeper divisions between the leaders.The situation became more serious when Owens later accused Loomer of sharing private information about her car and family. Owens said some of the information shared online was false, but she confirmed that certain details, such as her vehicle, were correctly exposed. She claims Loomer may have obtained the information through illegal means involving someone with access to the car’s records.Owens wrote that if this claim is true, this could be a serious crime involving access to personal data. She also said similar methods may have been used to find details about Ana Kasparian’s family.Loomer, meanwhile, filed separate charges against Anna Kasparian, saying she spread false information and refused to correct it. Loomer said legal action may be taken and accused Kasparian of working with Owens.Currently, all of these claims come directly from posts on X by the people involved. No official legal documents or verified reports have been publicly shared to back up many of these claims. This makes it difficult to confirm what is true and what is false.The fight continues, and more responses are likely to come as both sides continue to post online. What’s clear is that this is no longer just a simple online disagreement, but now involves lawsuits, private data, and serious claims from long-standing conflicts between high-profile public figures.