Categories: WORLD

‘It’s a new world…’: Top Trump lawyer John Saul clashes with Judge Roberts over birthright citizenship

Trump’s top lawyer, deputy attorney general John SauerChief Justice John Roberts got into a heated argument Wednesday during a Supreme Court hearing on birthright citizenship. Before Justice Roberts interjected, the 51-year-old argued that there was a “new world.”

Donald Trump, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick (right) and U.S. Deputy Attorney General John Saul (left) at a news conference (Bloomberg)

John Saul vs Justice Roberts

“This is a new world where billions of people are now just a flight away from the United States,” Sauer said.

Chief Roberts quickly responded to Saul, saying: “It’s a new world, but the constitution is the same”

Saul further added that “no one knows for sure,” referring to the scope of “birth tourism.”

Read more: Trump claims Iran has asked for ceasefire: ‘Will consider when Strait of Hormuz opens’

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court began hearing arguments over Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship for children born illegally or temporarily in the United States.

Trump signed the birthright citizenship order on Jan. 20, 2025, the first day of his second term, as part of his Republican administration’s broad crackdown on immigration. The president attended Wednesday’s hearing.

Government defends restrictions on citizenship

Sauer’s argument focuses on the concepts of allegiance and permanent residence. He told the court that the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was never intended to apply broadly to all individuals born on U.S. soil.

The provision, he explained, “was passed shortly after the Civil War to grant citizenship to newly freed slaves and their children whose allegiance to the United States had been established by the generations who had settled here.”

He added that it does not “confer citizenship to the children of temporary visitors or illegal aliens who do not have such allegiance.”

Sauer also insisted that Trump’s executive order “only applies to the future.”

Read more: Report says Trump ‘considering withdrawing from NATO’ after allies suffer setback in Iran war

Judge expresses concern over scope

The government’s position, however, was met with resistance from both conservative and liberal judges.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the logic behind this argument could have far-reaching implications, suggesting it could allow a future president to strip citizenship from individuals born in the United States years later.

Chief Justice Roberts questioned whether existing exceptions to birthright citizenship, such as those of children of diplomats or foreign invaders, could reasonably be expanded to cover undocumented immigrants. He said it was unclear how those limited examples applied to “an entire class of illegal immigrants.”

He added that he was not sure “how to get such a large group from such a small and special example.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch also raised doubts, noting that there was little historical discussion to support Sauer’s reliance on residence. Justice Elena Kagan echoed those concerns, saying part of the government’s argument was based on “some pretty vague sources.”

Fourteenth Amendment

The debate goes back to the origins of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Clarence Thomas questioned whether immigration played any meaningful role in these discussions, asking: “How much of the debate surrounding the 14th Amendment has to do with immigration?”

Opponents of the government’s view point to long-standing precedent. The 1898 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark established that children born in the United States to foreign parents were citizens.

In that ruling, Justice Horace Gray wrote that the Fourteenth Amendment “affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory,” including children born to aliens.

Birth tourism and modern concerns

Chief Justice Roberts also pressed Saul on modern issues such as “birth tourism,” in which individuals travel to the United States to give birth in order for their children to gain citizenship.

Asked about the scale of the problem, Saul acknowledged the uncertainty and said “no one knows for sure” while citing “media estimates.”

What’s at stake?

While birthright citizenship is firmly established in the United States, it remains uncommon globally, with most countries relying on the principle of jus sanguinis, or citizenship based on the nationality of the parents.

(With AP input)

WEB DESK TEAM

Our team of more than 15 experienced writers brings diverse perspectives, deep research, and on-the-ground insights to deliver accurate, timely, and engaging stories. From breaking news to in-depth analysis, they are committed to credibility, clarity, and responsible journalism across every category we cover.

Recent Posts

Who is John Saul? Trump’s deputy attorney general leads hearing on birthright citizenship case

D John Sauer became the 49th Deputy Attorney General of the United States on April 4, 2025. Prior to that,…

20 minutes ago

2027 Census begins: President Murmu, Prime Minister Modi and other leaders complete self-count

New Delhi: President Drupadi Murmu on Wednesday participated in a self-examination exercise for Census 2027 at the Rashtrapati Bhavan, according…

36 minutes ago

‘Not just the Straits, but also the gays in Hormuz’: Strange comments from ‘No King’ protesters go viral | World News

On March 29, 2026, "No King" protests swept the United States and parts of Western Europe, attracting thousands of people…

46 minutes ago

Punjab: Suspect hurls grenade-like object outside BJP office before blast

New Delhi: An explosion outside the Punjab unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters in Chandigarh on Wednesday night…

1 hour ago

This is what the human body looks like after surviving a car accident, according to science |

This is what surviving a car crash looks like for humans, according to science / TAC Although modern life has…

2 hours ago

Watch: Pant giggles after bizarre dismissal in LSG’s first match against DC

Rishabh Pant dismissed in LSG vs DC match (Screenshot) New Delhi: Lucknow Supergiants captain Ritha Pant His opening experiment got…

2 hours ago